Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Kerry delivers.Follow

#27 Jul 30 2004 at 10:00 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
Can you back that up?

Do I have numbers? Not really. But why do you think that metropolitan areas skew liberal? Hmm, could it be the large populations of minorities, who in this country tend to be Black, Hispanic and Asian, that migrates to the ghetto because they are too poor to afford a house in a decent neighborhood, probably because the are too uneducated to get a decent job, probably because mommy and the wife beating baby's daddy she was with at the time are ghetto trash too.

Yeah, I have no numbers. But I am not completely retarded either. Democratic power bases are in cities. They are in cities because the people who utilize the services they champion are largely in the ghett-ho.
#28 Jul 30 2004 at 10:01 AM Rating: Decent
**
522 posts
Quote:
You know what's ironic about this whole election? Most of the on the line voters and even a good portion of Bushes base, don't like either of the choices. Not many are going to vote for Bush or Kerry they are voting against the other persons opponent.

Varus


This is what drives every election nowadays. You don't think anyone actually believes candidate A do you ? Nope - they just hate candidiate B more.

It's no surprise the way the world works since most people's political involvement is based on a negative driver.

For a good example - this forum is mainly full of "your candidate is full of sh*t" threads and not "my candidate is good because ...." .

No wonder there's a general voter apathy out there. Pretty hard to get motivated by politics wjhich can be summed up by "vote for me because he's an idiot".
#29 Jul 30 2004 at 10:01 AM Rating: Decent
In the Us Today paper their prelimanary vote had Bush 48%, Kerry 44% and Nader 4%.
#30 Jul 30 2004 at 10:02 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
Just watched the sound bites, huh. Should have watched the actual speech.

I sat through the entire amusing speach.
#31 Jul 30 2004 at 10:03 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Democratic policy demands that government be responsible for the welfare of those that they deem worthy (the poor, lazy and ingigent). It demands that those who should pay for this are those that can pay for it themselves. The best way to cover public services is to tax the wealthy to such an extent that their means no longer allow them to enjoy the level of success that they have attained.


Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.

Democrats want a fair even playing feild where every child has equal opportunity to succeed regardless of where he's born or what color his skin is.



Democrats abhor the wealthy. They abhor success. You can argue this, but looking at the arguments made by the democratic party, and their advocates, in any logical way leads to only one conclusion. Case in point, the dark cubby that the democratic party tries to keep John Edwards' back ground in. Bob forbid that we mention the words trial lawyer. Please, dear Bob, don't let people associate him with being the guy who bilks old ladies out of 30-50% of their court settlements on contigency.


You don't make the money Edwards made by "bilking" anyone. When you're making millions from your statutorily manded 28% contingency fee, your clients are recieving millions in compensation for damages caused by neglegent parties.

He helped poor people derive some sort of compensation after they suffered terrible injuries at the hands of powerfull corperations.

How horrible.

No one's trying to obscure his backround, it's a central part of his speeches.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#32 Jul 30 2004 at 10:06 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts


I sat through the entire amusing speach.


Really? It must have confused you, you only seem to have heard the five minutes they used as soundbites.

Why would you pay attention, though. Your mind was made up about Kerry before you even knew who he was when you found out he was a Democrat.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#33 Jul 30 2004 at 10:11 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
Democrats want a fair even playing feild where every child has equal opportunity to succeed regardless of where he's born or what color his skin is

Translation:
Democrats want to give the lazy hood rat's 5 welfare kids the same stuff you had to work you *** off to give your kids. The Democrats don't care whether you contribute to society or not, Bob forbid we don't prolong your pathetic waste of a life with expensive medical treatments so we can keep paying you welfare. Democrats don't care if it will put hundreds out of a job, ensuring that their children lose health care, sometimes food and housing, they will not let you log one more damn tree that might be home to a spotted owl. Democrats don't care if you pay $5.00 a gallon for gasoline, you better not use the oil we don't have to go to the middle east for.

Democratic party platform is thinly veiled, often not even that, socialism. Success and hard work means nothing to the Democratic Party.
#34 Jul 30 2004 at 10:13 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,311 posts
Moe, you can't possibly believe this.
#35 Jul 30 2004 at 10:16 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Moe, you can't possibly believe this.


Course he doesn't, he's just baiting me.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#36 Jul 30 2004 at 10:17 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
Really? It must have confused you, you only seem to have heard the five minutes they used as soundbites.

Yep. Granted, I had a crying 3 month old on my lap for the first 10 minutes, but I saw it all. I am choosing not to comment on his war rhetoric, or his "back door draft" remarks, or his suggestions that Mr. Ashcroft doesn't uphold the constitution. As for sound-bites, I have not seen any news since last nite, so I havent seen them.
Quote:
Why would you pay attention, though. Your mind was made up about Kerry before you even knew who he was when you found out he was a Democrat.
Not true. My mind has been made up about the Democratic Party since I can remember. But I do pay quite a bit of attention to what they say. It's nice to see the lies that one side says about the other (both ways). Hell, my primary source of news is MPR. I get DFL dogma on a daily basis.
#37 Jul 30 2004 at 10:19 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Democrats want to give the lazy hood rat's 5 welfare kids the same stuff you had to work you *** off to give your kids


I didn't know it was the 5 welfare kids fault that their in that situation but since they are they shouldn't recieve the same quaitly care as someone who isn't on welfare. Democrats want equality among people as a whole. It's sad that they are on welfare and I hate that too but you are a product of your environment and in that sense it's really not their fault. If thats all you have ever known how do you expect them to do anything different.

Edited, Fri Jul 30 11:20:31 2004 by shidoshi
#38 Jul 30 2004 at 10:20 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
Democrats want to give the lazy hood rat's 5 welfare kids the same stuff you had to work you *** off to give your kids
Varrus? That you?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#39 Jul 30 2004 at 10:20 AM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
That sounds a little extreme mobiussword. I don't think that most democrats are that polarized. If you're going to polarize that far you could say that right would be happy to just abolish all of this stupid labor and paycheck nonsense and just admit that anyone who makes less than 6 figures a year is a slave and must remain one for all future generations. They should be happy to work for food and a trailer at the local trailer park.
____________________________
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere

Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
#40 Jul 30 2004 at 10:21 AM Rating: Good
Smash is partly correct. The extent of the ferver with which I defend the right is more bait than anything else. But I do firmly believe that while "all men are created equal", they are also responsible for their own choices, and I shouldn't have to pay for their mistakes.
#41 Jul 30 2004 at 10:22 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
Varrus? That you?

Nah, he wouldn't have euphamised. he would have just come out and said n$%#@*s. ;)
#42 Jul 30 2004 at 10:24 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
644 posts
Considering that Ashcroft is the anti-thesis of what every Attorney General should stand for (i.e. the Constitution and the law), I think merely saying he doesn't uphold the Constitution is a nice way of putting it.

He's a f*cking fascist pig that should never have gotten to the position he's in.

Moe, MPR treats Pawlenty with kid gloves every day. I see it first hand. I listen to MPR. If there is a liberal bias, it's not much of one at this point. Then again, no one from the press asks Pawlenty tough questions. They seem to have no qualms asking my side tough questions. Every press conference I'm at there's literally a dozen common sense, tough but fair, questions that I would have asked as a reporter (and having been one I would have asked) that simply are ignored. It's sickening.

I'll grant you the Star Trib editorial board is about as left wing as you come, but look at 5, 1500, 4, 'CCO and even 11 aren't exactly liberal bastions.

If you're talking programming, I'll conceed your point about MPR. But their news is mostly balanced (there's always some bias).

Grady

Edited, Fri Jul 30 11:25:31 2004 by Grady
____________________________
I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by madness, starving hysterical naked, dragging themselves through the negro streets at dawn looking for an angry fix, angelheaded hipsters burning for the ancient heavenly connection to the starry dynamo in the machin ery of night.
#43 Jul 30 2004 at 10:24 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
it's really not their fault.

That's the democratic party's answer for everything on the social agenda.
#44 Jul 30 2004 at 10:26 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
it's really not their fault.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


That's the democratic party's answer for everything on the social agenda.


And if that was you in that situation you wouldn't want them to try and reach out to help you?
#45 Jul 30 2004 at 10:27 AM Rating: Decent
*
202 posts
Quote:
Democratic party platform is thinly veiled, often not even that, socialism. Success and hard work means nothing to the Democratic Party.


Oh no, not Solcialism...
WE CAN'T HAVE SOCIALISM

Let's see. The following things qualify as socialism (citzens paying into a central authority so that all may benefit - even if you don't directly benefit).

The U.S. Military - we don't always directly benefit.
Public Education - we don't always directly benefit.
Police Departments - we don't always directly benefit.
Fire Departments - we don't always directly benefit.
Roads and Infrastructure - we don't always directly benefit.

Are you still against Socialism, or do you just want to define it your way with cliche neagative connotations?
#46 Jul 30 2004 at 10:27 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
You know what it is that bothers me so much about most people that vote Republican?

It's not that they might hold views that I disagree with, that honestly doesn't bother me, they have right to advocate for what's best for them.

What bothers me is that most of them, not all, but most of them, are being duped. They think they are voting in their own self intrest when really, they're not.

My wife's parents are Republicans. They're what used to be referred to as "country club" Republicans. They benefit from Republican policies. They have a large amount of investment income, they're socialy conservative, aren't fond of change, and so on.

I don't begrudge them voting Republican. I don't agree them on most issues, but it really doesn't bother me.

People like Moe, though, I just can't fathom. Unless he has a great deal of wealth or an income in the high six figures and is exceptionaly conservative socially, he's actually harming his own self intrest by voting for Bush.

He's loosing money long term, loosing services that he's probably going to have some reliance on when he's elderly and he's willfully surrenduering civil liberties for no discernable reason.

That's the part that bothers me. That people who make 80k a year have been sold a bill of goods that high bracket and capital gains tax cuts benefit them somehow, and that because they're middle aged white guys that the civil liberties lost won't effect them, just the brown skinned people and the ********

Enlighten a brother, Moe. Why is it you'll be voting for Bush?
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#47 Jul 30 2004 at 10:28 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
If you're talking programming, I'll conceed your point about MPR. But their news is mostly balanced (there's always some bias).

I am more referring to programming. Mid Morning, etc. The hourly/half hourly news breaks are no more biased than any other source, in my opinion.
#48 Jul 30 2004 at 10:29 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
644 posts
Only when it's not Moe. Only when it's not.

You can't control where you grow up, what your parents are like, and how affluent they are. Just because you're on the short end of that stick doesn't mean you shouldn't have the same opportunity as some one on the long side of it.

You remind me of Joe Soucharay. Too busy ******** about nothing to admit that while life isn't fair, will never be fair, that doesn't mean that we shouldn't do our damndest to even up the playing field.

The Republican mantra is: We got ours, f*ck everyone else. You embody that philosophy better than just about any other poster here.

Varus is Smash's puppet anyway. Not Moes.

Grady

Edited, Fri Jul 30 11:32:10 2004 by Grady
____________________________
I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by madness, starving hysterical naked, dragging themselves through the negro streets at dawn looking for an angry fix, angelheaded hipsters burning for the ancient heavenly connection to the starry dynamo in the machin ery of night.
#49 Jul 30 2004 at 10:30 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Do I have numbers? Not really. But why do you think that metropolitan areas skew liberal? Hmm, could it be the large populations of minorities, who in this country tend to be Black, Hispanic and Asian, that migrates to the ghetto because they are too poor to afford a house in a decent neighborhood, probably because the are too uneducated to get a decent job, probably because mommy and the wife beating baby's daddy she was with at the time are ghetto trash too.


This is utter bullsh[i][/i]it. Metropolitan areas skew liberal because intelligent, aware, open-minded people live in CITIES. Whereas the further you go out, you get more close-minded bigotted people who don't like other people's worlds colliding into theirs. It just makes sense.

You are exactly wrong Moe.
#50 Jul 30 2004 at 10:33 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
644 posts
Pickle, truth is it's a bit of both.

Grady
____________________________
I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by madness, starving hysterical naked, dragging themselves through the negro streets at dawn looking for an angry fix, angelheaded hipsters burning for the ancient heavenly connection to the starry dynamo in the machin ery of night.
#51 Jul 30 2004 at 10:34 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,311 posts
When I hear from people of lower income, women or people of color talking about how they vote republican, I generally get the same answer from them: "Those damn democrats just want to take all my money in taxes."

That's all. They apparently heard that once, were, by and large too disinterested in politics to actually check out the values and goals advocated by the parties, and were finished thinking about their decision.

The democrats want my money so I vote republican.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 374 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (374)