Quote:
It'd be a powerless office. There'd be about four days when the President wasn't campaigning for re-election.
The six year thing is a better idea, but still too long. I do think they should limit it to two consecutive terms instead of two terms absolute. Not because I'd want to see Clinton in particular re-elected, but because it's very likely in the best intrest of the country to allow a young two term president to be elected to a third term later in his life.
The office is what you make it. It can be a coke-room or a whorehouse. Both have been proved in recent years.
I'm wholly opposed to longer terms. I want accountability. The entire idea behind having shorter, but renewable terms is that a President IS campaigning for his office while he's in it. The way these jerks get into office is by making promises. Well, let them put up or shut up. They, like most employees, will be more productive if held accountable.
Face it, if GWB had done the job he's doing right now for the past four years....Kerry wouldn't stand a chance. But GWB did a ****-poor job until it started looking mighty bleak for the ole GOP. Kerry stands a very good chance, IMO. I don't know which one of these knuckleheads will get the Presidency out of the election. But I want a chance to hold him accountable before 4 years go by....and not just by impeachment.