Varus wrote:
And where can I find those stats?
Try
Here or:
the Alan Guttmacher Institute in November 2003, A, B, and C in Uganda: The Roles of Abstinence, Monogamy, and Condom Use in HIV Decline
wrote:
The study found that between 1988 and 1995
Fewer Ugandans were having sex at young ages.
Levels of monogamy increased.
Condom use rose steeply among unmarried sexually active women and men.
The report concluded: "Progress on the three components of the ABC approach contributed to bringing about and sustaining reduced exposure to HIV in Uganda.… Development funds to combat HIV should focus on policies and programs designed to target all three prongs — 'A,' 'B,' and 'C.'"
Even stronger evidence has emerged since the Uganda experience to suggest that an abstinence-only approach to HIV prevention is a dangerous one. A study published in AIDS in 2001, "Why Do Young Women Have a Much Higher Prevalence of HIV Than Young Men? A Study in Kisumu, Kenya, and Ndola, Zambia," found that in the regions studied, the risk of HIV was actually greater in those who were married compared with those who were unmarried, particularly for women younger than 25.
These findings confirm more than ever that an abstinence-only message for unmarried people is not sufficient to stop the spread of HIV/AIDS. Young women and men need access to comprehensive, medically accurate sex education that can save their lives. Sadly, Congress and the administration seem committed to continuing down the opposite path, both at home and abroad.
And for Christian Aid's view, try
here. Dunno about you, but I've not noticed Christian Aid being badged as bleeding heart liberals
If you're really keen to see more impartial stuff I could dig some out from work, but I'm not convinced that's what you wanted
In a recent meeting with Public Health Doctors and Health Statisticians/Epidemiologists from across Europe and the US, many had studied available evidence from evaluations of programmes, and none had found any evidenced support for abstinence only.
They did find heaps of articles by advocates of abstinence which made unsubstantiated claims, and plenty of statistics that collapsed under scrutiny.
Outside of the Bush administration, I've yet to find any official body who supports it.
I've not cited my opinions above - just those of the various independent researchers that cropped up on a web search.
I haven't cited the ones I found that have a clear left-wing or anti-US or anti-abstinence line, purely those with an impartial agenda.
Feel free to find independent ones that negate it and back up with evidence . . . there are an army of health professionals out there trying to find them
My views are simple - parents have a responsibility to educate their kids, the state has a responsibility to back 'em up.
When education is offered by the state, the state has a responsibility to review the evidence and base their advice on that; They ought to ignore political pressure from the right wing 'just say no' mob and the liberal do-gooding 'teach 5 years olds BJ techniques' hippies.