Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Rumors of Nukes found in Iraq...Follow

#27 Jul 21 2004 at 11:25 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
The original source is a Iraqi Newspaper al Sabah


Iraqi newspaper al-Sabah is reporting that three missiles with nuclear warheads have been discovered in a trench like bunker near ousted dictator Saddam Hussein’s hometown of Tikrit.

The paper reports that the location of the WMD’s was given by captured Baath party official Khoder al-Douri, after a lengthy interrogation process.

Third party verification of the reported find has not been made yet. The US denies this report.

____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#28 Jul 22 2004 at 9:08 AM Rating: Decent
Lol, the poor iraqi probably confused "nuke" for "food".
#29 Jul 22 2004 at 3:13 PM Rating: Default
Laurenthasala wrote:
Mindspirals wrote:
I hope they find nothing, so that our war-monger president won't cause more deaths to our brothers and sisters in future wars (say, with Iran) over the next 4 years. You can quote me on that - if Bush wins, which is more likely if we find the nukes, we will be going to war again. If Kerry wins, not nearly as likely.


What are the effects of not going to war versus the consequences of going to war? This assumes all evidence on terrorism, et al holds true.


The point is: We went to war far too early, without the approval of the United Nations, the support of most of our Allies, and the proper intelligence and planning. What would have happened if we had waited for that information? Nothing, most likely, based on information, investigations, and reports on prewar intelligence since then. By doing so, we alienated a good portion of the world, and gave them the impression of the U.S. being a bullheaded, preemptive, and arrogant country.

I'm all for going to war under the right circumstances.

We went under the wrong circumstances, with poor planning, and an ignorant Secretary of Defense who underestimated the number of troops and equipment we would need. A majority of our troops for the beginning of the conflict didn't even have bullet-proof vests. The families of these soldiers, as poor as they often are, spent hundreds of dollars of their own money for these items.
#30 Jul 22 2004 at 3:20 PM Rating: Good
You should take your own sig to heart. We went to war because the president wanted to. Period. Get over it.
#31 Jul 22 2004 at 3:50 PM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
Quote:
We went to war because the president wanted to...

True that.

Quote:
...Period. Get over it.


To bad some people don't understand the concept of speaking out for what one believes in or against what shouldn't happen though.
#32 Jul 22 2004 at 4:32 PM Rating: Decent
This quote says it all

Quote:

The point is: We went to war far too early, without the approval of the United Nations, the support of most of our Allies, and the proper intelligence and planning. What would have happened if we had waited for that information? Nothing, most likely, based on information, investigations, and reports on prewar intelligence since then. By doing so, we alienated a good portion of the world, and gave them the impression of the U.S. being a bullheaded, preemptive, and arrogant country.


This is the type of commy anti-american sentiment that is prevalent throughout the democratic party and one of the main reasons kerry doesn't stand a chance.

The majority of americans do not think we need the approval of the UN in order to head off possible threats to America. However, we did alienate quite a bit of the world, but that's to be expected considering the majority of the world don't believe in the ideals of a democratic society. So regardless of what the U.S. does half the world is going to be in opposition to it.

And listen to yourselfs you're actually hoping the U.S. doesn't find any nuc's even if they're there. One of the major reasons we went to war was to uncover these nuc's and now that some may have possibly been discovered you have dems screaming politics, it's not enough, and all sorts of things.

The point is Iraq was a threat, and still is, the minute Iraq expelled the inspectors years ago they broke the cease-fire agreement we should have gone in. We are only doing now, under strong leadership, doing what no other country in europe was willing to do, sound familiar <cough> ww2.

Varus


#33 Jul 22 2004 at 4:38 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
one of the main reasons kerry doesn't stand a chance.


If you want to put your money where your fat-assed mouth is, Smash has a running wager.

Kerry is so going to kill Bush.
#34 Jul 22 2004 at 4:39 PM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
Does anyone else think varrussword has become a caricature of a narrow minded, beer swilling, white trash, wife beater?
#35 Jul 22 2004 at 4:44 PM Rating: Decent
Being a devout Christian I don't gamble.

And does anyone here deny that Iraq broke the ceasfire agreement that ended the first gulf war?

Only a republican, not that i'm a republican i'm libertarian =), can state a fact and then be accused of being narrow minded.

You know you've outwitted democrats when there best responses are you're a loud mouth, beer sweeling white trash. Of course it isn't that hard so not really much of an accomplishment.

Varus
#36 Jul 22 2004 at 4:44 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
By: pickleprince

1961 posts
Score: Default [2.15]


Thanks for the rate-down, Bush-fu[i][/i]cker.

That doesn't change the fact that me and most of the country are giving Bush the ultimate rate-down in November. So, nyah nyah nyah.
#37 Jul 22 2004 at 4:48 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,858 posts
pickleprince wrote:
Quote:
By: pickleprince

1961 posts
Score: Default [2.15]


Thanks for the rate-down, Bush-fu[i][/i]cker.

That doesn't change the fact that me and most of the country are giving Bush the ultimate rate-down in November. So, nyah nyah nyah.


Bush-f[b][/b]ucker is not necessarily a bad thing. You've been in SF too long.
#38 Jul 22 2004 at 4:51 PM Rating: Good
[***************** is not necessarily a bad thing. You've been in SF too long.[/quote]
LOL Priceless!
#39 Jul 22 2004 at 4:57 PM Rating: Decent
Hehe...guess I shoulda said "DubyaFu[i][/i]cker".

D'oh!
#40 Jul 22 2004 at 5:02 PM Rating: Decent
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,126666,00.html

Speaking of imminent threats? Oh yeah, thats right Ashcroft is a sock puppet of the vast right wing conspiracy.. Yeah, keep telling yourself that.
#41 Jul 22 2004 at 5:08 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Yeah, keep telling yourself that.


Just like you keep telling yourself Fox News is a real news source.

10-4, good buddy.

Oh yeah....fu[/i]ck right on back to the Army of Fu[i]cking Kefka will ya?

Mercy Buckets, Moan Sewer.
#42 Jul 22 2004 at 5:10 PM Rating: Decent
Ah so now because Fox is reporting it it can't be true. Can you say dellusional.

Everyone knows that the rabid bush haters will ignore anything that could change their view of bush. They're so full of hatred that all rational thought is out the door.

Varus
#43 Jul 22 2004 at 5:13 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
Quote:
We are only doing now, under strong leadership, doing what no other country in europe was willing to do, sound familiar <cough> ww2.


Listen you ignorant ******, the US were very VERY late in arriving for WWII. Hundreds of thousands of troops were already dead.
#44 Jul 22 2004 at 5:14 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Everyone knows that the rabid bush haters will ignore anything that could change their view of bush. They're so full of hatred that all rational thought is out the door.


Doesn't matter. In a few more months, we won't have to worry about that idiot anymore. It's a moot point, now ain't it?
#45 Jul 22 2004 at 5:18 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Listen you ignorant @#%^er, the US were very VERY late in arriving for WWII. Hundreds of thousands of troops were already dead.

No kidding, we were dragged, particularly the Republican Party kicking and screaming into WW2 by Roosevelt.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#46 Jul 22 2004 at 5:21 PM Rating: Decent
From isolationists to world police.

From abolitionists to racists.

Republicans invented the wishy-washy bullsh[i][/i]it that they always accuse Democrats of doing.
#47 Jul 22 2004 at 5:40 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
No kidding, we were dragged, particularly the Republican Party kicking and screaming into WW2 by Roosevelt.
Dead right smash.

There are numerous records of Churchill (pre Pearl Harbor) telling the rest of Europe that without the support of USA, we were screwed.

Yes, there are arguments about whether uncle Sam could've helped out earlier, but without the US, we Brits would be speaking German and walking a long way to find a Synagogue.

And as for the French (much as I love the French peeps I know), they'd still be planting trees along the Champs Elysee so the Germans could march in the shade.

Oh wait. . . they still are Smiley: wink
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#49 Jul 22 2004 at 6:52 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
A) terrorist camps destroyed and scattered
B) Dictator out of power
C) Terrible abuses and censorship greatly reduced
D) Atrocoties by the likes of the Hussein family ended
E) A new freedom given to the Iraqi people
F) Which cost lives. Every freedom comes with a cost.


Have these been accomplished? Or have the perpetrators just changed?

More to the point - what are we doing there now?
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#51 Jul 22 2004 at 6:57 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
We're putting the Baath Party people right back in charge.

I guess they were only evil while Saddam was around.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 293 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (293)