Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Britain's Intelligence Found to also not be IntelligentFollow

#1 Jul 14 2004 at 8:04 AM Rating: Decent
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/international/AP-Britain-Iraq-Intelligence.html?hp

I think they should stop calling it intelligence and name it something more appropriate, perhaps "Stuff we think that could maybe happen one day according to highly erroneous and unreliable sources."

I suppose Intelligence saves on printing costs.
#2 Jul 14 2004 at 8:49 AM Rating: Default
*** clown, im not signing up to read ANYTHING on the NYT.

And they have more conviction and support for their own intelligence, and they explain why. Instead of the senate being pissy and arguing and wasting gov't expenses.
#3 Jul 14 2004 at 9:17 AM Rating: Decent
It's an AP release.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/B/BRITAIN_IRAQ_INTELLIGENCE?SITE=VTRUT&SECTION=HOME

On occasion, the NYT has good editorials.
#4 Jul 14 2004 at 12:44 PM Rating: Decent
The New York Times is a decent publication that at least is not run by the crazed despot of a crackpot religion.
#5 Jul 14 2004 at 12:53 PM Rating: Decent
priministers questions was on BBC 2 this morning when i got up, it was crap, they ask a question, he avoids answering, they take the **** out of him, he denies everything and avoids talking about anything.

what the deal with the crap intellegence tony?

erm well you see erm, we were right to go into iraq, shut up i'm in charge here, you don't know anything you herbert.

eejit

erm well you see erm, we were right to go into iraq, shut up i'm in charge here, you don't know anything you herbert.

so you deny it?

erm well you see erm, we were right to go into iraq, shut up i'm in charge here, you don't know anything you herbert.

that was pretty much the conversation
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 202 All times are in CST
Gidono, Anonymous Guests (201)