Edwars was the right choice.Follow

Kerry made the right move by picking Edwards. Edwards puts two more states into play for the Democrats and his youthfull appearance contasts well with Cheny's ill health and picks up women voters as well.

I'd say it's nearly impossible for Bush to win now. I can't think of a scenario where he has any shot.

Yeah. But will he make decisions as VP based on conversations with dead people? I've gotta admit that'll go over really well at state dinners!

Or is that another John Edwards?...

We should leave America's wang out of it entirely. Remember what happened last time? I'd not make such declarative statements about which way a state will go, you never know, except for Alaska, their 2 electoral votes are guaranteed Republican.

Edwards is anti-big business do you really think that is going to help Kerry? He was a trial lawyer against big business and now the ticket is nothing about Special Interest.

Edwards is anti-big business do you really think that is going to help Kerry?


Of course it will. These are Deomcratic voters we're talking about.

Remember this election isn't about changing people's minds, it's about TURNOUT.

Bush changes people's minds every day on his own.

Never dis the Gitslayer vote! Regardless we will vote for whoever gets that big fat embarassment out of office.

Yeah, they called and said they're waiting for you when your done sucking Smasharoo.

Hey Smashie don't forget to slap pickledick on the back of the head to make him swallow.

So, don't like trial lawyers?

/shrug

There are some bad examples, like your mentioning of OJ, but I don't think they are all bad. Some just do their job.

Edited, Tue Jul 6 20:48:22 2004 by CrimsonMagician

As a rule, trial lawyers are part of the problem, not part of the solution. Case in point? High medical fees for health care due to malpractice insurance. Higher prices for every form of consumer goods due to costly litigation for "bad" designs. Shall I go on?

Trial lawyers are the leaking pustule nestled between the gigantic cheeks of an unwashed yeti's a$$.

Totem

As opposed to the current occupant of the Oval Office, who makes decisions based on the voices in his head and then calls it God's Will.

This is verbatim from this thread.

British vernacular for a person who is deemed to be despicable or contemptible.

git n. Tricky one to define. What it doesn't mean is what The Waltons meant when they said it (as in "git outta here, John-Boy"). Git is technically an insult but has a twinge of jealousy to it. You'd call someone a git if they'd won the Readers' Digest Prize Draw, outsmarted you in a battle of wits or been named in Bill Gates' Last Will and Testament because of a spelling mistake. Like sod, it has a friendly tone to it. I'm told it derives from Arabic, where it describes a pregnant camel, of all things. I'm also told that it is a contraction of the word "illegitimate" - you be the judge.

To put it another way: I tended to have sh*t equipment because, well on a zek sever(EQ's PvP server), you lose a PvP battle they get to take an item, so I tended to be ticked off everyone else had better stuff than me (I lost as much as I won but the ****** would bag their stuff [You could only pick from what they didn't bag] before they died hense I didn't have much worth picking through) so killing a "git" was insult and praise in the same breath. An insult because I killed them even though they had better equipment and praise because he bloody well had better equipment.

I have several british friends who think its funny to try to confuse the stupid yank, I had picked up on much of their slang quickly.

He neglected to mention the other definition of git: An INS evading Mexican toting lawn cutting implements from the back of his Chevy Luv pickup.

Totem