Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

POLICE!! SEARCH ALERT!!Follow

#52 Jul 06 2004 at 7:45 AM Rating: Excellent
Aw come'n no balls no glory. I want to hear how a user is not a reason for the war on drugs. Come on I'll play, I love to hear the other side.
#53 Jul 06 2004 at 7:53 AM Rating: Decent
**
874 posts
Do you want that? Really? Do you want another 15 page paper on the beginnings of the WOD and marijuana prohibition? Come on man, everyone hates reading here, especially if it's longer then a paragraph. Why do you think they rag on Gbaji all the time?

Sides, I'm staying out of it, remember? :)
I'm too high strung to trust myself to be semi-respectable and polite on this subject matter.

Edited, Tue Jul 6 08:55:54 2004 by Molish
#54 Jul 06 2004 at 9:13 AM Rating: Decent
lol i believe mj should be legal and that the only reason it's not is too many politicians have been made very rich either fighting it or trafficing it. Did you know know mj is the second biggest cash crop in the u.s. and these politicians aren't getting a cut of that...right

Varus
#55 Jul 06 2004 at 9:22 AM Rating: Decent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
It sems to me that had you been alive during the days of slavery you would have the same oppinion of abolitionists...and would have been the type of scum to turn in escaped slaves...


I'm eager to see how getting busted with an ashtray full of seeds and stems can justifiably be compared to risking your life to save others.

Go for it, Ms. Tubman.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#56 Jul 06 2004 at 1:07 PM Rating: Default
Kelv: It sucks. Move to California if you like to do drugs.

Mrens: Go back in your cave, you fuc[/i]king troglodyte. You don't even have a fu[i]cking job and you're criticizing drug users. I just got back from L.A. partying with half of fricking Harvard Business School. (They are all loser drug users)

So, shut your round-assed pimp-filled Shrek face, mmmkay?!?

Kthx.

#57 Jul 06 2004 at 1:49 PM Rating: Decent
**
874 posts
BAM!

Every time I read one of pickles' posts, I like him more and more. Dat guy just don't **** around. Reminds me of Denis Leary saying "Life sucks get a fu`cking helmet"
Hey, that could be sig material.


Edited, Tue Jul 6 14:53:53 2004 by Molish
#58 Jul 06 2004 at 2:43 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
A small time pot dealer? No, I'd feel silly.

I also wouldn't bring a SWAT team to arrest someone for Jwalking.


Small time pot dealers can own guns too, and their guns can make you just as dead friend. I think you suggesting that police don't take every precaution in order to protect themselves from harm, or quite possibly death, in order to prevent hurting someones feelings or giving the impression of overkill is retarded. Besides, how many of these little cry babies sit in their rooms and talk all that tough **** until the real world comes crashing through their front door? Serves the spoiled brats right.

Oh, btw, Mrens...please post as many times a day as possible. Need more level headed, real world livin' people in here.

Quote:
Mrens: Go back in your cave, you ******* troglodyte. You don't even have a ******* job and you're criticizing drug users. I just got back from L.A. partying with half of fricking Harvard Business School. (They are all loser drug users)


Really! Are you a cool kid now?

Edited, Tue Jul 6 15:49:19 2004 by xtremereign
#59 Jul 06 2004 at 2:49 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Oh, btw, Mrens...please post as many times a day as possible. Need more level headed, real world livin' people in here.


This proves that you aren't anti-drug. Put down the pipe. Just put it down. Kthx.

#60 Jul 06 2004 at 4:36 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,563 posts
Message has high abuse count and will not be displayed.
#61 Jul 06 2004 at 4:43 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Hi, I have a job dipsh*t, care to try again?


Go fu[/i]cking smoke a joint and shut the fu[i]ck up.

Is that better, my little gargoyle?

HBS is graduate school, you fu[i][/i]cking twit. Of course, a Mr. Mc(blow)Job like you would never know that.
#62 Jul 06 2004 at 4:47 PM Rating: Decent
I havn't read anything about this but did the police have a search warrant?

Varus
#63 Jul 06 2004 at 5:28 PM Rating: Default
I read the whole thread. Smiley: banghead

Kelv, bummer dude.

Mrens, wishing that he get butt ****** in jail for smoking pot or by your standards, being an idiot, is as low as a human can get that can type on a message board.

For the rest of you. I've seen a semi-small time pot dealer have a fetish for M-16's. Doesn't take much to save up for one.
#64 Jul 06 2004 at 6:09 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,311 posts
For the record, I'm in favor of legalization and have been known to partake.

That being said, don't live with someone who sells drugs, even small time. That's just trouble waiting to happen.

To the angels of this board who keep raising the "it's illegal so you're wrong no matter what" point, please shut up until you can honestly say you comply with every law, at all times.

I'm pretty sure a lot of people broke the sodomy laws regularly with nary a thought to the illegality of their actions. That's right, citizens took it upon themselves to decide a law was unreasonable and broke it willfully.
#65 Jul 06 2004 at 6:13 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Yeah Smash, because middle class white kids have never came out with Guns blazing.


Shut the fuc[b][/b]k up. Colombine wasn't two kids smoking weed. There's no comarison. If they were going to bust them for having illegal guns and pipe bombs I wouldn't have a problem with it.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#66 Jul 06 2004 at 6:29 PM Rating: Good
*
116 posts
So why did Kelvy edit his post? Putting incriminating evidence on the internet prior to your court date, did you realize just how stoopid you where?

Quote:
To the angels of this board who keep raising the "it's illegal so you're wrong no matter what" point, please shut up until you can honestly say you comply with every law, at all times.


I didn't see anyone proclaiming to be innocent of any "crimes", and if you ask me, yeah I have had speeding tickets but I paid my fines and moved on. But you don't see people coming to the Asylum and saying hey everybody look at me I got arrested because my room mate is a small time drug dealer and my supplier. I have a court date on Dec 1 and now don't I look cool because the "man" has made me a victim of the drug war.

You're the one that made the connection to Columbine Smuckaroo, I did not see the author of that line making that insuation. Jesus, you left wingers on this board are so anti establishment it is getting ******* ridiculous.

So Kelvy why did you delete the OP?
#67 Jul 06 2004 at 6:50 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Platanum wrote:

You're the one that made the connection to Columbine Smuckaroo, I did not see the author of that line making that insuation. Jesus, you left wingers on this board are so anti establishment it is getting ******* ridiculous.


Eh? I'd guess that the link to one of theColumbine killers would have been the "connection" Smash was making.

The point is that we are just hearing one side of the story. We don't know what the cops thought was going on there, nor what they were told was going on there.

Or should they just assume that if it's a couple middle class white kids, that they'll be ok just showing up at the door and asking politely if they can check the premises for dope, but if it was a couple poor black kids, then they should pull out the riot gear?

I'd think that a liberal would appreciate a couple of white kids getting the same treatment as the brothers in the ghetto. Or maybe some people just have to find a way to accuse athority of mismanagement no matter what is done...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#68 Jul 06 2004 at 6:54 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
I'd think that a liberal would appreciate a couple of white kids getting the same treatment as the brothers in the ghetto.


No, a "liberal" would appreciate no one getting that treatment.

But, then, that's what you get when you "try" to think.

#69 Jul 06 2004 at 6:58 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

You're the one that made the connection to Columbine Smuckaroo, I did not see the author of that line making that insuation. Jesus, you left wingers on this board are so anti establishment it is getting @#%^ing ridiculous.


Read the fuc[/b]king posts you pathetic poster child for condom use. I don't mind arguing with ignorat morons, I do it all the time, but people who are too lazy to click on an in context link without which the post makes no sense is a little much.

I realize that you right wing people are indoctrinated not to think and to just follow whatever orders your given by the Grand Wizard, be it burning houses down or dragging black people from trucks, but in the absense of those orders can't you at least FUC[B]
KING TRY NOT TO LET THE ENTIRE GROUP OF PEOPLE WHO THINK AS YOU DO DOWN BY BEING SO BLANTLY ABSENT OF INTELLIGENCE????

Come on, now, I'd like to break a sweat here someday, don't make it so easy.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#70 Jul 06 2004 at 7:10 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
pickleprince wrote:
Quote:
I'd think that a liberal would appreciate a couple of white kids getting the same treatment as the brothers in the ghetto.


No, a "liberal" would appreciate no one getting that treatment.

But, then, that's what you get when you "try" to think.


So there are no conditions underwhich our police should wear body armor and assume that the criminals in the home they are raiding might be armed? Is that what you're saying?

It's just that I'm reasonably certain that the cops formed SWAT units as a result of instances of finding themselves outgunned by the criminals, not the other way around...


Or are you saying that a liberal would just prefer that no laws ever get enforced? Or just the criminals that you think should be punished? If that's the case, then why ***** about things like racial profiling? Seems almost like you are advocating it.


As far as the OT goes, I'm pretty much in agreement with Mrens on this one. I strongly believe that drugs should be legalized. I also think it's ridiculous that we spend the amount of effort enforcing those silly laws that we do. However, that's an issue about the law, not those who enforce it. The fact is that drugs are illegal, and they knew it, and they chose to break the law anyway. We can argue all day about whether the laws are "right", but the fact is that they are the law right now. You can choose to break it. I have no problem with that. But then don't complain that it's unfair if/when you get caught.

____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#71 Jul 06 2004 at 7:15 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Or are you saying that a liberal would just prefer that no laws ever get enforced? Or just the criminals that you think should be punished? If that's the case, then why ***** about things like racial profiling? Seems almost like you are advocating it.


Save it. I meant being busted for marijuana, genius.

#72 Jul 06 2004 at 7:22 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
pickleprince wrote:
Quote:
Or are you saying that a liberal would just prefer that no laws ever get enforced? Or just the criminals that you think should be punished? If that's the case, then why ***** about things like racial profiling? Seems almost like you are advocating it.


Save it. I meant being busted for marijuana, genius.


Eh? So am I. So if they were a couple of poor black kids in the ghetto, and the cops had the exact same amount of information (presumed drug dealers), it would be ok to come in guns blazing, but since it's a couple of middle class white kids, it's overkill?

Do you have any idea how many drug busts end up in gunfights? It's not like the cops dress in their body armor for fun you know...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#73 Jul 06 2004 at 7:24 PM Rating: Good
*
116 posts
Smuckaroo, I apologize to you for making an assumption after having breezed the thread at that point and missed the linked. You where right, and I was absolutely wrong. BUt hey don't go blowing a blood vessel on us. :)



Quote:
No, a "liberal" would appreciate no one getting that treatment.


So you are anti-cop. You do not believe the people that go around protecting you and your family should be allowed to protect themselves from potential worst case scenerios when going into a situation that can be deadly? Jesus Christ wake up and face reality you ignorant twit.

#74 Jul 06 2004 at 7:26 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Apology accepted, try not to let it happen again.

Reading is fundemental.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#75 Jul 06 2004 at 7:30 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
I think he'd prefer them to come in unannounced wearing aprons and holding platters of brownies and glasses of Mountain Dew. This new police tactic would involve stuffing the junkies with baked goods until they are too full to resist, thus preying on their munchies weakness. Of course City Hall may complain about increased flour and choclate chip expenditures, but the reduction in civil suits from police brutality accusations will more than offset the new ovens included in the capital budget.

Totem
#76 Jul 06 2004 at 7:33 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I think he'd prefer them to come in unannounced wearing aprons and holding platters of brownies and glasses of Mountain Dew. This new police tactic would involve stuffing the junkies with baked goods until they are too full to resist, thus preying on their munchies weakness. Of course City Hall may complain about increased flour and choclate chip expenditures, but the reduction in civil suits from police brutality accusations will more than offset the new ovens included in the capital budget.


We're talking about a minor drug bust here. We're not talking about Waco.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 193 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (193)