Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Dogs attacked with fireworksFollow

#1 Jun 30 2004 at 7:37 AM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
"The Associated Press." wrote:
Dogs attacked with fireworks
Tuesday, June 29, 2004 Posted: 10:47 PM EDT (0247 GMT)

TULSA, Oklahoma (AP) -- Six puppies were killed, apparently by fireworks placed in their mouths, shortly after teenage boys were seen carrying Roman candles in a north Tulsa neighborhood.

Animal control officers said they were following leads Tuesday but had no suspects in Sunday night's attacks, during which one person told police they heard a puppy yelp.

An older dog, a 41/2-month-old black Labrador mix, suffered burns on her muzzle and hindquarters from apparently being used as a moving target for fireworks.

The Tulsa Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals was caring for the injured dog and for the puppies' mother, a 11/2-year-old black-and-tan heeler mix that was not harmed.

The injured dog had begun to eat and was expected to survive, said Laurie Myers, executive director of the Tulsa SPCA.

The SPCA believes the puppies died from fireworks that exploded in their mouths.

A woman, Tonya Curry, 27, found all the dogs Monday among the remains of fireworks inside a vacant house and took the two survivors to the SPCA. When an animal control officer arrived later, the dead puppies were gone.

"Somebody probably went to clean up their mess so they wouldn't get in trouble," Officer Charity Curtis said.

The SPCA has raised about $1,000 and other organizations were undertaking similar efforts to reward people who provide information leading to the arrest and conviction of those responsible, officials said.



WTF is wrong with people?
____________________________
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere

Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
#2 Jun 30 2004 at 7:42 AM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
There was a big fad doing this with cats around my way... and they didn't only put it in their mouths..


In doing this one's soul can become effected in bad ways..
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#3 Jun 30 2004 at 7:55 AM Rating: Decent
**
874 posts
Those sick son's of ******** How?!?! How could a human being do this to another creature? I don't wish these boys to die, but I want them to feel EXACTLY what they forced those innocent animals to feel.

Ya know, they would kill the dog if it attacked a human. Turnabout is fair play.
#4 Jun 30 2004 at 8:55 AM Rating: Decent
**
862 posts
That really is sick. Kinda put a damper on my day now...
#5 Jun 30 2004 at 11:44 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
Quote:
WTF is wrong with people?


I'm with you, so much easier (and less messy) to tie a weight to the collar and chuck it in the river.
#6 Jun 30 2004 at 11:48 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,980 posts
If they wanted a show they shoulda put the puppies in an oven or a microwave
#7 Jul 01 2004 at 4:10 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
Some raters have no sense of humour.
#8 Jul 01 2004 at 5:01 AM Rating: Decent
There's no excuse for harming an animal. A puppy at that. Those adorable little eyes staring up at you as they wag their butts on the ground just a'waitin' to pounce on you and lick your face sloppy wet. Just like a good woman. Only furrier. And some women are toilet trained.
But usually people who start off hurting animals end up as sadistic sociopaths and/or serial killers. Not cereal. Or surreal.
#9 Jul 01 2004 at 5:04 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,571 posts
I've never got the animal kindness nuts.


It's a ******* animal. Not an intelligent being. Anyone saying a human should go under the same treatment as that of an animal needs to go get their priorities straight.

Reminds me of the head of PETA. "I'd rather swerve and hit a human than run over a dog."
#10 Jul 01 2004 at 5:13 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
Still, sticking a firework up an animal's *** is taking your sentiments a bit far.
#11 Jul 01 2004 at 5:17 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,571 posts
I never said I agreed with what they did - I don't. But saying that turnabout is fair play, when one thing is sentient and the other isn't, it taking it way too far.
#12 Jul 01 2004 at 7:11 AM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
I'm pretty sure that dogs have the ability to experiencing sensation and feeling. This is reflected by the fact that they react to external stimulis. They are also intelligent enoungh to discern the difference between others of their species and even humans. It's exhibited by the fact they form packs. They recognize an Alpha pack leader. They act in ways intended to please the Alpha leader. Hence, they will gladly expose thier weak areas to a leader yet rip apart a percieved threat. I assure you that dogs are indeed intelligent, they also fully capable of displaying their emotions.

They are fully aware of their suroundings, and I would venture to guess that they were fully aware of the terrible pain that an exploding firework in their mouths caused during their last few moments of life.

What those teenagers did was wrong, they should be punished for thier actions in an attempt to teach them and others to value life.

Edited, Thu Jul 1 08:13:25 2004 by xythex
____________________________
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere

Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
#13 Jul 01 2004 at 7:57 AM Rating: Good
***
2,196 posts
Quote:
when one thing is sentient and the other isn't, it taking it way too far.


Obviously you've never owned a dog or cat - both are quite sentient. Maybe you just have the term, "sentient" confused with something else.

Quote:
sentient

\Sen"ti*ent\, a. [L. sentiens, -entis, p. pr. of sentire to discern or perceive by the senses. See Sense.] Having a faculty, or faculties, of sensation and perception. Specif. (Physiol.), especially sensitive; as, the sentient extremities of nerves, which terminate in the various organs or tissues.

____________________________
'Lo, there do I see, the line of my people, back to the beginning, 'lo do they call to me, they bid me take my place among them, in the halls of Valhalla, where the brave...may live...forever.

X-Box 360 Gamer Tag - Smogster
#14 Jul 01 2004 at 8:02 AM Rating: Good
The kids should be punished, certainly. But truth be told, if they were being raised properly, the incident would most likely have never occurred.

It takes a village to raise a child? ********* Every village has its village drunk and that's NOT where I'd want my kids to get their values. Values are learned. It takes a mother, a father, and actual training at home.

Too bad most people can't be bothered. They'd rather let their kids get values from TV, school, church, anywhere other than actually teaching the child themselves. Then, when the kid tosses their *** into a cut-rate retirement home at first opportunity and never visit them, they wonder if they even know the person thast is their child. Serves em right. Society is self-inflicted.
#15 Jul 01 2004 at 8:04 AM Rating: Decent
**
874 posts
Quote:

Posted @ Thu, Jul 1st 6:04 AM 2004
By: Chtulhu the Quick
Scholar

Reminds me of the head of PETA. "I'd rather swerve and hit a human than run over a dog."


First off, I won't swerve for anything. I'm no gonna put my life and the lives of others on the road at risk cuz a ******* chipmunk thinks he's immortal. That doesnt mean I won't slam my brakes as hard as I can while praying for the poor *******.
Go ahead, say it. Say I'm putting the lives of the people following behind me at risk. You already know my answer to that (and the Laws' answer, interestingly enough), so don't bother.

That being said, there is a HUGE difference between that and shoving an explosive up another living, sentient, intelligent form of life's ******.

So, my priorities are in disarray because I believe that all living things that stand on the same earth as I do deserve the same respect as me?

I call *********


Edit: Had to add some stuff. Was a bit contradicting from the 1st and last paragraph.



Edited, Thu Jul 1 09:41:10 2004 by Molish
#16 Jul 01 2004 at 12:04 PM Rating: Good
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that I don't advocate mutilating and killing puppies with fireworks.

I know, I know....I'm a freak.

Eb
#17 Jul 01 2004 at 1:41 PM Rating: Decent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Patrician wrote:
so much easier (and less messy) to tie a weight to the collar and chuck it in the river.
On that note, does anyone else keep pet Giant Pandas?

I've had a pair for a few years now and they breed like bloddy Rabbits - already I've had to drown 4 litters. Is it just me?
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#18 Jul 01 2004 at 1:43 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
pickleprince wrote:
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that I don't advocate mutilating and killing puppies with fireworks.


All other methods are fine, though.
#19 Jul 01 2004 at 1:46 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
All other methods are fine, though.


You could also infer that killing or mutilating other things is fine.

Just sayin'

Eb
#20 Jul 01 2004 at 1:47 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
pickleprince wrote:
Quote:
All other methods are fine, though.


You could also infer that killing or mutilating other things is fine.

Just sayin'

Eb


Ah, true...

I need more caffiene.
#21 Jul 01 2004 at 1:50 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

In this context, Chtulhu means "sentient" as conscious or aware. As in, we humans are conscious of our own existence, whereas animals operate solely on instinct or trained behavior.
#22 Jul 01 2004 at 2:00 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,980 posts
Quote:
As in, we humans are conscious of our own existence, whereas animals operate solely on instinct or trained behavior.


But Chuthlu's argument falls apart when anyone tries to describe how we know we exist. The old adage is that "I think therefore I am."

Animals can think, therefore they are.
#23 Jul 01 2004 at 2:10 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Animals can think, therefore they are.


Therefore you aren't.

Eb
#24 Jul 01 2004 at 8:14 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,311 posts
Jeffrey Dahmer liked to play with small animals too.

To me, that's a pretty good indication of what kind of person does this to animals.
#25 Jul 01 2004 at 8:41 PM Rating: Default
If I hear or read another thing about the abuse to cute animals, I'll go on a killing spree.
All people care abput are the cute animals. What about the others? All this bull **** about dolphin safe tuna. I say dolphine tastes better than tuna, so what about tuna safe dolphin.
#26 Jul 01 2004 at 9:13 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
I'm with you, so much easier (and less messy) to tie a weight to the collar and chuck it in the river.


naww im all for the fireworks
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 170 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (170)