I have heard criticisms from both sides about the pro's and con's to us being in the mid-east.
What I want to know is what should be done about the current situation...bear in mind that radical muslims are on the attack.
Varus
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- What can be done
What can be doneFollow
The bear I have in mind is a Grizzly.
Gentle Ben?
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
I keep a panda bear in mind at all times.
I prefer Koalas to Pandas.
If life gives you lemons, make lemonade. Then find someone that life has given vodka and have party.
This establishment does not serve women. You must bring your own.
This establishment does not serve women. You must bring your own.
Koalas are not even bears, they are marsupials.
Brear Bear from Song of the South. I like to go to Disneyland and visit him on Spalsh Mountain.
Quote:
Koalas are not even bears, they are marsupials.
Pandas aren't either.. they're big-*** racoons.
I honestly don't know what family the Panda is from.
There is a little bit of a debate if the Panda is more Bear or more Racoon.
Its been classified as bear for long time but now they are starting to think its more Racoon than bear.
Scientists like to debate so there we go.
Its been classified as bear for long time but now they are starting to think its more Racoon than bear.
Scientists like to debate so there we go.
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
bhodisattva Defender of Justice wrote:
There is a little bit of a debate if the Panda is more Bear or more Racoon.
Its been classified as bear for long time but now they are starting to think its more Racoon than bear.
Scientists like to debate so there we go.
Its been classified as bear for long time but now they are starting to think its more Racoon than bear.
Scientists like to debate so there we go.
Thank you for that.
The tought that perhaps pandas were not always classified as bears did cross my mind.
But they're the cutest, so I have to stick with them.
But they're the cutest, so I have to stick with them.
The current problem in the Middle East is probably beyond repair, as much as I hate to admit a defeat it is time to do so. We need to withdraw and do what the current administration has neglected for so long and actually fund the fight against terror rather then put a big ******* bulleye on ourseleves and our allies and say terrorists strike here.
If you havn't noticed the terrorists have been striking only no one has paid attention until now when we've actually taken the fight to the mid east.
examples... the cole, the first twin towers bombing, the train bombing in spain, the czhechian (bah spell check couldn't help me) rebels in russia, and good lord look at israel and the list goes on all the back into the 80's. The attacks have increasingly become more bold.
So we should fund terrorists to fight terrorists and get our so-called allies to help fund this so we can avoid making ourselves a target to further enrage these radicals?
Varus
p.s. i like how the local board dems responded to this post but that is to be expected when actually trying to deal with an issue rather than rant.
Edited, Tue Jun 29 17:59:24 2004 by varrussword
examples... the cole, the first twin towers bombing, the train bombing in spain, the czhechian (bah spell check couldn't help me) rebels in russia, and good lord look at israel and the list goes on all the back into the 80's. The attacks have increasingly become more bold.
So we should fund terrorists to fight terrorists and get our so-called allies to help fund this so we can avoid making ourselves a target to further enrage these radicals?
Varus
p.s. i like how the local board dems responded to this post but that is to be expected when actually trying to deal with an issue rather than rant.
Edited, Tue Jun 29 17:59:24 2004 by varrussword
We took the fight to a country unreallated to terrorist attacks, and gave a huge amount of money to the country most responsible for them.
That'll show em!
That'll show em!
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Quote:
Cry havoc and let slip the bullsh[i][/i]it of Var!
El fixo this por tu, senor.
Eb
And by unrelated you mean having open meetings with known taliban and al quada agents on a consistent basis right?
Oh and the 911 commission did find that there were connections between saddam and al quada just nothing to indicate iraq directly participated in 911. I know they were just discussing what to do the goaly if they lost a soccer game.
Varus
Oh and the 911 commission did find that there were connections between saddam and al quada just nothing to indicate iraq directly participated in 911. I know they were just discussing what to do the goaly if they lost a soccer game.
Varus
And by unrelated you mean having open meetings with known taliban and al quada agents on a consistent basis right?
We had Taliban represenatives on a tour of the US in 2000. Does that mean we're behind it?
By unrelated, I mean un re fuc[/b]king lated.
As in no evidence of any ties, no proof of any relation, nothing
Unrelated.
Understand yet?
[b]
Oh and the 911 commission did find that there were connections between saddam and al quada just nothing to indicate iraq directly participated in 911. I know they were just discussing what to do the goaly if they lost a soccer game.
Look, believe whatever you'd like. The facts clearly aren't going to stand in your way. Lack of evidence is the same as a smoking gun now. Let's send people to invade countries and die over it.
You need to join the military and have someone shoot an inch from your head so you can understand the importance of having actual evidence.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Smasharoo wrote:
We took the fight to a country unreallated to terrorist attacks, and gave a huge amount of money to the country most responsible for them.
That'll show em!
That'll show em!
Just a point here Smash. You are arguing a semantic issue. It's not about who is "related to terrorist attacks".
I assume you are talking about Iraq being "unrelated to terrorist attacks", and Saudi Arabia being "most responsible for them".
Let's take what the administration is really doing:
They are targeting the country most likely to sponsor and supply terrorists in their attacks. And are aiding the nation least likely to sponsor and supply said terrorists.
Ever notice that while there are a lot of Saudi terrorists nationaliaty wise, they always tend to move to nations like Iraq and Afghanistan and Libya to actually conduct their terrorist operations? The nationality is not the issue here. It's a matter of stopping nations who have *openly* supported terrorist groups. Iraq certainly fit that description to a tee.
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Recent Visitors: 210
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (210)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- What can be done
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC