Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 Next »
Reply To Thread

7 of 9, nope...6 of 9!Follow

#77 Jun 28 2004 at 12:06 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Yeah, well, I can intellectually kick your a$$ any day of the week and twice on Sunday, so me dying is about your only hope.

Totem
#78 Jun 28 2004 at 12:09 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Yeah, well, I can intellectually kick your a$$ any day of the week and twice on Sunday, so me dying is about your only hope.


Umm, sure you can. If it gets you through the day....go ahead think that.

Eb

Funny you spelled a[i][/i]ss with dollars signs, cause you know my "***" is so money.
#79 Jun 28 2004 at 12:42 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
It ain't braggin' when it's the truth. And the only thing about your a$$ that's money are the dollar bills stuck to the dried up man juice from your johns who toss that caysh on your backside after installing an HIV lane* on your Hershey highway.

You certain you wanna play this game, pickle? I don't play nice once we come out of our corners fighting.

Totem

* A play on words for the terminally stupid around here
#80 Jun 28 2004 at 12:49 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
I like it when Totem is in a happy mood.

Happy, happy, joy, joy!!


____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#81 Jun 28 2004 at 12:55 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
It ain't braggin' when it's the truth. And the only thing about your a$$ that's money are the dollar bills stuck to the dried up man juice from your johns who toss that caysh on your backside after installing an HIV lane* on your Hershey highway.



You really think you are smarter than me?

Prove it with something besides your ****-erotictization of your warped idea of who I am. (Bi[i][/i]tch) :)

Eb
#82 Jun 28 2004 at 1:10 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
No question about it. And I've been proving it on a daily basis since you've started posting here, son. And while you got some game, no doubt about it, I'd have you piddling on yourself in abject demonstrations of submission in no time.

Totem
#83 Jun 28 2004 at 1:13 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
No question about it. And I've been proving it on a daily basis since you've started posting here, son. And while you got some game, no doubt about it, I'd have you piddling on yourself in abject demonstrations of submission in no time.


I suppose we should just take your word for it, Chopper Dave?

PROVE IT! All those helicopter engines made you go deaf or are you just old?

Eb
#84 Jun 28 2004 at 1:25 PM Rating: Decent
Smasharoo wrote:

Eisenhower got us entagnled in Vietnam by tying our policy there with the French forces. He resisted sending troops, but sent massive amounts of aid. Kennedy followed what Eisenhower suggested for Indochina policy. Combat troops didn't land in South Vietnam until '65. If you want to blame someone you have two choices


Eisenhower might have gotten us into Vietnam but Kennedy kept us there and escalated the conflict and eventually it was Nixon that got us out. Also fyi the concrete companies that poured concrete for roads, buildings, etc... was owned by the kennedy family. So the Kennedy's actually had no interest in seeing the war end as their contract would have been called in.

I know what you're saying well look at Halliburton and Cheney...well Cheney actually did resign his position well before he became vice-president, can the same be said of the boot-legging kennedys?

Varus
#85 Jun 28 2004 at 3:48 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

What he did was get less US troops killed during his entire term than died in a month in Iraq. Hanging the deaths of 50,000 during the LBJ administration on him is idiotic.


How is comparing the two relevant Smash?

I don't think you can make a comparison between military deaths in a nation that you aren't officially "at war" with, with deaths from al bona-fied military action (with congressional approval and all). They're just completely different animals. Why pick Iraq Smash? I'm sure our casuality rates during WW2 were even higher, right? Get the difference? One is a war. The other is a president chosing to put US soldiers in harms way while pretending that he really isn't.

The biggest complaint about Vietnam wasn't so much the backwards way we got into it, but the fact that it was never officially a war. This, more then anything, made people question the numbers of deaths. And whether you deny it or not, Kennedy very clearly started that process.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#86 Jun 28 2004 at 4:41 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,311 posts
Quote:
And while you got some game, no doubt about it, I'd have you piddling on yourself in abject demonstrations of submission in no time.

Totem
Didn't we see this type of claim just a few months ago, with less than spectacular results?
#88 Jun 28 2004 at 6:02 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Yes, Yanari, we have seen this before, but in my particular case I made good on my claim. I figure it's a little like Last Comic Standing. I know I'm funnier than pickle in a heads up competition.

Totem
#89 Jun 28 2004 at 6:10 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Yes, Yanari, we have seen this before, but in my particular case I made good on my claim. I figure it's a little like Last Comic Standing. I know I'm funnier than pickle in a heads up competition.



Sure, T.C., prove this knowledge.

http://www.tvtome.com/tvtome/servlet/PersonDetail/personid-15493

Eb

Obviously, Yan is betting on me
1 2 3 4 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 267 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (267)