Seems they beheaded anotherFollow

Ok, I know I said I would not post here again. That is sick, wrong, and absolutley burn-in-hell type offensive. I cannot imagine what kind of sick **** would make a site like that, but I hope they die a horribly slow painful death only to be brought back and made do it again. The same goes for the reporters who are now hounding this poor family. I know our "generation" in desensitized but my god, do we have to be complete incompassionate bastards to top it?? They even want the video?? Hatred is the only word I can fathom to use at this point to describe my loathing of ignorant ***** that get off on **** like that. I understand this is war, and to some he is just another casualty, but I pray for that poor man's family, and for his murderers. It is wrong in the utmost to post that kind of ****.

Its better for video. That's it.

It's not a bad way to die, all things considered. Had they killed him with a weed whacker over the course of eight hours I'd be the first to say how horrible it was. Getting beheaded isn't particularly painful compared to nearly any other way of dying.

It's not "barbaric". To term it such implies a moral superiority for people who kill other people by strapping them to a chair and running electricity to it. Would it have been less "barbaric" if they had sedated him to unconciousness and then poisoned him?

It's easy to want to demonize the people as opposed to the action and terms like "barbaric" only hasten that. Killing is terrible, the method is incidental.

Being beheaded isn't a very painful way to die.

No, I don't think any event where it takes you ten seconds or less to die is going to qualify as a particularly painfull method.

By the power of deductive reasoning. If you're dead five seconds after the pain the starts, that's going to be better than, lets say getting shot in the gut and slowly bleeding to death over a few days.

How can it possibly be described as "painfull" if you die almost instnatly??

By your argument all methods of dying are equally painful as no one can tell us how it felt, being dead and all.

In that case it's clearly no worse of a way to die than any other.

Edited, Sat Jun 19 17:15:11 2004 by Smasharoo

hmm i think the worse way to die would be having water drip on your forehead untill it drilled thru your head. or having your limbs cut off, and left to bleed to death. that would prolly suck.

anyways, how the hell do u know it isnt a bad way to die? have u ever been beheaded? i didnt think so. im sure any way to die, other than to die of natural causes is really crappy. wait, im sure dieing of natural causes sucks too, cuz your f*ing dead.

Hence the term, "coming and going"

So you'd have the same feelings about some Iraqi guy that had nothing to do with the war but was killed by a bombing or was an innocent bystander in a firefight?

Just curious.

On to the topic: It's terrible, but sadly, it's also not newsworthy to this extent.

Grady

How about having each of your fingernails and toenails slowly ripped off?

I wish I hadn't heard it, but I did. Out here in LA they played it on the radio (KFI, John and Ken Show, about 3PM the day after the story broke). I heard it. It was awful.

Nope, because money still rules our lives. As long as the offer is high enough, some contracter will fly some men over to these countries to try and re-build while only managing to get them captured and beheaded.

I know what the tapes have taught me: When beheading civilians to evoke emotion, use dull blades so as to make the execution long and painful. If after one beheading you have not recieved adequate response nor taught your message completely, you must repeat as necessary.