trickybeck the Sly wrote:
Now I'm curious.
Please post a link to the complete report, and quote passages that support your point.
Hehe. I like the avatar too...
Sockpuppet or not, how about this
article:
Woah! They changed the story. CNN is playing games here folks.
Yesterday, I quoted this story, and these two paragraphs were in order in the story:
Quote:
The panel said it found "no credible evidence that Iraq and al Qaeda cooperated on attacks against the United States."
The report contradicts statements from the Bush administration that Saddam Hussein had ties to al Qaeda
Today, the two paragraphs read differently:
Quote:
The panel said it found "no credible evidence that Iraq and al Qaeda cooperated on attacks against the United States."
The Bush administration has said the terrorist network and Iraq were linked.
Odd...
Also. this is the story that started my post about Media bias:
Quote:
In September, Cheney said Iraq had been "the geographic base of the terrorists who have had us under assault now for many years, but most especially on 9/11."
Bush, responding to criticism of Cheney's comment, said there was no evidence Saddam's government was linked to the September 11 attacks.
This one is absolutely rife with plugged in critisism only thinly related to the story. They spend about 1/3rd of the article actually providing information revealed by the 9/11 commision, and the other 2/3rds misquoting Bush officials in ways intended to make it look like they lied.
CNN is horrible for this btw.