Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Micheal Moore BlowsFollow

#27 Jun 17 2004 at 1:46 PM Rating: Good
Sometimes I wish Liberals were out to take over and subjugate.

Eb
#28 Jun 17 2004 at 1:52 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Well, maybe in the media.

Last I checked, majority still wins in voting (sort of )


I smell conspiracy.
#29 Jun 17 2004 at 2:01 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Quote:
@#%^ing baby killers


I like this sock puppet.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#30 Jun 17 2004 at 2:05 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Holy Moses! You think he's a sockpuppet??

Hey, maybe you're right!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#31 Jun 17 2004 at 2:27 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,311 posts
I think once Sneasel stated his opinion that liberals are anti american and murderers to boot, it pretty much eliminated any need to defend the liberal stance on anything.
#32 Jun 17 2004 at 4:54 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Micheal Moore Blows


And you suck.

and yet the world keeps turning....

Eb

#33 Jun 18 2004 at 12:03 AM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
Quote:
Proof!?! LMFAO!! Have you read his books? Every book, everything he says, is either bashing Bush, Republicans, or supporting Liberals. And so is his movie. Please, go read his books and prove me otherwise.
That'd put him in the same camp then as Rush or O'Riely or Al Franklin or any other person who's made a profession out of political commentary. None of the people I mentioned are actually politicans working for their respective parties.

Bush using 9/11 footage in election campaign = tacky
Kerry using 9/11 footage in election campaign = tacky
Rush using 9/11 to discredit Kerry = Fine
Moore using 9/11 to discredit Bush = Fine

Get it? Granted, I might say Rush is an idiot given what he has to say, but I don't blame the Administration for Rush being an idiot.


there is 1 major differance there.... political comentators, tell you up front they are working for a political angle.
#34 Jun 18 2004 at 1:01 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,499 posts
Liberal is NOT a dirty word.

Liberal = 1a. Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry. b. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded.

Conservative = Favoring traditional views and values; tending to oppose change.

I am a liberal and proud of it. Do you really know what it means to be a liberal? Look in a freaking dictionary sometime - it means that you are not opposed to change.

Bush is trying to turn this country into a fascist state. (if you don't know what that means, again, look in a dictionary). Bush and his followers are trying to tear down the Constitution of the US slowly but surely, except for the second amendment of course. He has absolutely no respect for the document for which this country's laws are based on.

kundalini
#35 Jun 18 2004 at 1:12 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
political comentators, tell you up front they are working for a political angle.
Sure. That's why O'Reilly claims to be independant. Smiley: rolleyes
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#36 Jun 18 2004 at 2:22 AM Rating: Decent
*
104 posts
Quote:
Strictly following religious guidelines, both abortion AND capital punsihment are wrong and immoral


Yeah... that's why throughout the jewish and christian history there's *ABSOLUTLY NO* recollections where the church approved of capital punishment. Oh, wait... that's not right; it IS everywhere in religious history.

And sorry I'm an uneducated ***, but I don't know enough about other religions' holy books to comment.
#37 Jun 18 2004 at 2:58 AM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
plainolewhiteguy wrote:
Yeah... that's why throughout the jewish and christian history there's *ABSOLUTLY NO* recollections where the church approved of capital punishment. Oh, wait... that's not right; it IS everywhere in religious history.


Well as far as the Catholic Church goes:
http://www.louisville.edu/~kereh001/capitalpunishment.htm
Quote:
"A sign of hope is the increasing recognition that the dignity of human life must never be taken away, even in the case of someone who has done great evil. Modern society has the means of protecting itself, without definitively denying criminals the chance to reform. I renew the appeal for a consensus to end the death penalty, which is both cruel and unnecessary." Pope John Paul II, January 27, 1999




And for Judaism:
http://www.msnusers.com/judaismfaqs/resolutionsonthedeathpenalty.msnw
Quote:
.....There is another reason which argues for the abolition of capital punishment. It is the fact of human fallibility. Too often we learn of people who were convicted of crimes and only later are new facts uncovered by which their innocence is established. The doors of the jail can be opened, in such cases we can partially undo the injustice. But the dead cannot be brought back to life again. We regard all forms of capital punishment as barbaric and obsolete..."

["Proceedings of the Committee on Jewish Law and Standards 1927-1970" Volume III, p.1537-1538]



Quote:
A more recent resolution of the Rabbinical Assembly (1996) states:...

...Therefore be it resolved that the Rabbinical Assembly oppose the adoption of death penalty laws, and urge their abolition in states that already adopted them;



#38 Jun 18 2004 at 6:12 AM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Quote:

there is 1 major differance there.... political comentators, tell you up front they are working for a political angle.


No they don't. If they did, Fox News would have a statement rolling in their "ticker" 24/7 saying so.

Have you even seen the movie?

Then you're a moron for criticizing something in complete ignorance. Then again, that's pretty much the defining charactersistic of conservatives as a whole so I guess you're doing well by those standards.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#39 Jun 18 2004 at 12:44 PM Rating: Decent
Smasharoo wrote:
Quote:

there is 1 major differance there.... political comentators, tell you up front they are working for a political angle.


No they don't. If they did, Fox News would have a statement rolling in their "ticker" 24/7 saying so.

Have you even seen the movie?

Then you're a moron for criticizing something in complete ignorance. Then again, that's pretty much the defining charactersistic of conservatives as a whole so I guess you're doing well by those standards.


hmm moron am i? please tell me how you interpit my post as a criticizing anything. i just made a point. the person was refering to all sharpton, and rush limbaugh(sp? on both) and i made my simple comment.

hmm lets see here. Rush will and always has admited to being a political analist commentating on the Far right side of things. mainly lHIS right side of things. so has al sharpton from what little i can remember of his stuff. dont list to him often but the few times i have, that is the impression i get.

neither of them are hiding behind 'celeberty status' and claiming to be something they are not. so now... who is the moron? you seem to love to incite things, but this time you have not 1 leg to stand on for your assumption, and guess what assumptions make you look like the *** you are being.
#40 Jun 18 2004 at 12:54 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
was refering to all sharpton, and rush limbaugh(sp? on both)
Well, for one thing, "Sharpton" is supposed to be spelled F-r-a-n-k-l-i-n if you wanted to be correct Smiley: lol

As for the rest of it, I don't recall Moore trying to hide his leanings. If you don't know Moore is an unabashed liberal it's only because you haven't taken the .005 seconds to look into it that it'd take to find out. He's a filmmaker who makes films (whether you want to call them documenteries or not) exposing the follies of the Right. That's what he does. Anyone who'd pay eight bucks to see a Moore film already knows what he does. It's not like we're talking about a Jerry Bruckheimer summer blockbuster about a President who fails to listen to intelligence and allows every major building in the US to explode in slow motion fireballs.

Quote:
neither of them are hiding behind 'celeberty status' and claiming to be something they are not
That's great, except my last example was of Bill o'Reilly and his laughable claims to be an independant when he's just a Rush Limbaugh clone.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#41 Jun 18 2004 at 1:01 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Quote:

hmm moron am i? please tell me how you interpit my post as a criticizing anything. i just made a point. the person was refering to all sharpton, and rush limbaugh(sp? on both) and i made my simple comment.


Simple indeed.

Quote:

hmm lets see here. Rush will and always has admited to being a political analist commentating on the Far right side of things. mainly lHIS right side of things. so has al sharpton from what little i can remember of his stuff. dont list to him often but the few times i have, that is the impression i get.


Find me a quote of Limbaugh claiming he's biased.



Quote:

neither of them are hiding behind 'celeberty status' and claiming to be something they are not. so now... who is the moron? you seem to love to incite things, but this time you have not 1 leg to stand on for your assumption, and guess what assumptions make you look like the *** you are being.


Assumptions do make you look like an ***, I agree compeltely.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#42 Jun 18 2004 at 1:37 PM Rating: Excellent
*
116 posts
Quote:
Well, for one thing, "Sharpton" is supposed to be spelled F-r-a-n-k-l-i-n if you wanted to be correct


Not to be too much of a pain in the ***, but isn't it Al Franken? F-R-A-N-K-E-N. I have to laugh when the left don't even know the names of players on their Team.

He's a supposed comedian turned political HACK.

Thought I'd help you out Jophiel.
#43 Jun 18 2004 at 1:43 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I think you're right. Of course, Singdall wasn't too sure on Limbaugh either and apparently has no clue on O'Reilly, so don't be too smug Smiley: wink

Quote:
He's a supposed comedian turned political HACK
But he uses big words! And used to host Monday Night Football!

Oh, wait...
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#44 Jun 18 2004 at 4:43 PM Rating: Default
Jophiel wrote:
[quote]
Bush using 9/11 footage in election campaign = tacky
Kerry using 9/11 footage in election campaign = tacky
Rush using 9/11 to discredit Kerry = Fine
Moore using 9/11 to discredit Bush = Fine


Agreed. To those who haven't read or seen Michael Moore's stuff, don't bother to comment. As far as our President is concerned, he is by far the worst and most dangerous president we have ever had in office. He might as well be wearing a swastika on his chest. His narrow-minded, one track way of attaining something (with or without the U.N. originally - funny how all of a sudden he is clamoring for their collaboration in the election year), is not only endangering our lives, but destroying the International reputation past U.S. presidents have worked so hard to achieve. Through his self-proclaimed war on terror, which he intentionally justified by false claims - not only that Iraq had WMDs (false), but also that Iraq and Al Qaeda were working together (false) - as you can see in the news they are fiercely trying to spin the NON-PARTISAN commission's findings now...backpeddling and saying there were loose connections now that the truth is out. How convenient for them that people forget over time. Funny how they released a statement several months ago stating that terror rates had dropped by a significant amount in 2003 "to the lowest level in over 30 years" only to concede recently that the statistics only included part of 2003, and in actuality the rates of terrorism increased drastically in 2003, to the highest level in 20 years.

15 of the 19 suspected highjackers involved in 9-11 (again, nothing to do with Iraq), were from Saudi Arabia. Anyone remember reading in the news that Saudi Arabia attacked the United States? Had 15 of the 19 highjackers been North Korean would we have heard "North Korea attacks the USA?" You bet. Why didn't we hear it? President Bush's family has close ties to Saudi Arabia's royal family, our country's largest oil supplier. Members of this royal family have been quoted as saying that they consider President H.W. Bush and his wife (and now W. Bush) to be like their own parents, and they feel they can ask them for help with just about anything. Hmmm. Funny how the president authorized (amidst the flight lockdown in the days post 9-11), jets to fly around the country to pick up members of the Saudi Royal family AND OSAMA BIN LADENS FAMILY and fly them out of the country without anything more than a passport check, "for their own safety". President Bush knows that pissing off the royal family would seriously endanger our economy, regardless of their involvement in 9-11.

This in addition to how he lied to our senate about how much the medicare bill would cost - originally stating a price of 400 billion, which narrowly passed the bill, only to come out a month later and say "Our estimates put the cost of the bill around 530 billion," fueling a great deal of anger from our representatives.

Many believe that George W. Bush wouldn't have even "won" the 2000 election had Texas not sent a list of names of people SIMILAR to names of ex-cons, a large portion of which, big surprise, were latinos who would have voted for Gore. Reason? These people could possibly be ex-cons. These people were shocked to find that on election day they couldn't vote in the most important and close-call Florida counties, just because they had a certain name. Texas was the only state do this.

George W. Bush's arrogance endangers the world right now. A quote in Time magazine recently said something similar to "The problem with George Bush is that he can't tell the difference between reality, and his reality" As one who should be a leader and example to the world, he is very embarrassing to me. On the night he was elected in 2000, I told a friend of mine that now he is in office, we will be going to war. I didn't know with whom, I didn't know why, but I knew we were going to war. Why? Because of his character, attitude, and personality. A self-proclaimed freedom fighter, who has now "liberated" Iraq, and in its place left a destroyed infrastructure, uncountable amounts of depleted uranium which has given cancer to thousands of children, and a country in the midst of a civil war. With the pressure mounting to draw out of the country (as the public is now largely against the war), we will be out by the election - leaving behind some troops to maintain a shadow of order -...just in time to re-elect him and move on to the next war (probably Iran or North Korea). Liberals, and Michael Moore are not unpatriotic (although that is how the right loves to spin it) - they are the very patriotic, fostering justified skepticism of a dangerous regime. I hope for the best, but fear the worst.
#45 Jun 18 2004 at 4:45 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Quote:
He might as well be wearing a swastika on his chest.

Godwins!
#46 Jun 18 2004 at 4:58 PM Rating: Default
Roo I've heard the fat ******* tell his radio listeners that he was partial to the leftness or rightness of the current president, but I think he tried justifying himself saying that if we had a democratics pres.. he would do the same thing, for the sake of supporting his leader in times like these... something to that efffect. I don't know if that fits in or not.

And to YOU sock puppet spiral, you make me feel all warm inside... like michael moore graced our forum.
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 207 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (207)