Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Micheal Moore BlowsFollow

#1 Jun 17 2004 at 12:25 PM Rating: Good
Funny when Liberals were bashing on Bush because he showed a 2 second clip of the towers in one of his commercials, they were saying he was using 9/11 for political reasons. Farenheit 9/11, may I speak anymore? Thats a whole ******* movie just for politics. And please, don't tell me otherwise, we all know Micheal Moore is one of the biggest Liberals out there, and everything he does is for politics. Liberals, stop playing dirty.
#2 Jun 17 2004 at 12:28 PM Rating: Good
****
6,858 posts
One of the nice things about free speech is that you can express your opinion. People saying Bush exploited 9-11 were expressing their opinion. The movie is the same thing. I guess, in some twisted way, what you just said is an opinion.
#3 Jun 17 2004 at 12:29 PM Rating: Decent
Excellent point but try explaining that to the Liberals. Bring back Bismarck.

Christus der gute Hirt-bewachet seine Herden

O herr! Zukomme uns Dein Reich und gescheh Dein Wille
Wie in dem Himmel, also auch auf Erden
#4 Jun 17 2004 at 12:30 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
People saying Bush planned 9-11 were expressing their opinion.


FTFY

hehehehe I see why you like this so much Crimson.
#5 Jun 17 2004 at 12:31 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,858 posts
Smiley: confused Crack pipe+lips=bad
#6 Jun 17 2004 at 12:31 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,858 posts
Friar Reinman wrote:
Quote:
People saying Bush planned 9-11 were expressing their opinion.


FTFY

hehehehe I see why you like this so much Crimson.


Smiley: lol
#7 Jun 17 2004 at 12:31 PM Rating: Decent
Kim Jong Il
#8 Jun 17 2004 at 12:35 PM Rating: Good
I don't know you, I have not read any of Moores books or seen his movies, yet I must agree.

I hate Moore.

Yes, I can be a close minded fu[b][/b]ck sometimes. For an "American", he sure does seem to hate America a lot. I also hate that "Supersize me" guy. They can both die for all I care.
#9 Jun 17 2004 at 12:37 PM Rating: Good
Frankly it seems all Liberals are against America. They are always trying to find **** about America then playing it 24/7 on the News. Hopefully, people will start to realize this. Seems like Liberals just want to trash America in hopes they will hit Bush. When the fact is they are just ruining our morale and reputation.

They are also murderers. Explain to me how killing something that is alive, even though it is inside of a woman, is different then killing a normal baby? If you smash a cacoon, is that not killing the catipillar? ******* baby killers.

Edited, Thu Jun 17 13:39:35 2004 by Sneasel
#10 Jun 17 2004 at 12:38 PM Rating: Good
What about the guy that lost all of the weight on the Subway diet, and now does those commercials, I hate him the most.

Edited, Thu Jun 17 13:39:44 2004 by Reinman
#11 Jun 17 2004 at 12:40 PM Rating: Decent
Yea, Jared, he's a *****. I swear, if you look at his before and after pictures it's definently not the same guy. They just got a new skinny guy and took a picture of a fat guy and said, "hey look, I lost 500 pounds, come eat at Subway!"
#12 Jun 17 2004 at 12:43 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Sneasel wrote:
Frankly it seems all Liberals are against America. They are always trying to find **** about America then playing it 24/7 on the News.

When will people realize that DISSENT IS GOOD FOR AMERICA.
VIGILANT SKEPTICISM OF GOVERNMENT IS GOOD FOR AMERICA.


Sneasel wrote:
They are also murderers. Explain to me how killing something that is alive, even though it is inside of a woman, is different then killing a normal baby? If you smash a cacoon, is that not killing the catipillar? ******* baby killers.

Well you're getting pretty far off-topic now, but a Liberal could argue that Conservatives are muderers for supporting capital punishment. Both sides are hypocritical in that regard, I'll admit that.
#13 Jun 17 2004 at 12:46 PM Rating: Decent
So, how is killing CRIMINALS the same as killing innocent children? There have been reports of innocent people being murdered on capitol punishment, but that doesn't even scratch the surface of how many abortions people have had. If your too poor or lazy to use a condom, don't have sex.
#14 Jun 17 2004 at 12:49 PM Rating: Decent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
Micheal Moore is one of the biggest Liberals out there, and everything he does is for politics. Liberals, stop playing dirty.
Moore is not a politican. He is a film-maker with an agenda. Most of that agenda involves making money for Mr. Moore, I'd asuume. Unless you have some proof he's in the Democratic Party's employ, what's your point?

Just so we're straight, is it right or wrong to capitalize upon 9/11 for political gain?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#15 Jun 17 2004 at 12:50 PM Rating: Decent
Proof!?! LMFAO!! Have you read his books? Every book, everything he says, is either bashing Bush, Republicans, or supporting Liberals. And so is his movie. Please, go read his books and prove me otherwise.

And I really don't care about using 9/11 for political gain. My problem is just that Liberals ***** about Bush showing a 2 second clip of the towers, when they are over here making a whole ******* movie about it.

Edited, Thu Jun 17 13:51:43 2004 by Sneasel
#16 Jun 17 2004 at 12:51 PM Rating: Decent
Michael Moore is another person that has a name, that utilizes that name to push his own political agenda. It's a bunch of BS. Any person that has "celebrity" status can easily forcefeed their views to mainstream America. Why? Because a lot of people are dumb enough to listen. It really sucks that a minority viewpoint can be hundreds of times stronger than the majority view. This is not democracy!
#17 Jun 17 2004 at 12:51 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Sneasel wrote:
So, how is killing CRIMINALS the same as killing innocent children? There have been reports of innocent people being murdered on capitol punishment, but that doesn't even scratch the surface of how many abortions people have had. If your too poor or lazy to use a condom, don't have sex.

There are those who argue that no one has the right to end ANY human life. In fact, most of those people are religious-types, a decidedly conservative faction. But this is an argument for a different thread.
#18 Jun 17 2004 at 12:53 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
FigNewton wrote:
It really sucks that a minority viewpoint can be hundreds of times stronger than the majority view. This is not democracy!

Freedom of speech to make movies about whatever you want is not democracy?

The minority HAS to be loud, otherwise it won't be heard.

And Moore is not necessarily in the minority. From a stricly Democrat vs. Republican standpoint, the last election was almost exactly 50-50.
#19 Jun 17 2004 at 12:54 PM Rating: Decent
"When John Kerry ressurected my corpse in Dragon Necropolis, he risked his life to save mine" "Im John Kerry and I approve this message"
#20 Jun 17 2004 at 12:54 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,858 posts
Michael Moore just makes movies that are like long news investigations. As they say, the media is the 4th branch of government. There are both Conservative and Liberal stations out there, just as well as conservative and liberal film-makers.

On the liberal side you have Michael Moore.

On the conservative you have Schwarzenegger.
#21 Jun 17 2004 at 12:56 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
Proof!?! LMFAO!! Have you read his books? Every book, everything he says, is either bashing Bush, Republicans, or supporting Liberals. And so is his movie. Please, go read his books and prove me otherwise.
That'd put him in the same camp then as Rush or O'Riely or Al Franklin or any other person who's made a profession out of political commentary. None of the people I mentioned are actually politicans working for their respective parties.

Bush using 9/11 footage in election campaign = tacky
Kerry using 9/11 footage in election campaign = tacky
Rush using 9/11 to discredit Kerry = Fine
Moore using 9/11 to discredit Bush = Fine

Get it? Granted, I might say Rush is an idiot given what he has to say, but I don't blame the Administration for Rush being an idiot.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#22 Jun 17 2004 at 12:58 PM Rating: Good
Look, until the baby grows up and does something bad, it's NOT OK TO KILL IT.

Now after he grows up and does something bad, then you can teach him not to do that by using lethal injection.

Actually, I don't really have much of an opinion on abortion. Despite rumors to the contrary at the office, I am not now, nor have I ever been, pregnant. That's just where I store my beer.

I'm in favor of capital punishment. Yeah, some innocent people will die. I'm pretty sure that happens every day anyway. I'm an insensitive prick and I'm happy if we can get at least 80% guilty people. We just need to open more registers so there's less waiting.

Michael Moore is a ****. Politicians in general are ********** They spend so much time smokescreening 'issues' that they keep our attention off the fact that we really don't need their asses. For a fraction of the cost, we could actually be a real democracy and let everyone have a say in things.



Edited, Thu Jun 17 13:59:48 2004 by TStephens
#23 Jun 17 2004 at 12:58 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

Jophiel nailed it.
#24 Jun 17 2004 at 1:01 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
TStephens wrote:
Look, until the baby grows up and does something bad, it's NOT OK TO KILL IT.

Now after he grows up and does something bad, then you can teach him not to do that by using lethal injection.

Like I said, that's your opinion, and opinions vary.

Strictly following religious guidelines, both abortion AND capital punsihment are wrong and immoral.
#25 Jun 17 2004 at 1:13 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
It really sucks that a minority viewpoint can be hundreds of times stronger than the majority view. This is not democracy!



Freedom of speech to make movies about whatever you want is not democracy?


NO NO. My point is that minority counts more than majority. Kind of like the Google shares that the co-founders and CEO will hold.

Edited, Thu Jun 17 14:15:04 2004 by FigNewton
#26 Jun 17 2004 at 1:18 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
FigNewton wrote:
NO NO. My point is that minority counts more than majority. Kind of like the Google shares that the co-founders and CEO will hold.


Well, maybe in the media.

Last I checked, majority still wins in voting (sort of Smiley: wink2)
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 249 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (249)