Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Anybody else into boxing?Follow

#1 Apr 26 2004 at 7:39 PM Rating: Good
I've been watching boxing since the early 90's, but I just realised that I'm into it.

Anyone else into boxing?

What classes? Doesn't matter?

I like middle weights, but I'll watch anyone.

What happened to Prince Nasseem Hamed? Please, someone tell me he got what was coming to him?

-Gie

Edit: Also, who are your favorite fighters?

Edited, Mon Apr 26 20:42:38 2004 by Gie
#2 Apr 26 2004 at 7:46 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
What happened to Prince Nasseem Hamed?


He started fighting mexicans. 1,2,3,4,5...

And yes I like boxing, but not a lot to cheer about lately, the sport needs a good overhauling in my mind.

I like the middleweights and higher. I don't like the small guys, it gets boring watching two 100lb men that can't even compress the air out of the gloves.

I have a friend that knows everything about boxing, haven't seen him for quite a while though.

Edited, Mon Apr 26 20:52:32 2004 by Reinman
#3 Apr 26 2004 at 7:49 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,453 posts
I enjoy boxing, but I generally prefer its history to the current crop of fighters. I'm too much of a catch-as-catch-can fan to keep up with what's really going on in the sport now. But catch me in five or ten years and I can tell you all about how it was today.

#4 Apr 26 2004 at 7:51 PM Rating: Good
the sport needs a good overhauling in my mind.

As in, the corruption factor, or overhauling the available athletes at the moment?

I have seen some of the worst calls in any sport, in boxing.

I'd have to agree if you meant either.

-Gie
#5 Apr 26 2004 at 7:52 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
I'd like to see the Klitchko's fight each other.

There's really not a lot of compelling boxers around at the moment. Roy Jones, I guess, but he's reaching sideshow status in thinking he can move up in class. There's no good divisions with two great fighters and a rivalry. I'd say De Lahoya/Trinidad is intresting, but it isn't to me. They both seem to not care enough.

Ward/Gotti was the best fight I've seen in a long time and it was two guys who were basically washed up to begin with. I'm disapointed Lewis retired, he was at least a good interview in that I could understand him when he spoke and didn't thank God for everything.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#6 Apr 26 2004 at 7:55 PM Rating: Good
I generally prefer its history to the current crop of fighters.

My mom grew up in New York City, and used to tell me about the fights she and my grandfather would go to. Bare fisted brawls, and until someone dropped even!

That is something.

-Gie
#7 Apr 26 2004 at 8:01 PM Rating: Good
Gotti/Ward was amazing, smash. Delahoya used to have it. It's gone now.

Roy Jones, haha, you hit the nail on the head with "he's reaching sideshow status".

He is a great fighter, but I, along with a lot of people can't stand antics in boxing.

If Lamon beat the one Klitchko, Vitali would wipe the floor with his own brother.

Sanders fight was decent. I so wanted that roughneck to win.

-Gie

Edited, Mon Apr 26 21:02:31 2004 by Gie
#8 Apr 26 2004 at 8:07 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Jones' biggest problem is lack of competition. At his prime he may have been the best ever pound for pound, but we'l never know because there wasn't anyone for him to fight. He had amazing handspeed for a guy his size though.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#9 Apr 26 2004 at 8:38 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Watching flyweights is a bunch of fun. They go at each other like buzzsaws, hit like schoolgirls, and prance and preen just like the big boys.

If you like watching blood spray, get into kickboxing. I saw my first fight in Camp Zama, Japan, and was stunned at how brutal it is. If you think a glove to the temple resulting in a knockout is nifty, wait till you see a roundhouse kick flush to the jaw combined with a knee to the nose. Yowsah!

0.o

Totem
#10 Apr 26 2004 at 8:52 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
He had amazing handspeed for a guy his size though


Why for a guy his size? He had great handspeed period. He had great power as well, and he is probably one of the most elusive fighters I have ever seen fight. He would make really good boxers look like amateurs, missing him by like 3 feet, stuff like that.
#11 Apr 26 2004 at 8:59 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Quote:

Why for a guy his size?

Because probably every flyweight in history has been faster. It's just the way it is, lighter guys, faster hands, throw more punches.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#12 Apr 26 2004 at 9:13 PM Rating: Good
Just never heard it said like that before, generally it is assumed. Otherwise, you would have to say it after every statement. He's a good fighter, for a guy his size. He has good power, for a guy his size. He has good handspeed, for a guy his size. Thinks he can win it all, in his weight class. He can knock people out. They reserve the last one for the little guys, because not all of them can. Just checking to see if things were changing out there, and nobody told me.
#13 Apr 26 2004 at 10:32 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
What happened to Prince Nasseem Hamed? Please, someone tell me he got what was coming to him?
Naseem is about 12 stone now does a lot of off screen charity work, don't let the 'Fight persona' fool you he is a nice guy but he had to sell tickets and he did by the bucket load.

The best British fighters out there at the moment are Calzage, he would be able to give jones a run for his money and Ricky Hatton, i don't know if you have seem him in action but he's going to take some stopping. He is the only fighter i have ever seem that you can tell 10 punches before he drops them that they are going.

The heavyweight division is a joke right now and pretty boring to watch, Lewis was good and would have beaten all the 'Great' if onlt because he was so much bigger and fitter than that era's

I know it's hard to take but as good as Ali was if Lewis hit him he would have dropped lke a stone.
#14 Apr 26 2004 at 10:34 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Quote:

I know it's hard to take but as good as Ali was if Lewis hit him he would have dropped lke a stone.

Put the crack pipe down, son. Ali would have destroyed Lewis.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#15 Apr 26 2004 at 10:40 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
In your and his dreams maybe.

Look Lewis maybe 10% of Ali's pure talent, but the guy is huge back in the Good ol days of heavyweight boxing <and they where> the only guy's arounf that big looked like the had been training on Twinkies.

That fact is like all sports the bar has been raised and the great of yesteryear wouldn't cut it in todays manifestation.

No disrespect to Ali he is still the greatest ever by any reconning.

Oh and Ding 100o go me.

i hearby award me a cookie Smiley: cookie
#16 Apr 26 2004 at 10:44 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Lewis didn't have the handsped to even get to Ali. Foreman in his prime was a far harder puncher than Lewis. Lewis benefitted from a run down Heavyweight division. He was champ because he was in the right place at the right time. He would have been about the 5th best heavyweight in the sixties, if that.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#17 Apr 27 2004 at 3:42 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
Quote:
I know it's hard to take but as good as Ali was if Lewis hit him he would have dropped lke a stone.


BWAHAHA. As Smash said, Foreman was a far bigger hitter than Lewis. Ali took a punch better than anyone in history. Ali would have ripped Lewis a new one. Particularly prior to Ali's exile years.

Lewis dominated because he was in an era with no major challengers, Holyfield was his main nemesis who was effectively a pumped up Cruiserweight. I mean really.
#18 Apr 27 2004 at 9:44 AM Rating: Decent
Yeah Lewis was a "great" heavyweight. With those impressive wins against Bowe, and 127 year old Holyfield, and a manic depressive Tyson. And I'm sure Ali would be upset by Hasim Rahman and Oliver McCall in his prime, too! Lewis is a joke, in a joke of an era. He almost lost to Vitali and nobody thinks he's a great heavy.

Lewis retired b/c he didn't want to get embarassed by a much better Roy Jones Jr.

edit* and for the record Hatton will be exposed if he ever fights a contender.

Edited, Tue Apr 27 10:46:39 2004 by DashertheChef
#19 Apr 27 2004 at 10:19 AM Rating: Decent
hiya!
#20 Apr 27 2004 at 10:34 AM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
edit* and for the record Hatton will be exposed if he ever fights a contender.
Here speak some without a f*cking clue about boxing.

Hatton has beat the second tear of the world easier and faster than any of the top 3.

Funny how the top three suddenly want 50% more than thier usual fee just to step into the ring with him.They do this why? becuse they know that he could <Not will, could> beat them.

Besides i never said he was the best in the world, i said he was 1 of the 2 best britain had to offer and he would take some stopping.

I still think that Lewis in his prime Vs Ali in his prime would be too much for Ali because the skills of the modern boxer have improved and Lewis's sheer size compaired with boxers of Ali's era.

Quote:
And I'm sure Ali would be upset by Hasim Rahman and Oliver McCall in his prime, too! Lewis is a joke, in a joke of an era.
So Ali wasn't beaten then? i'm sure he was, and Lewis beat both in the rematches within 4 rounds.

I agree the modern heavyweight division is poor which is why it's hard for you to see just how much quality Lewis has. Remember he like Ali won the gold medal, and that take talent.

#21 Apr 27 2004 at 10:39 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Quote:

So Ali wasn't beaten then?

Sure he was.

By vastly superior boxers to Lewis.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#22 Apr 27 2004 at 11:17 AM Rating: Good
Sage
*
75 posts
There's been some great light-mid weight fights the last couple of years. Ward-Gatti, Freitas-Barrios. Cory Spinks had a decent one a couple of weeks ago. Tapia was entertaining until recently. Freitas looked unbeatable until his last fight or two, he had a high-profile divorce in that time, maybe he'll recover.

That Klitschko fight Saturday against Sanders was fun to watch. Always great to see a flabby guy like Sanders take beating and keep coming. Too bad Vitali couldn't finish Lennox, he looks too stiff to me to unify the belts. I think Byrd would land a thousand of his limp wristed taps on Vitali and win on points every time.

Edited, Tue Apr 27 12:18:17 2004 by Aades
#23 Apr 27 2004 at 11:45 AM Rating: Decent
Ali won the title in 1964 beating Sonny Liston. His first loss was to Joe Frazier in 71. Lost again to Ken Norton in 73. Lost again to Leon Spinx in 78. Then beat by Larry Holmes in 1980 when he was 38. That and a final loss to Trevor Berbick a month before his 40th birth were his only two losses where he didn't win the rematch. So lossing to 4 all time greats and one guy when he was way past his prime. Throw in the win vs. Forman in his prime and considered Forman was a title holder at 40+ in this same era as Lewis in his prime and there is no contest to whom is the better fighter.

Also Lewis ducked Chris Byrd, Roy Jones, and a re-match with Vitali. Wonder why?

And continue to brag about Hatton beating 2nd rank fighters. Not sure why you think they are 2nd rank and not the Tomato cans that they were i'm not sure. We'll see when he fights a top 10 guy.

#24 Apr 27 2004 at 12:22 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
Quote:
So Ali wasn't beaten then?


Not during his prime he wasn't, no. Ali was a far superior boxer prior to his 3 year break. This was a guy who called what round he would knock his opponent out, and get it right 90% of the time. He defended the title he won from Liston 10 times without defeat prior to his ban, compared with Lewis defending the one he got on a technicality 3 times before getting beat.

All the classics you have probably seen like Fraizer I,II,II and Foreman were all a much slower Ali, he made up for his loss of movement with sheer guts and tactics.

For 3 of his 5 losses, he was old , fat and already showing signs of Parkinsons when he lost to Spinks, Holmes and Berbick - those 3 losses came 18 years to 21 years after he started his professional career, through the most brutal and talented heavyweight line-up in history. Lewis by contrast had a career that lasted 14 years, and was a hell of a lot easier.

The other two losses agains Frazier and Norton were against quality, and fierce, boxers.

There is no comparison between Ali and Lewis.
#25 Apr 27 2004 at 12:29 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
And continue to brag about Hatton beating 2nd rank fighters. Not sure why you think they are 2nd rank and not the Tomato cans that they were i'm not sure. We'll see when he fights a top 10 guy.
He's WBo ranked no1 contender, WBC No3 and Wba No5, and Both Ben Tackie and Vince Phillips were top 10 ranked fighters In boxing News at the time he fought and beat them convincingly.

Ben Tackie said after his loss the Hatton, that Hatton is the best he has ever fought.
Quote:
Also Lewis ducked Chris Byrd, Roy Jones, and a re-match with Vitali. Wonder why?
Byrd made all the right noises but never atually made any attempt to make a match, Jones is not a heavyweight, and he beat Vitali in the first fight and retired because unlike alot of boxers he knew when to quit.

Lewis is a VERY smart man he knew it was time to go, maybe because at 37 he was getting to old for the game and why take the beatings like Foreman and Tyson if you don't have too.

To say Lewis Ducked fights is rubbish quite frankly he fought every single one of the No1 rated contenders including a very unstable Tyson that he didn't have to fight.

#26 Apr 27 2004 at 12:37 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
For 3 of his 5 losses, he was old , fat and already showing signs of Parkinsons when he lost to Spinks, Holmes and Berbick - those 3 losses came 18 years to 21 years after he started his professional career, through the most brutal and talented heavyweight line-up in history. Lewis by contrast had a career that lasted 14 years, and was a hell of a lot easier.

The other two losses agains Frazier and Norton were against quality, and fierce, boxers.
Do you see me arguing that Ali wasn't the greatest no, i am saying that boxing like all sports evolve and become better, the fighters of today are better than those of 20 years ago fitter, faster and hit harder it is the natural progression of any sport. In 20 years the world No 1 will probably be 6'10 and 20 stone of pure muscle that if Lewis had to fight they would pound him into the dirt.

In much the same way Athlete's are faster, jump higher and are bigger in size to those 20 years ago.

I am NOT repeat NOT saying that Ali isn't the greatest fighter the world has ever seen i am saying if he was stuck in a time machine and fought today he would find that boxing is a different game now, as with all sports.

I have been trying to find stats on Ali's and Foremans hieght / weight but i can't for the life of me.
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 297 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (297)