Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Sexuality and ChildrenFollow

#152 Apr 27 2004 at 12:24 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Quote:

The decison to teach kids about sex its down to the individual and the circumstances in which the child is in. There is no specific age when it is okay.

Take a ******* position you coward.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#153 Apr 27 2004 at 12:27 PM Rating: Default
***
1,213 posts
Their are no ******* sides to take. Dumbass.
Their are more than two points of view, ****.
#154 Apr 27 2004 at 12:37 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,311 posts
I'm so tired of sock puppets.

And Yossarian, I knew that about the guy who played Robin running the great dane shelter. My first dog was a great dane. They are awesome dogs. Maybe you should drop by now and then to see if you can catch Batman visiting.

Edited, Tue Apr 27 13:44:17 2004 by Yanari
#155 Apr 27 2004 at 12:40 PM Rating: Default
***
1,213 posts
Yea me too. Don't they just annoy you. Anyway back to the ***********
#156 Apr 27 2004 at 12:52 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Their are no @#%^ing sides to take. Dumbass.
Their are more than two points of view, @#%^.

Maybe the geometry they teach on your side of the pond is non-euclidean, but in the U.S., we learn about shapes that have more than one dimension thus have more than 2 sides.
#157 Apr 27 2004 at 1:00 PM Rating: Default
***
1,213 posts
Quote:
more than two points

Quoting myself here.

Empahsise MORE THAN two not LESS, MORE. You got that. U.S Geometry top notch. U.S Basic mathematics **** poor.
#158 Apr 27 2004 at 1:05 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Their are no @#%^ing sides to take. Dumbass.
Their are more than two points of view, @#%^.

Quote:
Empahsise MORE THAN two not LESS, MORE. You got that. U.S Geometry top notch. U.S Basic mathematics **** poor.

Quoting yourself there, emphasis on "[There] are no f'ucking sides to take." Multiple sided objects allow for more than two points to occupy their own f'ucking side. Dumbass.

British basic mathematics spot on. Newbie is a comfortable chair's basic logic skills **** poor.
#159 Apr 27 2004 at 1:13 PM Rating: Decent
*****
16,160 posts
Ignore him. He's prolly an Irishman with a Limey fetish. All hoity-toity when holding his whiskey glass with his pinky sticking out.

Totem
#160 Apr 27 2004 at 1:20 PM Rating: Default
***
1,213 posts
Don't forget the adventures with the leprachauns. So close to that pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. By the way, how was St Patricks Day in good ol' USA
#161 Apr 27 2004 at 1:46 PM Rating: Decent
*****
16,160 posts
You mean like this?

TheDave O'Gill and the Little People

Totem
#162 Apr 27 2004 at 6:28 PM Rating: Good
***
2,453 posts
Quote:
Just pulling this back to the top, to put pressure on Deathwysh for some more of those limericks. You are the king of limericks my friend. I am surprised I haven't seen anything based on the classic "There once was a man from Nantuckit(sp



I don't think anyone here is from Nantucket, but if someone pops up, I'll do my best.


I'm pretty much drained for now. I have to sort of get to know people a little to have some idea of what to put in their limerick, and with the massive influx of new people its too soon for all of them. For the old timers I didn't get to, I just don't know enough about them, or just couldn't come up with something that rhymes.

However, this is one of my favorites (but not one of mine - though I'd dearly love to take credit for it).


Poor nymphomaniacal Alice
used a dynamite stick for a phallus
they found her ******
in North Carolina
and her a$$-hole in Buckingham Palace.


And one more, for one of the less popular board members, but I warn you, its pretty gross and distasteful so avoid it if you're the sensitive sort.


A true ****-junkie named Pum
got high each day on fresh ***
this ***-drunk young punk
with a mouth full of *****
said "I'm Pum, I like ***, yum, yum, yum".

Edited, Tue Apr 27 19:34:26 2004 by Deathwysh

Edited, Tue Apr 27 19:35:56 2004 by Deathwysh
#163 Apr 27 2004 at 6:47 PM Rating: Decent
*****
16,160 posts
RACK Deathwysh! Thread of the Year.

Totem
#164 Apr 28 2004 at 3:52 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Maybe the geometry they teach on your side of the pond is non-euclidean, but in the U.S., we learn about shapes that have more than one dimension thus have more than 2 sides


You know we wernt actually talking about shapes, was that meant to me philosophical and meaningful? Or did you get confused and think we were actaully talking about shapes?
#165 Apr 28 2004 at 8:03 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
You know we wernt actually talking about shapes, was that meant to me philosophical and meaningful? Or did you get confused and think we were actaully talking about shapes?

They teach speaking metaphorically in GB? Your friend said there are no sides, there are more than two points of view. I eloquently pointed out that more than two points of view are supported by the picking sides paradigm.

Pat, do they put Lithium in the water out there? Could that explain the influx?
#166 Apr 28 2004 at 8:08 AM Rating: Decent
Moeb, you missed what he was saying, he is saying that you cant take someones side, because there are different points of view, and if i took your side in an argument you could say something about our argmuent that i didnt agree with, thats his point, that you cant relate arguments to shapes like you did
#167 Apr 28 2004 at 8:19 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
Moeb, you missed what he was saying, he is saying that you cant take someones side, because there are different points of view, and if i took your side in an argument you could say something about our argmuent that i didnt agree with, thats his point, that you cant relate arguments to shapes like you did

I understood what he was saying. I am good like that. It was a falacious argument however, because on an issue, there are sides. Consider, if you will, the common sphere. When bisected you create 2 sides, akin to the moon with its perpetual light & dark. Now, even though rocks on the fringes of the seperation between light & dark have a better idea of what the light side must look like, they are no more "on the light side" than rocks positioned at the furthest point from the fringes. In a two sided argument, this analogy allows for disperate views of a common theme.

In a multi-sided argument, slight deviations along a theme would not be handled the same way. each point would occupy a different facet, therefore enjoying its own side.

Clear as mud yet?
#168 Apr 28 2004 at 8:28 AM Rating: Decent
This thread started off about sexuality and children, now look at it, there have been at least 5 different arguments, and every little rock is on a different side of the 5 moons, i thats what TheDave meant, even if he is as elequent as a duck, i think.
#169 Apr 28 2004 at 8:29 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,213 posts
Possibly a goat, but only on weekends.
#170 Apr 28 2004 at 8:30 AM Rating: Decent
Smiley: cookie
#171 Apr 28 2004 at 8:31 AM Rating: Decent
double post

Edited, Wed Apr 28 09:31:35 2004 by Dracoid
#172 Apr 28 2004 at 8:31 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,213 posts
Got Milk?
#173 Apr 28 2004 at 8:32 AM Rating: Excellent
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Quote:
In a multi-sided argument, slight deviations along a theme would not be handled the same way. each point would occupy a different facet, therefore enjoying its own side.

Unless an argument has so many sides, it ceases to be a polyhedron and becomes a sphere.
#174 Apr 28 2004 at 8:33 AM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
now look at it, there have been at least 5 different arguments, and every little rock is on a different side of the 5 moons

In a recent issue of Pop Sci, there were, iirc, 10 dimensions described, though not in detail. It's the new math, baby.

Besides, it wasn't my intention to keep his panties in a bunch. Just wedge them up a little. He can come back now.
#175 Apr 28 2004 at 8:35 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Unless an argument has so many sides, it ceases to be a polyhedron and becomes a sphere


yeah i think this became a sphere a while back
#176 Apr 28 2004 at 8:40 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,213 posts
Where else could you have a discussion about the properties of three dimensional shapes. Ahh the internet truly is the information highway.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 257 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (257)