Quote:
You mean civil uprising, worse than what is happening at the current moment, with all the troops already there?
Yes, that's exactly what I mean. See, think about it.
Small numbers to make it easier for you.
Let's say there are 100 troops there, 80 are from America, 20 from Australia, and there are many uprisings and riots, the troops are having trouble taking care of them all.
Take away the 20 Aussies, leaves us with 80 troops. Do you think the 80 troops can do a better job at keeping peace than the 100 troops did?
Making sense?
So, one could say that there would be consequences by taking out troops, right? The consequences being more struggle with uprisings. Not everything is a damn threat, you damn drunken, fighting aussies.
If Iraq was full of Beer instead of Oil, and crocs instead of Iraqis, I bet
then you'd be all about sending troops in.