Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Dumbest change from update..Follow

#1 Dec 15 2005 at 12:26 AM Rating: Decent
Ok, this isnt a rant, but im still a bit in shock.
As most of you have now noticed, while looking for a party, you check to see who else is looking, and now..you notice everyone from every lv who is also looking..... this sux.

And for me, this is why. I have turned to lving whm, which is at lv 10, therefore, im in hell, aka the dunes. I havent had 1 bit of party xp to this point, yet i have 4 parties. None that ive been lead for...but here is how everyone of them has went down.

1st pt- 3 members, lv range 10-12, lead invites a 19 blm
2nd pt- 2 members, lv range, both lv 10, lead invites a 16 drg (ew :P)
3rd pt- 5 members, lv range 10-12, lead invites a lv 20 war
And the worst one of them all so far....
4th pt- 4 members, lv range 10-13, the asshat leader invites....a lv 65 whm...O_O w...t....h...

I hope either they fix this, or i hope thier is a way to change it, and then post all over the place, that this can be changed...cuz this is bad....atleast..i think so.

I miss when only a few months ago, that like 75% of the people in the dunes were all rank 8+, now i guess its more like 10%...

Ah well, xbox...damn you! :P
#2 Dec 15 2005 at 5:22 AM Rating: Decent
**
617 posts
Yes I've heard a couple horror stories about this too and before I heard this example from a friend, this patch seemed inconvenient at its worst.

But yes, the true newbies in the Dunes are really going to do a number over on some parties there. It's not really their fault, but it's not pleasant.

Best case scenario, perhaps it'll teach them the importance of keeping the levels close. Worst case, the Dunes becomes an even more arduous 10 levels than it already is (and you thought it wasn't humanly possible! :p).

Hang in there everyone...
#3 Dec 15 2005 at 6:43 AM Rating: Decent
*
238 posts
what happened to /sea all invite x-x? is that also fooked?
#4 Dec 15 2005 at 7:57 AM Rating: Decent
The /sea all 10-** still works, it's when you go to the menu and choose party > find members it pulls up all ppl close lfg. You can still filter that.

Edited, Thu Dec 15 08:00:09 2005 by Stryknine
#5 Dec 15 2005 at 8:43 AM Rating: Good
I never use the find member function so this hasn't really hit me, I just use the /sea all inv XX-XX thingy.
#6 Dec 15 2005 at 11:52 AM Rating: Decent
*
128 posts
There is an easy way to filter the search funtion. Just hit the enter button again right after you search and you can filter by level, race, area, allegiance etc. It is actually quite robust. Of course with all the other things to learn in this game, I guess some newer players probably won't figure that out for a while. So teach them! ^^

Edited, Thu Dec 15 11:56:48 2005 by Audion
#7 Dec 15 2005 at 12:30 PM Rating: Decent
**
281 posts
it's not the change which is stupid, it's the people. It would seem obvious that a person 6 times your level could not xp with you.

Moreso, people don't talk in groups anymore. I mean, how hard is it, if you have no clue, to ask your fellow group members: "what kind of level range should I look for ?"
#8 Dec 15 2005 at 12:58 PM Rating: Decent
**
509 posts
Quote:
4th pt- 4 members, lv range 10-13, the asshat leader invites....a lv 65 whm...O_O w...t....h...


What I am wondering - did the 65 whm ACCEPT the invite? Or was the leader shut down (I am hoping, as probably everyone else is)

If a lvl 65 accepted an invite to the dunes, for an EXP party, not expecting to be a PL, then there is something seriously wrong.
#9 Dec 15 2005 at 1:26 PM Rating: Good
**
327 posts
Sometimes people accept blind invites without asking why they are invited, or simply the WHM didn't check who was inviting him/her. I mean, if you've been LFT for 4 hours straight, when you get a PT invite, even without a message, we can't blame someone to be too damn glad to have a group to check before accepting the invite :p

Quote:
it's not the change which is stupid, it's the people.

That's it. If you give someone a pistol to defend him/herself and that he/she shoots him/herself in the foot, it's his/her fault, not yours :p
#10 Dec 15 2005 at 2:42 PM Rating: Good
***
1,391 posts
Quote:
That's it. If you give someone a pistol to defend him/herself and that he/she shoots him/herself in the foot, it's his/her fault, not yours :p


;;>.> If that ever happens I think I would take the gun away and then shoot them in the head... anyone that stupid shouldn't be allowed to reproduce...
#11 Dec 15 2005 at 11:28 PM Rating: Decent
**
281 posts
Quote:
If that ever happens I think I would take the gun away and then shoot them in the head...


but then there's those pesky details about a lawsuit... ;)
#12 Dec 16 2005 at 12:05 AM Rating: Good
***
1,391 posts
Quote:
but then there's those pesky details about a lawsuit... ;)


<.<;; Well if someone is dead I don't think they can sue you... and if I get arrested I would say justifiable homicide!
#13 Dec 16 2005 at 1:48 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,949 posts
Eh, I dont always feel like typing out /sea all members Blah-blah.

If i'm leader, with a chain heavy group...the quick look for memebers function was GRAND, not always typing something out...waiting...then looking.

I dont know WHAT the point was of changing...It really doesnt seem to have a purpose. Why do I need to see the War/whm level 16 looking for a party as a 58 rdm?

Pointless? Kinda!
#14 Dec 16 2005 at 1:18 PM Rating: Decent
Please. A bullet to the head? There's no need for unnecessary murder. Just shoot his/her reproductive organs; that'd solve the problem quite nicely. ;)
#15 Dec 16 2005 at 2:45 PM Rating: Good
**
346 posts
Katrel wrote:
Please. A bullet to the head? There's no need for unnecessary murder. Just shoot his/her reproductive organs; that'd solve the problem quite nicely. ;)


But would would clean up the bubbley red mess?
#16 Dec 17 2005 at 1:14 AM Rating: Good
**
955 posts
Can't be as bad as this:
http://img356.imageshack.us/img356/9988/haha0si.gif
#17 Dec 17 2005 at 5:15 PM Rating: Good
**
476 posts
Ayrilana wrote:
Can't be as bad as this:
http://img356.imageshack.us/img356/9988/haha0si.gif


. . .

Why. . .
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 43 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (43)