Jophiel wrote:
So what's the dealio with pictures then? Was the intent ever that the proletariat could upload and access their own photos? Or is that that I can just slap in an IMG tag using some premium user's stable of pix? And why is "pix" in Firefox's spellchecker?
If the idea wasn't to let non-premium users upload and use their own photos, then why have a minimum number of posts before you can use the tag? It's the premium guy who has to upload llama **** and face the consequences.
Sorry if this was addressed upthread; the last I heard it was "we're talking about it" and I haven't followed the thread religiously since then.
Edited, Jul 6th 2011 11:38am by Jophiel
It's still under discussion. If it ends up being that non premium uploading of pictures is completely disabled, the minimum posts before using image tags will be reduced to 25 posts to match polls or eliminated entirely.
the llama **** issue was the main reason for implementing the 250 limit in the first place, however since that time there has been some rethink regarding file storage costs for images, etc. We'll let everyone know what gets decided in the end.