ThePsychoticOne the Prohpet wrote:
MDenham wrote:
ThePsychoticOne the Prohpet wrote:
MDenham wrote:
ThePsychoticOne the Prohpet wrote:
MDenham wrote:
ThePsychoticOne the Prohpet wrote:
MDenham wrote:
Threads can be created with titles that don't display at all. This technically falls into a larger category of bugs, issues, and the like that can be exploited by judicious usage of Unicode, most of which aren't terribly relevant and have skipped my mind.
Is that bad?
It's annoying, which is more important.
You can always click the date to get to it anyway.
Perhaps, but I found one other problem that it exposed, and there's a second issue that's sort of related to that other problem that was also annoying me.
You mean how it breaks the bread crumbs?
That, and the "edit post" button also screws with the breadcrumbs.
In what way?
Actually, the same way replies do. Just noticed that.
So, a mockup (all links replaced with links to localhost):
Viewing forum:
Allakhazam's Forums >
Forum Group > Forum Name
Viewing thread:
Allakhazam's Forums >
Forum Group >
Forum Name > Thread Name
Editing/Replying to thread:
Allakhazam's Forums >
Thread Name > Edit Post/Post Reply (as appropriate)
Is it wrong of me to expect that the last case should still have the forum group and forum name listed in the breadcrumbs, since these forums aren't nested particularly deeply? (If this needs to turn into a feature request, or is intended due to trying to remain well-behaved under certain "low" resolutions... eh, just show the deepest four levels under all circumstances, then.)
