Quote:
How is something not original if I thought it up? I could make something that no one has ever thought of in human history, and you would still say "not original."
I say it wasn't original because you're nowhere near the first person here who's posted such a "guide" (expressing more or less the same sentiments) in order to express their observations about
A) the imperfect karma system,
and
B) the predicatble social habits of the forum community.
I didn't accuse you of copying the idea, I just suggested that it wasn't as clever as you'd like it to be.
Quote:
That line of yours has gone stale long ago.
As has, my vitriolic friend, your routine.
We both need some fresh material.
Quote:
You sure do remember a lot about that guy. He must've fascinated you.
At first, he was actually an interesting troll.
I was amused by reading his posts much in the same way some are presently by you.
Near the end, though, it was almost like a different person.
He stopped being wryly intelligent and succumbed to laziness; his diatribes and insults becoming no more clever than those of ordinary sophomoric trolls.
What fascinates me the most is how someone who was clearly so bright degenerated into such a poo-flinging monkey at the end.
Quote:
Oddly enough, I got a sock to scholar in 15 posts by following my rate up guide. Seriously. That's a sad statement for the forum if ever there was one.
Nothing so odd about that. Your points were perfectly valid, even if you used them as an attempt to simply overgeneralize a large body of people in order to throw blanket insults at them.
There are plenty of sad statements for the forum.
If you're truly so concerned about the state of the forum, why aren't you using all that energy to directly troll the admins via PMs? If you want to see something fixed, why not go straight to the source, where the influence is?
Instead, you continue to poke the sheep, loudly proclaiming your wolflike superiority on the outside of the fence.
Are you afraid of the rancher's shotgun?
