I think it's about the relation between action and result. The points are just a smokescreen really.
Folks in the US really do think about sports in the context of "plays". We want to see a distinct action (or set of actions) and a distinct success or failure of that action. Games like Baseball and Football provide that sort of stimulation in spades.
A single pitch can be a strike or a ball. The batter could swing at it or not. Depending on the combination of those things, there can be a base hit or not. You see the action and the result of that action right there.
In football, it's even more dramatic. You have a complete set of men. A flurry of activity that's a clear comparison of the offensive and defensive play, and then a clear result. You gained yards, you lost yards, you stayed the same, or you scored.
Games like Soccer and Hockey just have a continuous flow of action that occasionally results in something. You don't gain yardage, or men on base, or anything like that. The ball just moves around all game long and occasionally ends up in the other guys net. At least in Hockey, you can have power plays when one or more team members are in the penalty box (about the only thing that makes Hockey just a bit more exciting then Soccer, that and the fights).
Basketball is kind of a hybrid. It's the same basic type as Hockey and Soccer, but the use of the hands gives the offensive players more ability to score. In that case, it really is about the number of points scored. Basically, there's more relation between an attack in Basketball and a score or no-score then in Hockey or Soccer. Personally, I don't find Basketball to be that exciting of a game either though. It's still just a bunch of guys moving a ball around constantly, except now instead of just getting an accasional goal, you've got continuous goals and it's about who gets more over the course of the game. Same basic problem IMO.
That could just be my personal preferences about sports though. To me, neither Hockey, nor Soccer (or even Basketball for that matter) really give the viewer the sense that one team or the other is advancing towards a score. The anticipation and buildup that you get in baseball as one team starts to load the bases, or in football as one team moves the ball towards the end-zone is what makes those games exciting. I just can't find it in me to get excited about a shift in game position in Soccer when 99 times out of a hundred, the end result will be no score change.
Edited, Thu May 20 21:45:41 2004 by gbaji