You're still on this?
eldik wrote:
So correct me if i m wrong but calculate your EH as it is now on your gear then replace the Glyph with the brewfest and the other trinket that you have from totc 5 normal with the 60 frost trinket. Calculate the EH that you will theoretically have. Is it lower or higher?
In terms of EH, like I had said previously the Brewfest trinket and the Glyph are pretty much a wash, with the Brewfest trinket winning out slightly. And I have a number of fights where I'll swap it out.
The Corroded Skeleton Key is a better EH trinket than anything I currently have. Of course my EH and total HP would go up if I got it. I've never disagreed with you on that. If I could get it for Triumph tokens, I'd have bought one ages ago. If it dropped from a boss, I'd equip it in a heartbeat. Hell, if it was BoE I'd farm my *** off for it. My only question is -
is it a better investment of Frost badges than the other equipment I could get. In economics - what is the opportunity cost of getting the CSK?
Hence me doing the comparisons of the trinket vs. the cloak vs. the belt earlier in the thread.
Right now, I'm looking at the trinket vs. the chest (Cataclysmic Chestguard) vs. working towards some T10 bonuses. Probably going to go with the Cataclysmic Chestguard because in my current gear, it gives me an additional 2k EH over the CSK.
eldik wrote:
The 60 frost trinket gives more EH than the glyph does.(As I have said i fail to compare trinkets with cloaks or belts or cats with dogs. Trinkets are trinkets belts are belts and Cloaks are cloaks. Just because the OP is mixing up gear and compairing trolls with Gnomes doesnt mean that I have to do the same)
I agree with you, the 60 Frost trinket gives more EH than pretty much any trinket in the game, other than heroic Satrina's/Juggernaut's.
The OP was asking about an investment of Frost Badges though, which means that comparing the relative upgrade of the trinket to the upgrade from the other Frost gear is EXACTLY what you have to do. It doesn't matter how big of an upgrade his trinket slot is if he can get a
bigger upgrade from spending Frost badges on another slot. Gear slot doesn't matter, it's all affecting the same stats.
eldik wrote:
Glyph of imobility is good but why not take a paladin tank in the run as well (mandatory? I dont know) to give improved devo aura +2000 armor and forget about the glyph? I mean If I were so into armor I would take a paladin tank...
Tanks aren't going to change on runs I make. I
do however love to take a Holy Paladin if possible. Most of them also have Improved Devotion Aura.
eldik wrote:
Also ench shamans can give 1380 armor and Druids provide 1050 armor . In a 10 man run lot of theese buffs maybe missing and affect your armor around as much , less or more than having the glyph of imobility with you.
Armor scales linearly. Each point has the same benefit as the one before it. In a fight with heavy physical damage, there's no point in not stacking Devotion Aura + Stoneskin Totem + MotW + Indestructible Potion. I glanced at my armor the other day in ICC10 and it was around 38k (without a Black Heart proc up), while my HP was over 50k. Works for me.
eldik wrote:
The glyph to my opinion is so un-important Xav or not Xav when healers are never moving ( fester boss)and do constant big heals(Holy ligh oveheals)
So run dual stamina trinkets - God knows I do it often enough. Doesn't change my opinion of the Frost Trinket -- phenomenal trinket, but not as good as some of the other Frost gear (though I should point out it's better than it was when I first posted that - Blizzard doubled the absorb effect).