idiggory wrote:
Ah, I see.
Though, in that case, wouldn't it still be easier to 3-tank it? Less incoming damage and the threat-threshold on Kel will be much higher. It isn't exactly to pull hate from a Lock...
Or do they share health pools or something?
They do share health pools in the sense that there is only one health pool to deplete, but the damage you're dealing to Keleseth if he's not Empowered counts for nothing toward the council's death (but it does count for full threat).
Having been a regular tank who had to tank Keleseth (we did it in a pinch cause we couldn't figure out why range tank was dying...this is before we figured out the problem with shadow resistance), I'll say it sucks big time, as we just don't have enough tools to get the Nuclei to us and tank Keleseth effectively.
Though this was while he still melee'd and I had to play keep away, so if he straight up doesn't melee anymore and won't forcibly maintain a 10 yard gap then a normal tank could probably do much better. You're not going to be getting a lot of rage though (and unless perma-plea works on spell hits, Paladins will be running out of mana), so your threat won't exactly be stellar either. The best thing to do is just whoever is tanking Keleseth should be getting every bit of Tricks and Misdirection the group has, as soon as Keleseth becomes Empowered. If you do that it shouldn't even matter what you have tanking it, because they should have a pretty good threat lead to begin with from the first and possibly second Empowerment shifts, plus the threat redirects. Ideally they'll have also gathered enough Nuclei that they can stand still and open up on him to allow maximum dps uptime for the duration of the Empowerment.
It won't be less incoming damage to have a real tank on him, because the lances are unresistable. I'm pretty sure not even the reduction talents that you get as a tank (Protector of the Pack/Defensive Stance/etc) help, as I recall getting 15k hits in the first period before the Nuclei appear.