Incoming Vanish Fix?Follow

From the Patch 3.3.0 notes.


Best. Change. Ever.

The vanish bug is really complicated though, I've been trying it for 4 years but have never managed to replicate it. It's really hard to fix such a thing.

and he's back

And even if he fails at being informed he'll still attempt to blame it on somebody else. It's impossible to play a rogue in PvP and not notice the Vanish bug. I was playing on the reaction Blizz has always given Vanish bug reports; that the Vanish bug is extremely tricky to fix and that they never have been able to reproduce it on their own servers.
http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=14910132351&sid=1
Not that it'll have any effect, but I'll say it anyway: instead of underestimating everyone you might want to go with some neutrality every once in a while. I know 99% of the players/people out there are idiots, but that 1% is still a large number and you're posting in a place where you're most like to find people fitting in there.

Grats on your 10K posts, by the way.

Class is gonna get nerf'd if they don't lower it to .5 seconds.


mark my words.

Yeah, because your sarcasm was ever evident and you've never made stupid posts on the rogue forums.

Logic dictates that you were being stupid again, not that you were being sarcastic.

*********

I've seen Mozared be off with numbers in the past (though IMO it's more like a guy who just doesn't do well at Statics, rather than someone insisting the world is flat). But that doesn't mean he's stupid. Anyone who's PVPed for more than 5 minutes on a rogue has seen Vanish act like a *****. There's a reason 90+% of Rogues use Vanish offensively. It can't be counted on a defensive CD in a TON of situations.

Either way, if you had said "My past experience dictates that you're being stupid, not sarcastic," I wouldn't have had an issue (Mozared might have, but that's another issue).

Past experience isn't "logic" though.

You saying, "You've been wrong about Rogue builds before, so I'm going to assume you're actually too stupid to recognize that Vanish is bugged" isn't logic. It's prejudice (though in your opinion prejudice based rightly on past experience).


One or the other might be nicer. One or the other might be more understandable. One or the other might be more reasonable. But neither is a logical position to take.

Without trying to diss you or being a ***** Theo, can't you just for once admit that you too make mistakes and that this time your "I-spit-on-everybody" attitude has backfired on you?

I know how you think about me, and like you said, I also stopped caring. I know why you say what you do - you judge me on posts I've made more than a year ago of which you never grasped the point. I'm not even saying that was your fault - back in the time the least that could be said about my posts is that they were unclear (and like Mental told you before, yes, I have changed, I won't deny that). It was never my intention to tell you that your cookie cutter builds suck (they're cookie cutter for a reason), but I was trying to tell you that I had my reasons for not liking them and that one of the sources of enjoyment for me in this game is to play around with the specs myself. Which incidentally is part of the reason why I rarely use(d) math; I like to think I'm fairly good as estimating and I don't need to calculate the numbers on a 6% damage bonus on ability X if I know more or less what it will amount to. But if you really want 'proof' or something to show I'm not the dime a dozen huntard, all you need to do is look through my posts (hint: the priest forum). And if you can't be ***** with that, we're just going to go back to ignoring eachother until perhaps at one point you open up again and your ignorance backfires once more. I don't want you to respect me, or anyone for that matter, but I'm just trying to tell you that showing some of it every once in a while will be a positive experience for both you and whoever you're communicating with.

Since you were at least mistaken once on this board, you're stupid too. It's cool though. Pot meets kettle :)

I was refuting that there is no logic involved in me making that argument.

I never said "logic dictates that I'm right," I said "logic dictates that you were being stupid again".

If all you remember of someone is that they have a habit of posting utterly retarded nonsense, does it not make sense that I would make that leap in logic and assume he's a ******?

It's alright; I realize you have something against me. You're probably feeling butthurt by something I've said in the past.

Point 1 to Tab.

Actually, I didn't note my leap in logic, but you're allowed to draw conclusions based on a set of premises.

Mozared has made many stupid posts in the past, and my personal experience says that that's far more likely of a focus for his posts than sarcasm. Logic would be alright with that kind of a prediction.

Yes, I was wrong about the actuality. I never said I was right, because it's already been determined that he was being sarcastic. But are you REALLY saying I was completely wrong to assume that he was being a ****** with how many retarded posts he's made?

Right.