Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Talent build advice from you Goodly Folkes...Follow

#1 Aug 28 2009 at 1:37 PM Rating: Good
*
98 posts
Hey there,

I am newly hit 80, and just getting into the swing of things - I knew my gear was shocking but had little time to change that. Recently I have managed to switch jobs (Daytime! Better pay!) and have been making some Guildie instance runs.

One of the healers we had picked up had suggested that my talent build was wrong, that was why I was sucking at DPS, told me to look him up on Armory and copy his build.

I have to admit, I was sceptical, but thought that I may be missing something - no spirit tap for a start...

Anyway, I have tried it and keep running out of mana - this is where you wise folk come in. Is it because my gear is cr*ppy and not giving me enough MP/5, or would I be better switching to my tried and trusted, and gaining SpTap back?

Anyways, here is the link to my own Armory page,

http://eu.wowarmory.com/character-talents.xml?r=Nagrand&cn=Eylise&gn=Night+Legion

(And if anyone knows how to do those 'tidy and smart and shiny links' instead of pasting the whole URL, please write it down in words of one syllable, preferably in crayon (I do not like red) so that I can gets smarts?

Thanks in advance folks,

DrFolly.
#2 Aug 28 2009 at 2:37 PM Rating: Decent
what people do is just type

[url=website}Name of link[/url}

Replace } with brackets.
#3 Aug 28 2009 at 2:51 PM Rating: Good
It's always good to see what specs are most popular. You can do that at:
http://www.wowpopular.com/

Improved spirit tap looks to be a popular choice for shadow priests wanting to regen more mana. Check out wowpopular. I've never really spent much time as shadow.

As far as the url, you can hand code it as above, or when you type a discription, block the descriptive text and press the URL button above the edit box. Then input the url in the popup box. I'm assuming the markup buttons aren't just a premium option.

Edited, Aug 28th 2009 6:58pm by dadanox
#4 Aug 28 2009 at 2:56 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,684 posts
You've picked up everything in shadow that increases your damage. If you're not running out of mana, you could not change your spec in such a way that your DPS would actually increase. That said, you probably *will* run out of mana on proper raid bosses - I'm not saying your spec is perfect. Regardless, you're probably better off working on your rotation rather than your spec.
#5 Aug 28 2009 at 4:01 PM Rating: Decent
Hmm, not a fan of the site to be honest.

It may be okay for some but a lot of those specs are terrible and/or outdated.

Example: Most popular Mage spec is FFB. FFB is the poor man/gimp person's spec. It means you are not good enough for Fire so you have to use FFB to hit things. Good raiders use Fire or Arcane(and in 3.2.2 Arcane wins)

Ret Paladin, absolutely horrible. If I saw a Ret spec'd that way I'd ask them to respec or go back to questing lol. SoC is junk, and 5/5 Divinity and 0 in SotR?! SotR is among the most important talents available for Ret now.

So use at your own risk, popular may be used a lot, but doesn't mean you want it. It could be a good guideline for most parts though.
#6 Aug 28 2009 at 5:07 PM Rating: Good
Wherever you see a cookie cutter build (including on Allakhazam), it's a starting point to ask yourself "Why do people take that?". It is good to try to understand other people's decisions, then make your own choices.
#7 Aug 28 2009 at 6:49 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,684 posts
It's really even better to make your own build - you will usually end up close to the cookie cutter anyway if you progress in the same line. It's just that a lot of people skip this step. Which isn't always a bad thing - but not always a good thing either.
#8 Aug 29 2009 at 11:52 AM Rating: Good
*
98 posts
Thanks for the info folks, I just was not sure if I was missing something obvious...

Going to have to mess about with this, see what I can drop to take back up Spirit Tap, I've rarely ever had to stop to drink a Tea or a potion. I had just assumed it was down to poor gear and so forth...

Anyways, thanks again Guys 'n' Gals, I'll have a look at the link above, and also at my Talents and so forth...I think my rotation is cool.

Speak soon, and be at peace!

DrFolly.
#9 Aug 30 2009 at 2:33 AM Rating: Excellent
**
679 posts
As of the time of writing you're using my build. Its likely your mana and damage problems are down to gear to be honest. Your spellpower is low as is your hit rating (cap is 290 btw). In fact I would probably go so far as to say that you're probably losing a lot of mana casting spells that never hit. Long story short, get yourself into naxx and gear up (getting the hit trinket from heroic VH would be a good thing also). With a little bit of gear your damage and mana issues will go away.
#10 Aug 30 2009 at 2:40 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Mozared wrote:
It's really even better to make your own build - you will usually end up close to the cookie cutter anyway if you progress in the same line. It's just that a lot of people skip this step. Which isn't always a bad thing - but not always a good thing either.
I would like to say I agree with you, but given the horrors I've seen hunters run around with I suggest everyone to look at the cookie cutter(s) and try to understand them instead of going off and building your own build.

I have in fact seen hunters spend nearly all their talent points in Marksmen and manage to miss some of the best talents in that tree.
#11 Aug 30 2009 at 8:28 AM Rating: Decent
****
4,684 posts
True. But think of this: people who skip a talent do so because they feel they don't need it. If they feel like this, there's two options: A) they're right, they don't need it in the content they're doing - which usually means heroics/leveling and not raids, or B) they're wrong. In the case of B they'll find out they do need the talent soon enough when they pump out a seriously worse amount of damage than everybody else, and in the case of A, B will apply once they get into raiding.

The reason I'm saying what I am is because if someone has the capability to understand what 'DPS' is they will inevitably end up on a decent spec. The reason I'm saying it's not always a good thing is because if everybody would follow this line to the letter there would be an awful lot of noobs holding serious raiders down. The reason I'm saying it's not always a bad thing is because players who do follow this route will end up having a very thorough understanding of their class, even more so than folks who just spec the cookie cutter and follow 'some EJ rotation'. If you make a talent build and it doesn't 'evolve' depending on the encounters your facing or your prestation compared to other players of the same class, you're per definition a windowlicker and a cookie cutter isn't going to help you anyway.
#12 Aug 30 2009 at 11:53 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Mozared wrote:
True. But think of this: people who skip a talent do so because they feel they don't need it. If they feel like this, there's two options: A) they're right, they don't need it in the content they're doing - which usually means heroics/leveling and not raids, or B) they're wrong. In the case of B they'll find out they do need the talent soon enough when they pump out a seriously worse amount of damage than everybody else, and in the case of A, B will apply once they get into raiding.
You're assuming that people think about what talents they take.
Research has proven that in roughly 75% of all cases, people just randomly click talents that look funny.

Quote:
The reason I'm saying what I am is because if someone has the capability to understand what 'DPS' is they will inevitably end up on a decent spec. The reason I'm saying it's not always a good thing is because if everybody would follow this line to the letter there would be an awful lot of noobs holding serious raiders down. The reason I'm saying it's not always a bad thing is because players who do follow this route will end up having a very thorough understanding of their class, even more so than folks who just spec the cookie cutter and follow 'some EJ rotation'. If you make a talent build and it doesn't 'evolve' depending on the encounters your facing or your prestation compared to other players of the same class, you're per definition a windowlicker and a cookie cutter isn't going to help you anyway.
I still prefer the other way around.
Go spec cookie cutter, use the cookie cutter rotation and try to understand it.
Then, when you know what, why and how you can move away from the cookie cutter to improve yourself.

But before that, I'd rather have people limit the damage they do to the raid by following whatever is calculated to be optimal and try to not mess up too much.


Oh, en prestation is geen woord, ik denk dat je performance bedoelde ^^
#13 Aug 30 2009 at 12:04 PM Rating: Good
*
98 posts
thegreatmothra wrote:
As of the time of writing you're using my build. Its likely your mana and damage problems are down to gear to be honest. Your spellpower is low as is your hit rating (cap is 290 btw). In fact I would probably go so far as to say that you're probably losing a lot of mana casting spells that never hit. Long story short, get yourself into naxx and gear up (getting the hit trinket from heroic VH would be a good thing also). With a little bit of gear your damage and mana issues will go away.


Yeah, I thought that my gear would have a big impact on my performance...I am picking up every run I can, and occasionally a PuG run, but conscious that I am not bringing as much to the team as I could.

But thanks mate, Naxx is one of my main goals, gonna get there one day! One day, I shall be a priest to fear, up until then I shall continue cuddling kittens!

:D

DrFolly.
#14 Aug 30 2009 at 2:13 PM Rating: Default
****
4,684 posts
Quote:
You're assuming that people think about what talents they take.
Research has proven that in roughly 75% of all cases, people just randomly click talents that look funny.

That's probably because in 75% of all cases the people clicking the talents is a windowlicker =P. They're going to suck even with a cookie cutter.

Quote:
I still prefer the other way around.
Go spec cookie cutter, use the cookie cutter rotation and try to understand it.
Then, when you know what, why and how you can move away from the cookie cutter to improve yourself.

But before that, I'd rather have people limit the damage they do to the raid by following whatever is calculated to be optimal and try to not mess up too much.

I guess it depends on the people in question. If nobody took the 'long and painful route', we wouldn't have cookie cutters.

Quote:
Oh, en prestation is geen woord, ik denk dat je performance bedoelde ^^

Aye, die twee haal ik altijd door de war omdat ik performance vergeet =P
#15 Aug 31 2009 at 8:44 AM Rating: Decent
**
717 posts
Mozared wrote:
Quote:
Oh, en prestation is geen woord, ik denk dat je performance bedoelde ^^

Aye, die twee haal ik altijd door de war omdat ik performance vergeet =P

I inkthay esethay uysgay are alkingtay olltray.
#16 Aug 31 2009 at 10:32 AM Rating: Decent
******
27,272 posts
Nee, we zitten te ver naar het zuiden om voor trollen door te gaan.
Die zitten in scandinavie en zo, wij hebben klompen, kaas, wiet en ******* Smiley: tongue
#17 Aug 31 2009 at 12:10 PM Rating: Excellent
**
717 posts
Ah, I see.
That reminds me, I need some new shoes and, uh, other things.
<.<
>.>

My brother took his new bride through through Scandinavia on their honeymoon many years ago. He told me that they came across a sculpture in Oslo that closely resembled me. Royal blood lines, I thought, maybe I was adopted. Years later, I found out that they were referring to Sinnataggen. Smiley: cry
I guess I had issues when I was younger.
#18 Sep 02 2009 at 9:28 AM Rating: Good
*****
19,369 posts
Mozared wrote:
Quote:
You're assuming that people think about what talents they take.
Research has proven that in roughly 75% of all cases, people just randomly click talents that look funny.

That's probably because in 75% of all cases the people clicking the talents is a windowlicker =P. They're going to suck even with a cookie cutter.



They'll suck less with a cookie cutter.



Mozared wrote:

Quote:
I still prefer the other way around.
Go spec cookie cutter, use the cookie cutter rotation and try to understand it.
Then, when you know what, why and how you can move away from the cookie cutter to improve yourself.

But before that, I'd rather have people limit the damage they do to the raid by following whatever is calculated to be optimal and try to not mess up too much.

I guess it depends on the people in question. If nobody took the 'long and painful route', we wouldn't have cookie cutters.


They don't take the 'long and painful route' to min/max. The benefits come from understanding the talents and abilities and rotations and the game encounters. Taking a cookie cutter or jumping outside of the box has nothing to do with it. The players who hate cookie cutter simply to be different are the stupid ones. It's funny because by actually taking cookie cutters and not sucking you'll stand out a lot more than if you suck like the millions of other 'unique snowflakes'. Excelling at your class makes you unique, not bypassing talents and abilities that will in fact improve your performance.

Take the cookie cutters and then look at each talent and ability and find out what's so great about it and how it syncs with other things. Once you do that you can start to create your own builds based on your knowledge. By not taking cookie cutter all you're doing is learning the hard way, you're reinventing the wheel. You'll have to try different talents out and find out why they suck. And if you don't take cookie cutter talents prior to that you won't understand how much of a difference a 'sucky' talent is compared to a much more beneficial 'cookie cutter' talent. You can keep saying it works fine for you, while that may be true you really are limiting yourself.


#19 Sep 02 2009 at 10:29 AM Rating: Decent
****
4,684 posts
I think you're missing my point, Mental.

Quote:
By not taking cookie cutter all you're doing is learning the hard way, you're reinventing the wheel. You'll have to try different talents out and find out why they suck.

That is precisely what I'm trying to say. You're reinventing the wheel. Which will probably ensure that you know a damn lot more about the wheel than the fellow next door who just buys one and uses it.

Quote:
You can keep saying it works fine for you, while that may be true you really are limiting yourself.

If you're a windowlicker, sure. I'm not telling people to stay stuck in their own worlds just because they don't like the cookie cutter. I'm telling people to experiment because they'll automatically find out that "Hey, that talent has always worked nice but now that I'm raiding it seems to suck ********* Can I replace those points? What else can I get for them?".

In the end, you will always gain a better class knowledge if you've seen and tried everything (and you will end up with a cookiecutter because of this) than when you'd just copy/paste a build and have a platonic read about how stuff is supposed to work. Your post seems to be focused on the stereotype "I wanna be unique and refuse to spec cookie cutter" types. While I'll agree there's plenty of those around (I once was one myself), that's not what I'm on about. I'm talking about the 'Been there, done that' mentality when it comes to knowledge about specific talents. Not the people who aren't thinking logically anyway.

The only time I'd say grabbing a cookie cutter without thinking is worth it is if you've already got a couple of max-level characters and know the basic drill. There's no need to do basic experimenting all over again if you're jumping from a healadin to a resto druid.
#20 Sep 10 2009 at 4:50 AM Rating: Good
**
631 posts
If you head over to www.elitistjerks.com you'll find posts on the priest forum that explain in huge detail (too much for me to bother paying full attention to) why spirit is now an utterly pointless stat for SPs. The general recommendation is to move the points into imp psychic scream, silence and psychic horror - even though these provide no dps increase whatsoever, the belief is that the occasional utility they provide (I'm looking at you, Faction Champions) is more useful than spirit tap.

Of course, if you're frequently running out of mana, I don't see any reason to stick to this principle and not take spirit tap.

However, I'd recommend learning how to use your shadowfiend and dispersion, as obvious as that sounds. There are a lot of fights when you're forced to stop dpsing temporarily, whether it's because the boss disappears, you have to run, swap targets, etc. These breaks are when you should pop your cool downs and minimise/rule out the time you'd waste if you popped them while dpsing. Alternatively, pop your shadowfiend in that occasional 1.5 second window between refreshing DoTs, when otherwise you might SW:D or just do nothing.

And it goes without saying that you shouldn't wait until you're oom to do something about it - I'll generally look to use my fiend or dispersion when I'm at around 60% mana, if I know it's a mana-intensive fight, so that by the time I'm low again at least one of them will be off cool down.

Edit:

Quote:
Your spellpower is low as is your hit rating (cap is 290 btw). In fact I would probably go so far as to say that you're probably losing a lot of mana casting spells that never hit.


Apologies if I've missed someone else mentioning this, but in case not - as Alliance, while raiding you'll more likely than not have a draenei with you, in which case your hit cap is 262. It's not worth targeting a higher hit rating when you're working on gear, though it can be handy to have an alternative piece (wands make good examples) in your bags on the off chance it's necessary.

Edited, Sep 10th 2009 8:57am by Alestian
#21 Sep 10 2009 at 5:47 AM Rating: Good
**
679 posts
Quote:
why spirit is now an utterly pointless stat for SPs.


Until the patch, at which point we get approximately another 80-100 sp from the talents giving a total of around 200. While the utility of psychic scream and silence might be nice I certainly wouldn't spec into those when spirit tap gives a reasonable increase increase in damage. You're right in your assumption too, those faction champions are the only case in which I can imagine those talents being useful. Besides, for fights with lots of things to dot up the extra mana regen certainly doesn't hurt.
#22 Sep 10 2009 at 6:44 AM Rating: Good
**
631 posts
Indeed, at the moment it's just deciding which of two pretty mediocre options is the most suitable for you.
#23 Sep 10 2009 at 12:43 PM Rating: Good
*
98 posts
Alestian wrote:


However, I'd recommend learning how to use your shadowfiend and dispersion, as obvious as that sounds. There are a lot of fights when you're forced to stop dpsing temporarily, whether it's because the boss disappears, you have to run, swap targets, etc. These breaks are when you should pop your cool downs and minimise/rule out the time you'd waste if you popped them while dpsing. Alternatively, pop your shadowfiend in that occasional 1.5 second window between refreshing DoTs, when otherwise you might SW:D or just do nothing.


Okay, guilty as charged. I do not use my refresh spells as often as I could do, I am one of those who think that I may need it more in a bit....I will try, that is all I can promise!

Quote:
And it goes without saying that you shouldn't wait until you're oom to do something about it - I'll generally look to use my fiend or dispersion when I'm at around 60% mana, if I know it's a mana-intensive fight, so that by the time I'm low again at least one of them will be off cool down.


It may go without saying, but thanks, IRL I am a hoarder and keep things if they could possibly be of value. Perhaps I play my priest the same way? Interesting, and thanks for stating the obvious and making me think about it! I wish some psychologists could do a decent study of online gamers and their characteristics, I think we would find some funky results.

:D

DrFolly.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 287 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (287)