Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Simple Question-- Cat Form like DW?Follow

#1 Jun 05 2009 at 8:19 PM Rating: Decent
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Just a yes or no. I know the Cat's attack speed is 1.0 (according to WoWWiki).

Does it attack with both paws, or just one? (I presume 1, hence the low attack speed, but I'm trying to calculate if I want Crusader or Greater Agility on my weapon).

Crusader's proc chance is 1.667 per hit, and Agility is a passive +25 AP with an additional 1-2% crit and change (falling as I level).

So, if I get a chance to proc for TWO hits every 1 second, it would likely be hard for Agility to compete. But, if it is only one, I'll have to do math (lol).

Thanks.^^

[EDIT]

Did some LOOOOOSE math, and there is a 64% chance to get at least one proc per minute with that slow an attack speed. That seems pretty decent... Now I just need to figure out whether or not the passive AP and crit is better than huge burst AP.

Edited, Jun 6th 2009 12:25am by idiggory
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#2 Jun 05 2009 at 8:21 PM Rating: Good
Only one number flies up, so it's only one hit.
#3 Jun 05 2009 at 8:25 PM Rating: Decent
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Thanks a lot.^^
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#4 Jun 05 2009 at 8:36 PM Rating: Decent
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Not that anyone cares, but I landed on Greater Agility.

Looking at ABILITY modifiers, the extra 200 AP wasn't that impressive. And, since it only came in bursts, it was only so-so. I'd take 1/8th of that, with passive crit, easy.

200 was only like an extra 10 on rip, 2 on Rake's direct damage and 36 with its DoT, and only while it was up.

SO.... yeah.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#5 Jun 06 2009 at 2:31 PM Rating: Good
****
7,732 posts
I've always felt that ferals should have a deep talent to DW fists.

That is all.

Good day.
____________________________
Hellbanned

idiggory wrote:
Drinking at home. But I could probably stand to get laid.
#6 Jun 06 2009 at 5:11 PM Rating: Excellent
****
4,512 posts
My guild continues to think the hit cap is 9%, and we often have "discussions" that consist of me saying "No it's not." and someone trying to provide anecdotal evidence that I'm wrong.

A couple days ago, someone actually told me "Regardless if what the hit cap is, it's still higher for you because you're a feral druid and they technically duel wield."

I cried a little on the inside.
#7 Jun 06 2009 at 7:31 PM Rating: Good
****
7,732 posts
Quote:
My guild continues to think the hit cap is 9%, and we often have "discussions" that consist of me saying "No it's not." and someone trying to provide anecdotal evidence that I'm wrong.

A couple days ago, someone actually told me "Regardless if what the hit cap is, it's still higher for you because you're a feral druid and they technically duel wield."

I cried a little on the inside.


Wow, I mean just wow.

/sympathy
____________________________
Hellbanned

idiggory wrote:
Drinking at home. But I could probably stand to get laid.
#8 Jun 06 2009 at 10:15 PM Rating: Decent
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Quote:
My guild continues to think the hit cap is 9%, and we often have "discussions" that consist of me saying "No it's not." and someone trying to provide anecdotal evidence that I'm wrong.

A couple days ago, someone actually told me "Regardless if what the hit cap is, it's still higher for you because you're a feral druid and they technically duel wield."

I cried a little on the inside.


/gquit

Two reasons:

1. Seriously. Just GLANCE at an internet resource.

2. Dual.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#9 Jun 06 2009 at 10:49 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,512 posts
idiggory wrote:
Quote:
My guild continues to think the hit cap is 9%, and we often have "discussions" that consist of me saying "No it's not." and someone trying to provide anecdotal evidence that I'm wrong.

A couple days ago, someone actually told me "Regardless if what the hit cap is, it's still higher for you because you're a feral druid and they technically duel wield."

I cried a little on the inside.


/gquit

Two reasons:

1. Seriously. Just GLANCE at an internet resource.

2. Dual.


Er, the dual/duel thing was me. He said it in vent. I've always mixed the two up simply because I'm constantly conerned I'm messing it up so I always mix the two.

These people are damn good at what they do otherwise. I'm not sure why there's this constant confusion. It's mainly one person now saying it's 9% simply because he gears for 8% and missed once when he was certain a draenei was in the group. The rest just kinda ignore me. They at least have the spell hit right.
#10 Jun 07 2009 at 2:53 PM Rating: Decent
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Quote:
These people are damn good at what they do otherwise. I'm not sure why there's this constant confusion. It's mainly one person now saying it's 9% simply because he gears for 8% and missed once when he was certain a draenei was in the group. The rest just kinda ignore me. They at least have the spell hit right.


What class is he? Is he sure he missed with a physical attack and not a spell? A few classes have both, but it isn't always apparent it is different.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#11 Jun 08 2009 at 8:55 AM Rating: Good
People also often look at WWS when talking about these things which summarizes ALL manner of non-hits in one category unless you delve further in; I've seen people say the same thing ("I MISSED WITH 8% SEE") but when you actually put the right columns in the report you can see that the "misses" are usually immune hits or something similar.

Next time he refutes it, tell him to post a WWS and point out the exact time index in the log where it says "Player misses target".
#12 Jun 09 2009 at 4:04 PM Rating: Good
The miss % column, when you open it up, includes dodges, parries and misses. This does cause a lot of confusion.

Feel free to direct them to http://www.wowwiki.com/Hit or my Feral Druid Numbers thread at EJ if they think druids are somehow different to the rest of the world :)

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 198 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (198)