Forum Settings
       
This thread is locked

Bored Druid ThreadFollow

#15202 May 06 2012 at 4:42 PM Rating: Good
Sir Xsarus wrote:
I told you twats not to rate people in that wow general thread. You're lucky I don't no rate the lot of you. Smiley: mad


To be fair, I only rated the posts that were really asking for it.
#15203 May 06 2012 at 4:58 PM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Hasn't RAW gotten the same status as Alma and previously varus yet?
#15204 May 06 2012 at 5:28 PM Rating: Good
I dunno. Has Alma ever made severely inappropriate personal attacks to people when debates don't go his way? I've certainly never seen him do it. Varus, I'm willing to believe would do something like that.
#15205 May 06 2012 at 5:49 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Sir Xsarus wrote:
I told you twats not to rate people in that wow general thread. You're lucky I don't no rate the lot of you. Smiley: mad


____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#15206 May 06 2012 at 5:50 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Sir Xsarus wrote:
I told you twats not to rate people in that wow general thread. You're lucky I don't no rate the lot of you. Smiley: mad


lol, it's past the point where Raw talking can be entertaining. Now it just reminds me of everything wrong with humanity.

And, honestly, the thread wasn't even entertaining. Plus, it's not karma camping if its deserved. :P
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#15207 May 06 2012 at 5:56 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
I don't even think I rated anyone.

They should give me a banhammer button because I'm so good at not karma camping people. Seems only fair.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#15208 May 06 2012 at 7:37 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
It's karma camping when I've asked you not to.

RAW's not a bad guy, he just can't handle even a little bit of criticism and immediately retreats into you live in your moms basement insults when he feels threatened. He has made good posts, but he's made enough bad posts and trolled enough that people immediately jump on him. That's a situation of his own creation though, if he reacted with self deprecation or good humour, things would change. I think he occasionally tries, but because he's dug himself deep enough, it would be a long road to hoe.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#15209 May 06 2012 at 7:38 PM Rating: Excellent
****
7,732 posts
As long as there is a hoe at the end of the road I'm sure he'll take it.
____________________________
Hellbanned

idiggory wrote:
Drinking at home. But I could probably stand to get laid.
#15210 May 06 2012 at 8:57 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
Smiley: grin
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#15211 May 06 2012 at 10:04 PM Rating: Good
What do you guys think about casinos? My final paper for my English class was essentially a persuasive essay to my governor encouraging him to legalize commercial casino gambling in Texas.

I've been doing a lot of research on the subject, but am having trouble finding any solid articles on a link between the presence of a casino and the crime rate in an area, positive or negative.
#15212 May 06 2012 at 10:44 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Generally, I don't see much justification for them. Gambling addictions are much easier to fall into than most others with the potential to destroy lives, and I'm not sure I see what good they do.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#15213 May 06 2012 at 10:50 PM Rating: Good
Well, my main appeal is an economic boost, specifically the $4 to $5 billion the state can potentially generate in tax revenue, and that's before taking stuff like increased tourism and more jobs in an area into account.

Also, digg, that view is actually almost exactly what Focus on the Family says about gambling. I don't know if you've heard of them, but they're an ultra-conservative Christian activist group. Check out their website if you're up for a good ragelol sometime.
#15214 May 06 2012 at 11:38 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
I think I need more specifics then. Are we talking about gambling cities or gambling states? NJ, for instance, bans gambling in general. But in Atlantic County (Atlantic City, mostly), they can issue casino licenses. That has made it a tourist attraction, for that reason, which brings a lot of people there.

Problem is, gambling-based economies are REALLY vulnerable. In good years, they do bring in a lot of money. In bad years, they suck a TON out of the state. NJ has been dumping cash into AC for the past decade to try and get people back there. But the problem is that gambling is the attraction. Everything else relies on it, not the other way around. You use the casinos to get people there, so they'll spend money in stores and restaurants. It makes saving the city a huge money sink. There just isn't much else you can do to glamorize it.

That's actually led to some other big issues (including some civil rights debates) because casinos are such a high risk business that laws tend to introduce loopholes to favor them. For instance, NJ banned smoking in places of business that were not tobacco shops or places that generated x% of their revenue from smoking or tobacco, due to second hand smoke. The law excluded casinos, for fear that it would limit the number of gamblers on the floor. Problem is, the law was passed to protect other customers, and more importantly employees, from second-hand smoke (essentially says your boss has no right to make you inhale smoke). So it actually is a big problem that they have these violations. And there's a lot more where those come from, because there's such a high interest in keeping the casino floor a minimally controlled environment.

Las Vegas is going strong because they attract people world/nation wide, so population of gamers isn't an issue. No one else will be competing with them for a long, long time.

The amount of revenue generated by making gaming legal statewide would probably be less than forming a gaming city. But gaming cities WILL crash and burn at some point. And because their revenue was depended on by the state, you'll spend decades rebuilding them. That's where any connection between casinos and crime rates lie, I'd wager. After the local economy dips, you'll end up with a huge number of unemployed workers (either laid off from casinos or other local establishments), and it's even worse if casinos collapse completely. They aren't often bought out--the casino owners have more to gain by concentrating their guests, rather than spreading them thin between buildings.

So casinos are kinda a gamble for the gov't, ironically. They can be great in periods of plenty, but a huge burden in periods of want. I'm more inclined to say its better to focus those funds in less variable industries. Because a gambling city IS going to require state aid at some point.

Honestly, the biggest issue with gambling addictions is that they are more cerebral than a substance addiction. You can't distance yourself from the act--you start turning everything into a bet, a game. You can keep from becoming an alcoholic by drinking in moderation and not allowing yourself to rely on it--that's easy to control. But it's much harder to fight an addiction that you are subconsciously introducing into every aspect of your life.

TL;DR: Gambling can generate a lot of revenue, but it can also suck a lot out of the state. And since they provide a lot of excess when you don't need it, but a lot of burden when you do, it can be rough. That said, this only really applies to casinos/gambling towns. If we are just talking casual gaming, then *shrug*.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#15215 May 06 2012 at 11:55 PM Rating: Good
But what is the likelihood of Texas creating a gambling city like AC by legalizing casinos? Right over the border into California, there's two Native American owned casinos. Now granted, I don't live in either one of the towns that house these casinos, but I don't think they drain the economy during economic downtimes. That said, because they're own by tribes, working there isn't always great. Because they are considered their own sovereign nation, they can get away with things that other places can't. They don't have to pay their employees the official state minimum wage, they can allow smoking inside the buildings (California has laws against smoking inside places like bars and casinos, as does Oregon), and all sorts of other lovely things. I've also heard that the one further south isn't very nice to their non-NA workers.

And I'll add that it's an interesting experience being at the negative end of race discrimination. The casinos openly tell you that Native Americans will be hired over a non-NA individual, if qualifications are equal. I've applied for a job down there a couple times, and knowing full well that they do that, it makes you wonder if they gave that job to a NA over you purely because of race.
#15216 May 07 2012 at 1:35 AM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
I wish we had casinos, but it seems like we only get the online ones and their commercials on TV are annoying the crap out of me. Especially since they're all called the same thing. Always Bet-something, or something-Bet.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#15217 May 07 2012 at 2:50 AM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
Bleh, thought I was completely over my ex until she joined Facebook again.

This calls for getting sh*tfaced/having a rebound relationship where I can move on completely.

And it's mostly because of how hot she was, sadly.

Edited, May 7th 2012 1:51am by Theophany
#15218 May 07 2012 at 3:22 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Shallow Theo, shallow. Better drown it in a deep pool of booze. Smiley: tongue
#15219 May 07 2012 at 4:33 AM Rating: Good
Pigtails, do not be jealous, this guy doesn't even live in the same country as me and then there's the whole issue of me moving to Pakistan where his people are prosecuted and I don't even wanna risk getting laid otherwise because extramarital sex is illegal... yeah, @#%^it, I'm gonna buy a machine gun and shoot goats or something.

Edit: Also, I might be rebounding from a sexless relationship. It's good, though. Plus, that relationship isn't over.

Edited, May 7th 2012 10:34am by Kalivha
#15220 May 07 2012 at 4:53 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Since when is shooting goats with a machine gun a better alternative for sex than *************
#15221 May 07 2012 at 5:40 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Lol @ the latest Dark Legacy Comic. Goooo Druids!
#15222 May 07 2012 at 6:39 AM Rating: Good
I suck at *************

Plus, new experiences! I'll probably not shoot goats, though. Whaddya think about them Talibans? Smiley: lol
#15223 May 07 2012 at 8:33 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
[quote=His Excellency Aethien]Since when is shooting goats with a machine gun a better alternative for sex than ********************* Clearly you've never fired an automatic rifle before.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#15224 May 07 2012 at 8:51 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Kalivha wrote:
I suck at ********************************************************************************** (Excluding shipping)[/url] and you've solved that problem.

[quote=lolgaxe][quote=His Excellency Aethien]Since when is shooting goats with a machine gun a better alternative for sex than ********************* Clearly you've never fired an automatic rifle before.
Well, no. I'm too much of a pacifist to do that. I'd be a terrible terrible soldier (And the only reason I'm not saying the worst ever is that I'm in decent shape).

Edited, May 7th 2012 4:55pm by Aethien
#15225 May 07 2012 at 8:53 AM Rating: Good
**
614 posts
The life.
Sitting outside in the sun, drinking beer, reading Bukowski and listening to Hotel California.
#15226 May 07 2012 at 9:29 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Sir Xsarus wrote:
I told you twats not to rate people in that wow general thread. You're lucky I don't no rate the lot of you. Smiley: mad


I didn't, you're welcome. Smiley: tongue
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
This thread is locked
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 110 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (110)