Quote:
Most people who are Republican are so more do to social issues as opposed to economic ones.
/sigh, I try to pretend that isn't the case, because otherwise I'd hate them all. :(
And I'm totally a socialist at heart. I hate capitalism--I think it's a vile system that does nothing but let the worst of men lord over the best of them (and I use "worst" and "best" in more moral or virtue-based senses).
But that's not to say I like the way many "socialist" gov'ts have done it (and I would argue that the Soviet Union and China were NEVER socialist).
More importantly, I'm perfectly fine with incomes being different--I don't think that's an issue at all. Some people deserve to make more than others.
What I care about is that you don't have people starving to death while others have billions of dollars just sitting around, not circulating or adding to their value of living, just because they can.
Put it this way--Bill Gates has donated something like 40% of his fortune to charities, which is awesome. But his style of living hasn't changed AT ALL, and probably wouldn't if he donated another 20-40%. There's just no reason for him to have that much cash...
Part of the problem with the US is that we view all tax increases as bad--we look at the income drop, but NEVER evaluate what we get in return. We don't consider what paying the tax brings us, only what it takes. So even if the net gain is positive, people get up in arms.
Newsflash America--if 15% of your wages are going to paying for health insurance (either directly or via your employer), then a 10% tax that provides universal health care means that you actually end up with 5% more...