Forum Settings
       
This thread is locked

Bored Druid ThreadFollow

#3752 Dec 14 2010 at 5:55 AM Rating: Good
****
7,732 posts
Kalivha wrote:
Guys, do you know a decent IDE for C++ writing? Don't say Eclipse. It took me two hours yesterday to even get that piece of annoyingness to start up and now it won't compile even though I tried every fix I could find. So, a different one.

I successfully wrote some code that took my laptop considerable amounts of time to get through and decided to switch languages because I really don't want to take ages sitting there waiting for my computer to sort itself out.


I hear Boomkin have a good mastery.

lulz

I have a mac and it comes with one via xcode.

The g++ command line compiler and a good text editor like Smultron or Textwrangler always works.

____________________________
Hellbanned

idiggory wrote:
Drinking at home. But I could probably stand to get laid.
#3753 Dec 14 2010 at 7:43 AM Rating: Good
ElMuneco wrote:
someproteinguy wrote:
Why must so much caster gear have Stam, Int, Crit, Mastery? It's like someone stole the plot from a bad movie and did a remake. There's not much suspense and you know the ending is going to be trash.

I know that was a rhetorical question, but I'll play along.

Because it's easy. Spirit makes it healer-centric, hit makes it DPS-centric. Sticking to just the four shared attributes lets them spend less effort making sure that everyone has enough gear for them. And no one QQs about how Blizzard likes the other type of caster better than them.


Heh, if only that were true! People in my guild today were whining because of the spirit = hit talents that boomkins, shadow priests and ele shamans have, and because it makes it easier for us to get hit capped. Hell, I was hit capped before I stepped into my first heroic, and there's people who have done dozens and dozens of heroics who aren't yet. I don't blame them for being annoyed, but if all they can complain about is that we have an unfair advantage to getting hit capped, I'd say they're pretty well off. On some level it actually hurts us more, because we can reforge our gear for either spirit or hit, and it takes away a lot of our more important stats (after hit capped of course) dps wise.

Speaking of which, I seem to be having issues with my dps. I need to reinstall a damage meter so I can keep track of it better. Apparently on the last boss in heroic ToT (which is a huge pita by the way...) I was only doing 4.1k dps. This was on a guildie run, and it was kind of embarrassing since the other two dps were doing 1-2k more dps than me. It also didn't help that the healer was a complete jerk. I'd been warned by another person in the guild that he was, but I was trying to give him the benefit of the doubt. I don't mind constructive criticism, but don't treat me like I'm an idiot or talk down to me when this is my first time in a particular dungeon and I'm trying to get the hang of things.

Edited, Dec 14th 2010 8:56am by PigtailsOfDoom
#3754 Dec 14 2010 at 8:39 AM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
Did you replace your 2t10 bonus, or is it just worse overall?


Never had 2pT10, but 200 on a crit? Does the amount it ticks for decrease over time, or is it just the tick interval?
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#3755 Dec 14 2010 at 10:46 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Grand Master Alchemist Mazra wrote:
Does the amount it ticks for decrease over time, or is it just the tick interval?


Yes the amount it heals decreases overtime. The first couple of ticks do the bulk of the healing. I don't know how much it continues to decrease over the additional added ticks you get from having extra haste. Though I imagine the healiness keeps getting less, and I'm assuming that is what you're seeing. *shrugs*
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#3756 Dec 14 2010 at 11:32 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
Quote:
Guys, do you know a decent IDE for C++ writing? Don't say Eclipse. It took me two hours yesterday to even get that piece of annoyingness to start up and now it won't compile even though I tried every fix I could find. So, a different one.

I've never had problems with eclipse, but you could try MS.

When I'm doing c or C++ programing I like using make files. The editor then is just an editor, and I do all my compiling on the command line.

Edited, Dec 14th 2010 11:33am by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#3757 Dec 14 2010 at 12:58 PM Rating: Good
Hmm, I guess I could just use a CLI compiler.
Or stick to pascal because I'm lazy. I just see how it takes like 10+ minutes to run some of my programs (don't ask) and I sort of hope writing in a better language might cut down on that time; people seem to agree that C++ code is fast. Right now, I want fast.

I'm just really unfamiliar with the language so an IDE would feel safer.

Gonna download GCC anyway.
#3758 Dec 14 2010 at 1:11 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Resto Stuff has been updated with the gemming information (oops!). Horse, let me know if there's anything else you'd like me to add before you start smearing lipstick on that mess.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#3759 Dec 14 2010 at 2:25 PM Rating: Good
****
7,732 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
Resto Stuff has been updated with the gemming information (oops!). Horse, let me know if there's anything else you'd like me to add before you start smearing lipstick on that mess.


Should be good, I'm planning on redoing it later today so if anyone has stuff to add now is the time to do it.
____________________________
Hellbanned

idiggory wrote:
Drinking at home. But I could probably stand to get laid.
#3760 Dec 14 2010 at 2:54 PM Rating: Excellent
**
970 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
I'd still trade for some haste, it seems rarer these days.

Yay for reforging I suppose. Smiley: smile

Oops, forgot about haste. I'm still leveling, so I'm going by armor class and primary stat, then if the ilvl is higher, it's probably an upgrade.

Fortunately, expertise over 6% isn't wasted when soloing, that's all I'll say for it.
#3761 Dec 14 2010 at 3:31 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
What are you making Khaliva?
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#3762 Dec 14 2010 at 4:24 PM Rating: Good
Random maths bits to substitute the lack of programming in my computing course at the moment.

Stuff from projecteuler.net
#3763 Dec 14 2010 at 4:33 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
Learn how to program in ruby. It's awesome.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#3764 Dec 14 2010 at 4:39 PM Rating: Good
****
7,732 posts
Kalivha wrote:
Random maths bits to substitute the lack of programming in my computing course at the moment.

Stuff from projecteuler.net


Looks interesting, have all the problems been solved? Either way looks to be a fun diversion.
____________________________
Hellbanned

idiggory wrote:
Drinking at home. But I could probably stand to get laid.
#3765 Dec 14 2010 at 5:26 PM Rating: Good
Horsemouth wrote:
Kalivha wrote:
Random maths bits to substitute the lack of programming in my computing course at the moment.

Stuff from projecteuler.net


Looks interesting, have all the problems been solved? Either way looks to be a fun diversion.


Every problem has the number of people that have solved it in an extra column when you look at the list. So yeah, some of them only by a handful of people, though.

I actually solved one of them with a calculator because it took less than a minute that way.

The thing is, my programming experience is kind of limited.
I've done a couple of months of VB courses about ten years ago (remember none of that), half a year of Modula II and half a year of Java at some point between 2006 and 2008, which was far too advanced for me and I didn't get any of it, and now a couple of months of Pascal.
And of course the odd HTML, lua, PHP etc. when it was needed but that hardly qualifies as programming experience.

I actually think I "get" Pascal enough for these problems (solved 5 so far with it), but I found its limits already and everyone keeps telling me to learn C++ so I should do that. Right?
#3766 Dec 14 2010 at 6:48 PM Rating: Good
****
7,732 posts
Kalivha wrote:
Horsemouth wrote:
Kalivha wrote:
Random maths bits to substitute the lack of programming in my computing course at the moment.

Stuff from projecteuler.net


Looks interesting, have all the problems been solved? Either way looks to be a fun diversion.


Every problem has the number of people that have solved it in an extra column when you look at the list. So yeah, some of them only by a handful of people, though.

I actually solved one of them with a calculator because it took less than a minute that way.

The thing is, my programming experience is kind of limited.
I've done a couple of months of VB courses about ten years ago (remember none of that), half a year of Modula II and half a year of Java at some point between 2006 and 2008, which was far too advanced for me and I didn't get any of it, and now a couple of months of Pascal.
And of course the odd HTML, lua, PHP etc. when it was needed but that hardly qualifies as programming experience.

I actually think I "get" Pascal enough for these problems (solved 5 so far with it), but I found its limits already and everyone keeps telling me to learn C++ so I should do that. Right?


I'd use C++ but I have the most experience with that language. Its all about what you are most comfortable with, it is the same as the spoken word in that you can say anything with any one of them, just some are better at expressing certain things than others.
____________________________
Hellbanned

idiggory wrote:
Drinking at home. But I could probably stand to get laid.
#3767 Dec 14 2010 at 7:01 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Just ran Vortex Pinnacle for the first time. Didn't know the final fight so died on the first electrical storm. After which the rest of the group did the fight with the Paladin tank healing himself and others.

But Bears... Bears are OP. Smiley: rolleyes
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#3768 Dec 14 2010 at 7:16 PM Rating: Good
Horsemouth wrote:
I'd use C++ but I have the most experience with that language. Its all about what you are most comfortable with, it is the same as the spoken word in that you can say anything with any one of them, just some are better at expressing certain things than others.


After looking at C++, I'd say that it simplifies things greatly.

Like, I can probably write all the maths stuff with less than half the lines of code I have to use in Pascal. Pascal is just missing so many functions I want.

Also, I used to hang out in this IRC channel where people talked like they were programming in C++ (or something similar), actually. I never realised what language it was until now. One of the things that bothered me with Pascal inherently was that you'd use = instead of ==, := instead of = and <> instead of !=, because I used those on IRC, lols.
#3769 Dec 14 2010 at 7:47 PM Rating: Excellent
*
63 posts
Horsemouth wrote:
Need help in figuring out how to structure the resto section in a manner consistent with the rest of the new sticky.

Not really sure how to do it, hoping for some ideas. I'll just work around it for now and if nothing clever comes up, just wing it and change it later. We have all the info just not sure of how to organize it with witty headlines.

Must have witty headlines, not having them is not an option.

Kalivha wrote:
After looking at C++, I'd say that it simplifies things greatly.

Like, I can probably write all the maths stuff with less than half the lines of code I have to use in Pascal. Pascal is just missing so many functions I want.

Also, I used to hang out in this IRC channel where people talked like they were programming in C++ (or something similar), actually. I never realized what language it was until now. One of the things that bothered me with Pascal inherently was that you'd use = instead of ==, := instead of = and <> instead of !=, because I used those on IRC, lols.


C++ is very elegant that way. <> is just silly as a statement anyway.

Mazra wrote:
Just ran Vortex Pinnacle for the first time. Didn't know the final fight so died on the first electrical storm. After which the rest of the group did the fight with the Paladin tank healing himself and others.

But Bears... Bears are OP.


When I was first leveling a few times the whole group would die on the first boss in BRC when he would chains then I'd go on to solo him the rest of the way. :P
#3770 Dec 14 2010 at 9:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Druidsock wrote:
Need help in figuring out how to structure the resto section in a manner consistent with the rest of the new sticky.

Not really sure how to do it, hoping for some ideas. I'll just work around it for now and if nothing clever comes up, just wing it and change it later. We have all the info just not sure of how to organize it with witty headlines.

Must have witty headlines, not having them is not an option.


Why can't I just spam Tranquility? Healing spells explained

Facerolling and you: and PvE tips, rotation, etc

Tri-spec r 4 loserz, oh wait... : Raid build

Stat values (hint: Reforge everything)

----

Okay, so I'm not so witty this late at night... Smiley: tongue

also I can't think of any tree jokes...

And one more thing. I <3 this, lol'd and stuff.

Screenshot

Edited, Dec 14th 2010 7:52pm by someproteinguy

Edited, Dec 14th 2010 9:21pm by someproteinguy
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#3771 Dec 15 2010 at 2:22 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Kalivha wrote:
Every problem has the number of people that have solved it in an extra column when you look at the list. So yeah, some of them only by a handful of people, though.
The first one in the list doesn't look hard at all, just a lot of work. But when you get to problem 3 I'm completely lost already...
#3772 Dec 15 2010 at 2:58 AM Rating: Good
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Kalivha wrote:
Every problem has the number of people that have solved it in an extra column when you look at the list. So yeah, some of them only by a handful of people, though.
The first one in the list doesn't look hard at all, just a lot of work. But when you get to problem 3 I'm completely lost already...


The first one took me like 15 minutes. Second one was only slightly longer, all other ones I've done were much more complicated (and some actually took the computer considerable time to calculate). Except 5, which I did in Notepad, manually.

Generally (for most of them, including the third one), you can just go through all the numbers from 1 to <insanely high number> and test if they fulfill the requirements the question asks for. That's probably not the most elegant way to go about it, but it's easy.
#3773 Dec 15 2010 at 5:34 AM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
And one more thing. I <3 this, lol'd and stuff.

Screenshot


It's awesome, because it only shows that when you're a Druid and have done the Swift Flight Form quest chain. Others get a standard "Thank you for helping" comment.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#3774 Dec 15 2010 at 5:34 AM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
And one more thing. I <3 this, lol'd and stuff.

Screenshot


It's awesome, because it only shows that when you're a Druid and have done the Swift Flight Form quest chain. Others get a standard "Thank you for helping" comment.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#3775 Dec 15 2010 at 6:55 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Kalivha wrote:
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Kalivha wrote:
Every problem has the number of people that have solved it in an extra column when you look at the list. So yeah, some of them only by a handful of people, though.
The first one in the list doesn't look hard at all, just a lot of work. But when you get to problem 3 I'm completely lost already...


The first one took me like 15 minutes. Second one was only slightly longer, all other ones I've done were much more complicated (and some actually took the computer considerable time to calculate). Except 5, which I did in Notepad, manually.

Generally (for most of them, including the third one), you can just go through all the numbers from 1 to <insanely high number> and test if they fulfill the requirements the question asks for. That's probably not the most elegant way to go about it, but it's easy.
It does look interesting, but I can see that even for the easy ones my knowledge of mathematics is inadequate.
#3776 Dec 15 2010 at 6:57 AM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Too. Much. Math!

Synaptic overload imminent.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
This thread is locked
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 114 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (114)