Archfiend Goggy wrote:
Again you're referring to me, I wonder why that is? Why do you fail at realising that this isn't just me. Sorry but this is you being blinkered.
You're the one who sited the reference of having to stand back and self heal to keep from killing yourself. If you didn't want this to include you, you shouldn't have posted your opinions on the matter, and you sure as hell shouldn't have taken shots at people for posting theirs.
Quote:
Quantified above but I'll repeat here for posterity. We're the only class that has to harm itself to this extent to achieve mid-table DPS. Make sure you read it this time. Oh sorry is that a lame insult? Maybe that's because you continually point the finger whilst continuously failing to acknowledge your own comments. An entire community? I only see the same three faces, coming up with the same tired comments, trying endlessly to prove themselves right, whilst continuously failing to realise that I always said it was not about being right, it's about an opinion and whether people are bothered about it.
Who gives a **** if you have to damage yourself to use your best dps seal? It's been proven to you that unless you're clueless or you've got oblivious healers, it's not going to prevent you from playing the game, so why does it matter? Warlocks damage themselves to restore mana. Why should warlocks have to trade health for mana when paladins can just hit Divine Plea and get mana back without the health loss? Why should warlocks have to trade health for mana when mages can conjure a mana emerald or evocate? Why should warlocks have to trade health for mana when a druid can innervate someone? Out of
all of the melee dps classes/specs, ret paladins are the most able to recover lost health. Ergo, the lost health from recoil is only going to kill you if you're inattentive/inept, and believe me...there are lots of other ways inept/inattentive people can gank themselves in a raid.
Quote:
Again we see your ability to be obtuse the nth degree. I responded to Ruen, who started this. If you fail to see that then there is no point in discussing this further. I don't need to play the victim, I'm big enough and ugly enough to fight my own battles, but if you keep returning to post lies then I'm going to take you to task on it.
And you telling people to write 100 lines about reading was kosher? (Especially from someone who has flat out said they're too lazy to read.) You telling people that didn't agree with the idea that SoB/SotM is a problem were "failing to grasp" the issue was fine? And then you telling someone you rated them down because you didn't approve of an expression they used, regardless of the rest of the content of their post...that was totally on par with good people skills in your mind? Because all of that happened before Ruen's comment to you.
Before. So you can take little shots at people and that's well and good and they have to take it but when someone is a bit more direct with you,
they get blamed for the conflict?
**** off.
Quote:
It started to come round to that, until you, and others, went off-topic again and repeatedly try to make it sound like your the innocent guys here. I'll tell you something, which should not be a surprise, but who knows, repetitiveness will not make you right.
No, but every time you post to repeat yourself, the community gets another chance to force your base karma down. c wut I did thar?
Quote:
That's your opinion, personally I think the three of you have shown some degree of stupidity.
I've been just as venomous as anyone else in this thread, but I've got one thing going for me that you don't: I'm right.
Quote:
Again, I think your wrong. As I have said previously, but I'm sure it won't be the last time. I don't care about the karma system or what you and your partners in crime think you gain by rating me. I'm astonished that you think this thread is worth so much of your time, but then given the level of posting I have seen from the three of you, repetitive, obnoxious, unrelenting. I can only assume there's a lack of maturity.
If you don't care about the karma system, then why would you tell someone else you rated them down? Oh...you care, ergo they must care, and as such they'll think twice about using the term, "QQ" again, amirite?
Quote:
My approach? As I have said, you want to insult me and take me on, then fine. I can look after myself. You want to try and make this some form of sermon about how you and your friends think this forums should run, then be prepared.
No, Goggy, you can't look after yourself. If you could, you would have changed your approach or let this die a long time ago. That would have been taking care of yourself, though I don't expect you to be able to understand that. You've lumped the most vocal opponents of your stupidity into one category and assumed we're friends. We're individuals responding to you on a forum. Several individuals...no wolf packing...just more people disagreeing with you and nobody agreeing with you. You don't see that though, and I get that. I doubt you'll ever see it. Soon...oh yes, soon...anyone with their filter turned on won't see
you anymore, either.
Sooo...give ya another opportunity. Intelligent discourse? Or more, "QQ victim Goggy QQ?"
Something tells me I already know the answer.
