Quote:
Body and Soul *New Talent* - When you cast Power Word: Shield, you increase the target's movement speed by 30/60% for 4 sec, and you have a 50% chance when you cast Abolish Disease on yourself to also cleanse 1 poison effect in addition to diseases.
This talent is deep enough in the Holy tree to preclude you from picking it up with a real Disc build. It's hybrid (and no Penance) or deep Holy if you want it.
The QQ all over the o-boards over this spell is a sight to behold. Translated into non-whinespeak, it reads something like this:
O-PEEPS: "Um, why did you put a PVP talent so deep in a PVE tree?"
BLUE: "Because we want all trees to be PVP viable."
O-PEEPS: "Why? Why do you feel like Holy needs to be PVP viable when we already have a PVP healing tree?"
The reasons this talent is deep Holy rather than Disc or low-level Holy are obvious to me. But I found the other question interesting. Personally I don't get it. Not only because IMO options are good and complaining about them is weird, but also because I might as well ask, "Why did you feel Disc needed to be PVE viable when we already have a PVE healing tree?"
Making Disc a viable raid healing spec was a wonderful thing. It enriched the class. It offered two really varied playstyles. Making Holy PVP viable (and I'm not sure this one talent does it, no matter how cool, but that's another discussion) can do the same thing. We've already got a spec that's highly defensive, survivable, and efficient. Holy PVP would be another matter. Huge heals, but less mana and squishier. The glass cannon of healers. Adding a mobility talent, what basically amounts to a sprint, IMO fits right in with that.
So what say all of you to this o-board controversy?