Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Dual Wield SpecFollow

#1 Jan 29 2009 at 8:58 AM Rating: Default
Does Dual Wield specialization effect Mutilate OH dmg? Sorry if this is an obvious answer.
#2 Jan 29 2009 at 9:03 AM Rating: Decent
**
920 posts
Hmmm..I'm not sure. Maybe I should read the tooltip about it. Oh well.

Seriously, I feel sorry for you.
____________________________
It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer. -Albert Einstein

Feyras, ****** Superhero wrote:
I think I'm going to sig myself, just to be different.


PSN tag: DavidChrist. If you add me, send me a message telling me who you are, please.
#3 Jan 29 2009 at 9:10 AM Rating: Default
Im glad that there are so many kind people in this world such as yourself. Kill yourself.
#4 Jan 29 2009 at 9:13 AM Rating: Good
****
4,684 posts
The two posts above this one fail. Seriously, no need to be a jack if there's no need to be one, Fey.

To answer the question, yes, it does. When formulated like "the damage done by X" Blizz is generally talking about "ALL damage done by X". They specify if they're not.
#5 Jan 29 2009 at 9:16 AM Rating: Default
Thank you Mozared. I wasn't sure if it was auto-attack only or not. I appreciate that and it really helps to be sure.
#6 Jan 29 2009 at 9:35 AM Rating: Decent
**
920 posts
Normally I'm not a "jack", but when it is so obvious that the answer to his question is in the tooltip I can't help it. It isn't my fault he is a windowlicker that can't read and understand at the same time.

Edited, Jan 29th 2009 12:42pm by Feyras
____________________________
It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer. -Albert Einstein

Feyras, ****** Superhero wrote:
I think I'm going to sig myself, just to be different.


PSN tag: DavidChrist. If you add me, send me a message telling me who you are, please.
#7 Jan 29 2009 at 9:59 AM Rating: Default
I hope you enjoy that tingling sensation that you always have, called loneliness.
#8 Jan 29 2009 at 10:09 AM Rating: Default
And please tell me where it says that it effects 'all' off hand dmg and abliities in your little link.
#9 Jan 29 2009 at 10:25 AM Rating: Excellent
***
1,505 posts
VorpalRuin wrote:
And please tell me where it says that it effects 'all' off hand dmg and abliities in your little link.


Dual Wield Spec tooltip wrote:
Increases the damage done by your offhand weapon by 50%.
#10REDACTED, Posted: Jan 29 2009 at 10:39 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I don't see it say the words 'all' or 'abilities' in that, am I reading over that?
#11 Jan 29 2009 at 10:42 AM Rating: Decent
**
920 posts
It doesn't have to say "all" it says "Increases damage done by your offhand weapon by 50%." Enough said.
____________________________
It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer. -Albert Einstein

Feyras, ****** Superhero wrote:
I think I'm going to sig myself, just to be different.


PSN tag: DavidChrist. If you add me, send me a message telling me who you are, please.
#12 Jan 29 2009 at 10:42 AM Rating: Default
Distract doesn't mention anything about the target being in combat, so I guess it doesnt matter if the target is in combat or not to use it huh?
#13 Jan 29 2009 at 10:45 AM Rating: Good
***
1,006 posts
Children, halt the peen contest.
"Windowlicker" made me laugh though.
#14 Jan 29 2009 at 10:47 AM Rating: Decent
**
920 posts
Your beating a dead horse dude. Just accept that the question probaly wasn't the best one you have ever asked in your life. It more than likely wasn't the worst question either.
____________________________
It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer. -Albert Einstein

Feyras, ****** Superhero wrote:
I think I'm going to sig myself, just to be different.


PSN tag: DavidChrist. If you add me, send me a message telling me who you are, please.
#15 Jan 29 2009 at 10:50 AM Rating: Default
I said "Sorry if this is an obvious answer." in my very first post. You're an @sshole that could have very well answered nicely, but you chose to show your true colors. Why would you immediatly chose to be pessimistic instead of kind to someone who is curious?

Edited, Jan 29th 2009 1:51pm by VorpalRuin
#16 Jan 29 2009 at 10:52 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
19,369 posts
VorpalRuin wrote:
Distract doesn't mention anything about the target being in combat, so I guess it doesnt matter if the target is in combat or not to use it huh?


Uhh, you can use distract in combat.
#17 Jan 29 2009 at 10:52 AM Rating: Good
***
1,006 posts
Seriously, if you guys don't cut it out somebody's going to post that picture of the retarded kid winning the special olympics.
#18 Jan 29 2009 at 10:52 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
19,369 posts
VorpalRuin wrote:
I said "Sorry if this is an obvious answer." in my very first post. You're an @sshole that could have very well answered nicely, but you chose to show your true colors. Why would you immediatly chose to be pessimistic instead of kind to someone who is curious?

Edited, Jan 29th 2009 1:51pm by VorpalRuin


He might be an ******* but you're showing your true colors as well. Just sayin'.
#19 Jan 29 2009 at 10:54 AM Rating: Default
Wonder why when I tryed to distract a passing mage last night with adds following him I got the message "target is in combat" then. :(

And thank you, MentalFrog, for jumping on the insult bandwagon because I wasn't sure about 1 aspect and I asked to clarify. It must been terrible for you to have to read it, and I apologize for that.

Edited, Jan 29th 2009 1:56pm by VorpalRuin
#20 Jan 29 2009 at 10:54 AM Rating: Good
***
1,505 posts
VorpalRuin wrote:
Distract doesn't mention anything about the target being in combat, so I guess it doesnt matter if the target is in combat or not to use it huh?


Sorry Mental, but Vorpal is right. you cant use distract on targets in combat.

Edited, Jan 29th 2009 7:56pm by Nikkelmand
#21 Jan 29 2009 at 10:56 AM Rating: Good
***
1,006 posts
ninja edit, but I'm watching you Nikklemand

Edited, Jan 29th 2009 1:58pm by EonSprinter
#22 Jan 29 2009 at 10:57 AM Rating: Decent
**
920 posts
The thing was I wasn't trying to be an @sshole from the get go. I just posted the link to get you to read it. The statement about feeling sorry for you was completely based off the fact that I know when certain people get in the forums and read your question you will get flamed.

Now, when you said I should kill myself that is when I decided to be an @sshole. I can be a great @sshole if I want. Trust me my original post was not me being one. Of course the "ever so great Mozared" had to come in here and take up for you because he knows what it is like to post stupid questions.
____________________________
It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer. -Albert Einstein

Feyras, ****** Superhero wrote:
I think I'm going to sig myself, just to be different.


PSN tag: DavidChrist. If you add me, send me a message telling me who you are, please.
#23 Jan 29 2009 at 10:59 AM Rating: Default
Thank you Nikkelmand.

Who is showing their true colors now MentalFrog? You must be a windowlicker too because you don't know how Distract works. /sarcasm
#24 Jan 29 2009 at 10:59 AM Rating: Excellent
***
1,505 posts
EonSprinter wrote:
ninja edit, but I'm watching you Nikklemand



I read distract as blind for some reason...
#25 Jan 29 2009 at 11:02 AM Rating: Default
How else was I supposed to take this then if it wasn't meant to be demeaning?

"Hmmm..I'm not sure. Maybe I should read the tooltip about it. Oh well.

Seriously, I feel sorry for you"

I'm glad you feel that the ability to be a great ******* makes you a better person. I will talk to you the same way that you talk to me.
#26 Jan 29 2009 at 11:09 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,006 posts



Feyras wrote:
The thing was I wasn't trying to be an @sshole from the get go.


Feyras wrote:
Seriously, I feel sorry for you.


Feyras wrote:
I wasn't trying to be an @sshole from the get go.


Feyras wrote:
I feel sorry for you.


Feyras wrote:
I wasn't trying


The evidence suggests that being an ******* is effortless for the man in question.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 288 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (288)