Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

WF on mainhand, and Flame Tongue on Off-Hand Follow

#1 Nov 01 2008 at 8:57 AM Rating: Decent
Use WF on main hand and Flame tongue on Off hand, with lava lash.

and does the off-hand have inc dmg or something?
#2 Nov 01 2008 at 10:01 AM Rating: Good
***
3,737 posts
This tends to not be worth sacrificing the second WF proc chance from your off-hand weapon.

You can visit elitistjerks for exhaustive calculations on the matter if you're really interested in why this is the case. But the general observation tends to be you'll do more damage doing 2xWF and just using Lava Lash without the 25% bonus from FT on your off-hand
#3 Nov 01 2008 at 12:49 PM Rating: Decent
ok so double WF seems the way to go,

and sorry for nub question just started playing the shaman after a while, u can't use lava burst with FT on ur offhand right?

What i have seen a few shamans do is, have a 2.7 main hand weapon with WF, and a dagger on the off hand with FT,

Is that a good idea?
#4 Nov 01 2008 at 3:00 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,121 posts
they just said wf/wf was way to go, if you only have a fast off hand then you have no choice but you should get a nice slow off hand and use wf on both weapons. Besides with the way Maelstrom weapon works wf/wf is preferred you would get more procs.
#5 Nov 10 2008 at 10:38 AM Rating: Default
*****
19,369 posts
sushisbloodhoof wrote:
ok so double WF seems the way to go,

and sorry for nub question just started playing the shaman after a while, u can't use lava burst with FT on ur offhand right?

What i have seen a few shamans do is, have a 2.7 main hand weapon with WF, and a dagger on the off hand with FT,

Is that a good idea?


What?

What do you mean you can't use lava burst with flametongue? Lava burst has nothing to do with FT. Doesn't matter what weapons you're using. Lava burst crits if you have flame shock applied to the target.

Why are you asking if 2.7 wf and a dagger ft is a good idea? Everyone just told you that wf/wf is the way to go.

And it's a stupid idea. Even more so with a dagger. Lash is offhand dmg only. That means daggers with or without FT suck for lash damage.

+25% of sucky damage still = sucky damage. It's not going to outdo wf/wf unless it's changed.




#6 Nov 10 2008 at 10:38 AM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
Oh and you don't get lava burst until 75 anyways.
#7 Nov 24 2008 at 8:16 PM Rating: Good
OK OK OK


Here's the deal.


Devs put a talent for lava lash FOR A REASON


because at some point when you acquire points in elemental fury (5pointtalent), WF/FT WILL OUT DPS 2xWF. Where that point is depends on your gear. If you read the EJ forums, you can see that WF/FT WILL OUT DPS WF/WF. The FT dmg can crit, counts as fire/magic dmg, and will count towards other procs.

There's a lot of this question on the worldofwarcraft.com forums, lotta ppl putting up their calcs and 2cents, they've all came to the same conclusion as EJ,

AT SOME POINT WHEN SPECING ELEMENTAL FURY POINTS, WF/FT WILL OUT DPS WF/WF. It's there for a reason, spec it, roll WF/FT when u get the talent points. that is, if you have the glyph for extra LL damage w/ FT.

WF/WF should not out dps WF/FT at 80, w/ proper talents. If it is, your calcs are wrong, or YOU're doing something wrong


Edit : BTW, forgot to mention that WF/FT will keep WF procing on your main hand weapon, not allowing for ur OH to steal the WF proc for a weak hit.

also, WTF is any enhance shammy doing w/ ANY DAGGER FOR ANY REASON????!?!?!?!?!??!?!

Flanksteak - 75 Tauren Shaman - Eitrigg
Odang - 70 Night Elf Rogue - Darkspear
Olmighty - 70 Gnome mage - Darkspear
Murlocholmes - 64 Undead Death Knight - Eitrigg



Edited, Nov 24th 2008 11:21pm by mattrochelle

Edited, Nov 24th 2008 11:23pm by mattrochelle
#8 Nov 25 2008 at 7:31 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
mattrochelle wrote:
Devs put a talent for lava lash FOR A REASON

Faith in the devs? Ah-hahahahahahahahaha...


Quote:
because at some point when you acquire points in elemental fury (5pointtalent), WF/FT WILL OUT DPS 2xWF. Where that point is depends on your gear. If you read the EJ forums, you can see that WF/FT WILL OUT DPS WF/WF. The FT dmg can crit, counts as fire/magic dmg, and will count towards other procs.

Could you link this, please? Last I heard the concensus at EJ was that slow WF/WF is still max DPS for an Enhancement Shaman. WF/FT only yields more auto-attack damage if you have a fast off-hand.

Quote:
There's a lot of this question on the worldofwarcraft.com forums, lotta ppl putting up their calcs and 2cents, they've all came to the same conclusion as EJ,

No, there have been a lot of people posting unfounded opinionated statements. Any math (or good math, anyways...) I've ever seen presented has shown WF/WF to still yield max DPS for a Shaman.

Quote:
AT SOME POINT WHEN SPECING ELEMENTAL FURY POINTS, WF/FT WILL OUT DPS WF/WF. It's there for a reason, spec it, roll WF/FT when u get the talent points. that is, if you have the glyph for extra LL damage w/ FT.

WF/WF should not out dps WF/FT at 80, w/ proper talents. If it is, your calcs are wrong, or YOU're doing something wrong


Edit : BTW, forgot to mention that WF/FT will keep WF procing on your main hand weapon, not allowing for ur OH to steal the WF proc for a weak hit.

also, WTF is any enhance shammy doing w/ ANY DAGGER FOR ANY REASON????!?!?!?!?!??!?!

So you're not only suggesting that WF/FT will out-DPS WF/WF, but you're suggesting it will do so even when applied to a slow off-hand? Now this I really need to see the math on. Please start linking these posts.
#9 Nov 25 2008 at 10:04 AM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
mattrochelle wrote:

Devs put a talent for lava lash FOR A REASON


Yeah so players will start using the useless talents. Yeah there are talents nobody (at least nobody who knows what they're doing) even considers.

Speaking of which, why are there useless talents in the first place? I mean the devs put them there for a reason right?
#10 Nov 25 2008 at 10:27 AM Rating: Default
FYI elemental fury does not apply to FT. Is is not a spell. Y dont u try it out instead of just assuming that it will Plus you have no facts you based your arguement on. If FT procced elemental fury then it would also proc elemental dev and it "doesnt".UR wronge and therefore delete your post MATT. You should know how to play you shaman first nub.
#11 Nov 26 2008 at 12:20 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,188 posts
mattrochelle wrote:
OK OK OK


Here's the deal.


Devs put a talent for lava lash FOR A REASON


because at some point when you acquire points in elemental fury (5pointtalent), WF/FT WILL OUT DPS 2xWF. Where that point is depends on your gear. If you read the EJ forums, you can see that WF/FT WILL OUT DPS WF/WF. The FT dmg can crit, counts as fire/magic dmg, and will count towards other procs.

There's a lot of this question on the worldofwarcraft.com forums, lotta ppl putting up their calcs and 2cents, they've all came to the same conclusion as EJ,

AT SOME POINT WHEN SPECING ELEMENTAL FURY POINTS, WF/FT WILL OUT DPS WF/WF. It's there for a reason, spec it, roll WF/FT when u get the talent points. that is, if you have the glyph for extra LL damage w/ FT.

WF/WF should not out dps WF/FT at 80, w/ proper talents. If it is, your calcs are wrong, or YOU're doing something wrong


Edit : BTW, forgot to mention that WF/FT will keep WF procing on your main hand weapon, not allowing for ur OH to steal the WF proc for a weak hit.

also, WTF is any enhance shammy doing w/ ANY DAGGER FOR ANY REASON????!?!?!?!?!??!?!

Flanksteak - 75 Tauren Shaman - Eitrigg
Odang - 70 Night Elf Rogue - Darkspear
Olmighty - 70 Gnome mage - Darkspear
Murlocholmes - 64 Undead Death Knight - Eitrigg



Edited, Nov 24th 2008 11:21pm by mattrochelle

Edited, Nov 24th 2008 11:23pm by mattrochelle


The only scenario that WF/FT will outDPS WF/WF is when upgrading a slow, Green OH to an epic Dagger. FT will crit a lot, but it scales poorly with Slow weapons and Lava Lash scales poorly with Fast weapons.
#12 Nov 26 2008 at 12:22 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,330 posts
Lava Lash is not useless, it is actually very nice, but WF/FT is just plain stupid.
#13 Dec 01 2008 at 9:52 PM Rating: Good
***
1,188 posts
Dread Lord SunSoarer wrote:
Lava Lash is not useless, it is actually very nice, but WF/FT is just plain stupid.


Definitely not useless, just doesn't scale very well with fast weapons.

I use it A LOT. Just have to make sure none of the other DD abilities aren't on cooldown before using LL, however.

Edited, Dec 1st 2008 9:52pm by TheYardstick
#14 Dec 02 2008 at 2:40 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,121 posts
This is a bit of an older topic and at this point wf or ft on off hand i am not sure.

Here are some facts I do know to be true, ft scales well with faster weapons as it will provide more dps, while its damage is lower it is better dps.

Lava Lash scales better with slower weapons for higher damage, and so does Storm strike.

WF will help apply Maelstrom weapon buffs faster, ft does not, but ft will help Maelstrom weapon do more damage from spell damage buff (also static shock).

now based on a lot of things we can not say what devs wish for us to use for our off hand. While devs have made enhancement a bit more caster'ish wf still buffs there new talents as well. Many will say well lava lash gets improved by ft yes this is true but they may have done this because ft scales better with faster weapons so will be weaker with ft used, slower weapons scale better with wf, and will not need the bonus as much as ft would.

Ft on off hand will mean no leaching the wf with off hand but will also lower our chance to proc wf.

Now as far as FT being affected by elemental talents i am not sure of at this point, but elemental does seem worth specing into as enhancement either way(although none of them state that they affect FT damage). I do know FT will not proc elementasl devastation or focus though.

At this point I am not sure what Blizzard wants enhancement to imbue on their off hands to yield more damage, but what I can say is it is definitely more viable then it was in the past. It may be that they wanted to offer a variety of game play.
#15 Dec 03 2008 at 10:30 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,188 posts
jmfmb wrote:
This is a bit of an older topic and at this point wf or ft on off hand i am not sure.

Here are some facts I do know to be true, ft scales well with faster weapons as it will provide more dps, while its damage is lower it is better dps.

Lava Lash scales better with slower weapons for higher damage, and so does Storm strike.

WF will help apply Maelstrom weapon buffs faster, ft does not, but ft will help Maelstrom weapon do more damage from spell damage buff (also static shock).

now based on a lot of things we can not say what devs wish for us to use for our off hand. While devs have made enhancement a bit more caster'ish wf still buffs there new talents as well. Many will say well lava lash gets improved by ft yes this is true but they may have done this because ft scales better with faster weapons so will be weaker with ft used, slower weapons scale better with wf, and will not need the bonus as much as ft would.

Ft on off hand will mean no leaching the wf with off hand but will also lower our chance to proc wf.

Now as far as FT being affected by elemental talents i am not sure of at this point, but elemental does seem worth specing into as enhancement either way(although none of them state that they affect FT damage). I do know FT will not proc elementasl devastation or focus though.

At this point I am not sure what Blizzard wants enhancement to imbue on their off hands to yield more damage, but what I can say is it is definitely more viable then it was in the past. It may be that they wanted to offer a variety of game play.


There was a post made by devs a while back that they intend to keep WF as the main DPS imbue. The changes to FT allow the FT OH imbue to yield actual DPS, but against a Shaman of equal quality gear that has slow/slow, WF is still better hands down. FT just now has the potential to do some decent DPS, but it will likely never be intended to outDPS WF in a deep-Enhancement spec.
#16 Dec 04 2008 at 12:04 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,121 posts
Quote:
There was a post made by devs a while back that they intend to keep WF as the main DPS imbue. The changes to FT allow the FT OH imbue to yield actual DPS, but against a Shaman of equal quality gear that has slow/slow, WF is still better hands down. FT just now has the potential to do some decent DPS, but it will likely never be intended to outDPS WF in a deep-Enhancement spec.


To be honest I wouldn't put too much faith in blizzard really knowing what they want to do with shaman, seems they are having a hard time adjusting shaman to play the way they want still.

These changes still make FT look like they may want it to be viable, again wf really does not lose anything in the changes and would still look to be just as good, so at this point time and lots of math is the only way to tell.
#17 Dec 04 2008 at 1:47 AM Rating: Good
***
2,396 posts
jmfmb wrote:
Quote:
There was a post made by devs a while back that they intend to keep WF as the main DPS imbue. The changes to FT allow the FT OH imbue to yield actual DPS, but against a Shaman of equal quality gear that has slow/slow, WF is still better hands down. FT just now has the potential to do some decent DPS, but it will likely never be intended to outDPS WF in a deep-Enhancement spec.


To be honest I wouldn't put too much faith in blizzard really knowing what they want to do with shaman, seems they are having a hard time adjusting shaman to play the way they want still.

These changes still make FT look like they may want it to be viable, again wf really does not lose anything in the changes and would still look to be just as good, so at this point time and lots of math is the only way to tell.

Actually, in this case Blizzard did know what they were doing. It's us, the players, that didn't understand what they were doing.

Lava Lash is not intended to encourage us to use a fast off-hand. Neither is Flametongue. Lava Lash isn't there to encourage us to use Flametongue on our off-hand. Lava Lash is meant to be used either way, but Flametongue makes fast off-hands less terrible because it scales inversely with weapon speed, unlike Windfury which scales along with weapon speed. Lava Lash's bonus damage from having Flametongue on your off-hand is also intended to compensate for having a fast off-hand; the bonus damage from having Flametongue applied is intended to make up for the damage lost by not using a slower weapon.

All of this was implemented so that Shaman have a choice when gear drops. Let's face it; sometimes a dagger does drop from a boss in an instance or from a quest that is just better than the slow off-hand you have on. The system we have now allows us to incorporate this weapon, and I believe Blizzard's intention is that slow WF/fast FT be = to slow WF/slow WF so that the Shaman can make use of the gear available to him. It's just opening up more options for us.

Edited, Dec 4th 2008 4:49am by Gaudion
#18 Dec 05 2008 at 4:39 AM Rating: Decent
**
387 posts
Maybe someday in the future they will make Stormstrike and Lava lash so that they do damage based on the DPS of the weapon, just like the highest talent in the protection paladin tree (or in some sense the future dps of feral druids). Now this would be interesting because you could indeed use a fast offhand with FT without the damage loss from SS and LL. Maelstrom charges will slower with no WF on offhand, but ...

Oh well.
#19 Dec 11 2008 at 10:07 AM Rating: Decent
*
64 posts
I still use slow/slow double WF, but i am really interested in seeing some hard math on using a slow WF / fast FT. Especially if said numbers also focus on the dps increase from not losing WF procs to your offhand. Would be a fun read.
#20 Dec 11 2008 at 12:12 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
Last I checked, all the math was still pointing to slow WF/slow WF being superior for DPS. As I said, FT just makes a fast off-hand worse to a much lesser degree. If you're at all interested in researching it yourself you can head over to Elitist Jerks and trawl the forums there.
#21 Dec 14 2008 at 9:02 PM Rating: Good
36 posts
Quote:
Flametongue Weapon

Flametongue has become much more viable due to the merging of Hit and Crit rating into a universal rating. Flametongue is now capable of performing as well or better than Windfury on the Off Hand in most cases. Flametongue scales best on a fast weapon because of the flat 10% spell damage coefficient across weapon speeds, but fast weapons interact poorly with Lava Lash. Fast Weapons are still viable in the OH though, as long as the fast weapon will be a significant stat and DPS upgrade over your currently equipped weapon, to outweigh the loss to Lava Lash through the gains in Flametongue DPS.


From the EJ Enchancement section. So it looks to me like everyone is right. FT gives you the basic spell damage bonus, which is good for your shocks and MW bolts while saving WF procs for your MH. However slow/slow with 2xWF is also shown to work extremely well.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 308 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (308)