SomnusSleeper wrote:
Seeing as how the discussion was referring to ret OPness in PvP I would hope you were. I'm glad you ignored the majority of the posts in this thread to come up with something as stupid as your next comment :
No, the thread is referring to changes to the paladin class, specifically the ret talent build. There's more to the game than PvP, and if you scream too hard about a class/spec being too OP in PvP, their PvE performance suffers.
Quote:
Quote:
JotW isn't a survival tool. It's mana regen. You can have a million mana to burn and if you don't use it for anything, you're dead. What you use it for is the survival tool. TAoW is nice. It's not game breaking, but it's nice.
That's incredibly asinine of you to say, last I checked Guadion and the rest of the posters have an IQ of over 30. I think they realize that classes with a mana bar need to use said mana to cast spells. As for Replenishment, I'm surprised that you don't think 3.75% of your max mana in addition to the other 33% of your base mana granted by the talent is "not all that significant". More to the point, TAoW is an incredibly strong talent in terms of PvP. An instant cast heal for ~2k? If you don't think that a damage spec casting that every 2 judgement crits isn't game breaking I'd like to smoke whatever it is that you are.
3.75% is trivial. It's also trivial to people in your group. 33% of base mana can be significant, but you'll still go OOM if you're using everything in your ******* for a prolonged period of time. Especially if you're tossing out spot heals/cleansing/etc.
The point, since you seem to have missed it, is that ret paladins without JotW are horribly mana inefficient. That's why, pre 3.0.2, leveling a ret pally meant putting 21 points into holy...so that you could actually heal between fights without having to sit and drink after every two encounters. The purpose wasn't to promote combat rotations or recommended specs...it was to illustrate the lackluster mana management that is at the core of a ret paladin and to illustrate why JotW is not only balanced, but necessary. At 70, my JotW returns just shy of 1k mana every 8 seconds. Within that span of time, I can burn upwards of 1500 mana. More if I'm fighting groups of demons/undead. With a mana pool hovering around the 4-4.5k mark, you can see how the mana return from JotW is not going to prolong a standard combat rotation indefinately, and the focus right now is on boosting classes through PvE content, not tweaking them for "balanced" PvP play.
In addition, the classes are "balanced" around expansion content. They're "balanced" around the idea of PvP at level 80. It would be a waste of development time for Blizzard to try and tweak balance for 70 PvP when it's all going to be obsolete in less than a month. Anyone screaming that they need to be balanced for level 70 PvP needs to give their head a shake. Arena season 4 is over. Maintaining a rating at this point is more or less moot, since the S3/4 gear people would pick up with it will be obsolete come Season 5. Whether it's a ret pally or a pair of mages bursting you down in a BG, you're still going to die...a lot.
I'm in favor of the changes to ret that have been made and are pending. While it's fun as hell to obliterate mobs while doing dailies before my Judgement cooldown is up, it's not necessary. From a PvE standpoint, I have no problem with ret damage being spread out instead of so much of it coming up front.
What I haven't got much use for is the QQ crew working themselves into a frothing rage over the preliminary performance of classes that have been adjusted with the expansion in mind. Level 70 in Northrend is going to be rather simple for most people heading into the expansion, but from what I'm hearing out of beta, the difficulty is ramped up rather quickly and the 'OP' performance of the classes now will put them on an adequate footing in latter WotLK content, but by no means breezing through the way everyone is cruising through TBC now. When enough people are at 80 and have the extra 10 talents spent in "utility" trees, then Blizzard can take a serious look at who is doing what and what results they are getting by doing so. At that point, balance will become a reasonable objective. Right now, it's fruitless for Blizzard to try for balance, it's pointless for players to expect it, and moronic to QQ over.
Quote:
Quote:
Ya, I'm the guy who stopped telling you to be such a victim in the shaman forums QQing about shaman in PvP. Not content with that, apparently you've branched out to QQ here.
Carry on.
QQ moar.
I had originally planned on making this post less personal but the QQ comment was both obnoxious and unnecessary. Much as I often disagree with what Gaudion says, in this case he is right on and treating him in a condescending and often belligerent manner will get this discussion nowhere.
Have you read Gaudion's posts? He's next in line for the crown of the obnoxious, condescending kingdom of QQdale, and he's ******** about something that will have absolutely no purpose or meaning come Nov. 13th. The only thing worse than ******** about something that's not important is ******** about something that hasn't even happened yet, so I'm giving him a little credit that he's not going to QQ about what he thinks is going to happen at level 80.
Edited, Oct 24th 2008 12:26am by AureliusSir