Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Kings vs. SotPFollow

#1 Oct 13 2008 at 12:07 PM Rating: Decent
32 posts
As the subject states, just curious on opinions of Kings vs SotP. I realize that we will primarily be using Sanctuary, so Kings will not be needed by us much, with possible exceptions of course. I also see that SotP gives us 15% more damage on SoR, etc. However, wouldn't Kings benefit a group/raid more? I am not in Beta so I do not know if that 15% is more important for threat, or does kings imporve the group/raid more in progression.

Thanks.
#2 Oct 13 2008 at 5:28 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,594 posts
Holy just about can't pick up Kings, and it's a personal argument for prot.

Ret can get it without even thinking, though. And Ret will be a nice spec overall. If you have a Ret in your guild, have him get Kings so you can skip it for better stuff. Otherwise, he'll be putting 5 points into.. nothing useful.
#3 Oct 13 2008 at 9:30 PM Rating: Good
***
1,609 posts
I don't agree. Neither of the Retribution builds i have planned (PvE and PvP) include Kings. I'm gonna have Imp. Blessing of Might on constantly, and i run Dps/Dps in the arena.

The ret tree is stuffed with so many talents to improve personal dps, or survivability i think you'll find Kings is a much less common blessing post-patch
#4 Oct 13 2008 at 11:42 PM Rating: Good
***
1,047 posts
I don't plan on speccing into SotP because threat is virtually a non-issue on PTR. However, I also don't plan on speccing Kings - my guild's holy pallies are picking that up at 70 (they can't spec into any of the crit in Ret at 70, so virtually nowhere else to put points).
#5 Oct 14 2008 at 8:22 AM Rating: Default
***
1,503 posts
the way i see a Ret pve build atm, it will leave 5pts free to get Kings as a 10/61. for pvp, the pts will be tighter and Kings will be skipped.

Blizz still has the trees screwed up a bit. 2 tank blessings that you have to spec into! pally talents are so thin atm. might as well have 1 talent per tier per tree, with arrows pointing straight through to the bottom tier. label the arrows, Holy/Tank/DPS repectively.

we are the only class with only 2 first tier talents per tree(imp kings is BS). most disheartening is this: we are a 'support class' in every sense of the phrase. however, we have the lowest # of talents of all the classes(sham are same) at 76 total talent blocks. by contrast: warrior = 86! DK = 85. Druid = 83. Priest = 80.

see how many talents we need to be able to 'play' vs how many talents improve our playing.
#6 Oct 14 2008 at 8:36 AM Rating: Excellent
***
1,131 posts
I play a Protection Paladin, and I really don't see myself even bothering to put 1 point into kings, let alone 5 points. There are other talents that are going to be WAY more useful as a Prot. Since they put Kings/Improved Kings on the first tier of the Prot Tree I could definitely see PvE specced Ret or Holy Paladins taking this talent instead of having the Prot Pally take it.

For certain I will be skipping it at 70, and I may not ever take it at all, even when I hit 80.
#7 Oct 14 2008 at 11:32 AM Rating: Good
***
1,264 posts
My philosophy as a PvE healer is to get talents that are useful for the entire raid, not just me personally. From this perspective, I see Kings as a must have. I will definitely do my best to get 5 points in Kings since the 10% buff to stats is still one of the best buffs in the game.
#8 Oct 14 2008 at 1:29 PM Rating: Excellent
**
970 posts
azwing wrote:
My philosophy as a PvE healer is to get talents that are useful for the entire raid, not just me personally. From this perspective, I see Kings as a must have. I will definitely do my best to get 5 points in Kings since the 10% buff to stats is still one of the best buffs in the game.

I can see an argument for Imp. BoM + HotC, even at 70. Especially if still on 5/10 person content, thus more likelihood of being the only paladin in the party/raid (in which case everyone can get BoM/BoW as appropriate). I'm not convinced by the argument, but I can see a case for it.
#9 Oct 17 2008 at 8:03 AM Rating: Good
***
1,131 posts
ElMuneco wrote:
azwing wrote:
My philosophy as a PvE healer is to get talents that are useful for the entire raid, not just me personally. From this perspective, I see Kings as a must have. I will definitely do my best to get 5 points in Kings since the 10% buff to stats is still one of the best buffs in the game.

I can see an argument for Imp. BoM + HotC, even at 70. Especially if still on 5/10 person content, thus more likelihood of being the only paladin in the party/raid (in which case everyone can get BoM/BoW as appropriate). I'm not convinced by the argument, but I can see a case for it.


I would like to study the math on this a bit more... Giving EVERYONE (even in a 5-man dungeon) a 10% boost to all stats increases their Armor, Attack Power, Critical Strike, Health, Mana Pool, and Mana regeneration. It seems like overall a 10% buff to all stats would be more beneficial than BoM (for physical DPS) and BoW (for casters/healers).

This is one of the reasons I am annoyed with Prot really needing to take other talents over spending 5 points in Kings, because it is the best Pally buff for everyone in my opinion, especially now that BoSalv is out.
#10 Oct 17 2008 at 8:14 AM Rating: Good
**
370 posts
Might is unquestionably the best buff for Ret pallys (especailly with the ap-->sp conversion) and I think rogues, wars and hunters, too.
#11 Oct 17 2008 at 9:06 AM Rating: Good
***
1,131 posts
Tsarducci wrote:
Might is unquestionably the best buff for Ret pallys (especailly with the ap-->sp conversion) and I think rogues, wars and hunters, too.


Good to know! Now I won't feel so bad about not giving them Kings! My wife's Hunter tends to perfer Wisdom tho... In Kara last night with all of the other buffs she had and with Trueshot Aura and Aspect of the Hawk active, she had over 2000 Attack Power and 36% crit chance. She was more worried about potentially going OOM than she was about having EVEN MORE attack power at that point :)

I wasn't about to argue (it is my wife after all), so I gave her BoWis.
#12 Oct 17 2008 at 9:46 AM Rating: Decent
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Color me clueless, but what does SotP stand for? I looked over all the talents and I simply can't find anything that would abbreviate to SotP.

Seal of the...?
Shield of the...?
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#13 Oct 17 2008 at 9:52 AM Rating: Good
***
1,131 posts
Seals of the Pure
#14 Oct 17 2008 at 9:59 AM Rating: Decent
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Doh, it's the very first tier.

Thanks.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#15 Oct 17 2008 at 10:14 AM Rating: Good
**
970 posts
Mazra wrote:
Color me clueless, but what does SotP stand for? I looked over all the talents and I simply can't find anything that would abbreviate to SotP.

Seal of the...?
Shield of the...?

Since the OP was talking about increasing threat, presumably Seals of the Pure (http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=20332):
"Increases the damage done by your Seal of Righteousness, Seal of Vengeance and Seal of Corruption and their Judgement effects by 15%."
#16 Oct 17 2008 at 10:38 AM Rating: Good
***
1,131 posts
ElMuneco wrote:
Mazra wrote:
Color me clueless, but what does SotP stand for? I looked over all the talents and I simply can't find anything that would abbreviate to SotP.

Seal of the...?
Shield of the...?

Since the OP was talking about increasing threat, presumably Seals of the Pure (http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=20332):
"Increases the damage done by your Seal of Righteousness, Seal of Vengeance and Seal of Corruption and their Judgement effects by 15%."


I think between the Major Glyph that adds 10% damage to Judgements and Seals of the Pure adding 15% to seals/judgements, Prot Paladins could theoretically be said to be OP; however, no one will complain because the only BG you ever see a Prot Pally in is AV and even that is rare.

Instead, the masses will rejoice that Prot is OP because they won't ever die in a dungeon or raid unless they do something truly stupid. There may be some QQ from the recount-watchers when they see Prot Paladin topping the damage meters in Kara on a regular basis, but mostly it will be, "We got Prince down in 58 seconds and nobody died! I kan haz my lootz now!"
#17 Oct 17 2008 at 11:58 AM Rating: Decent
I honestly am somewhat worried about getting kings in a raid. In BC, I never saw a raid that didn't have a holy paladin. I never saw a holy paladin in a raid that did not have kings. Therefore I never saw a raid that kings was not an option.

Prot paladins don't seem to want to take kings since they rarely buff themselves with it. Ret might have ROOM for kings, but does that mean they will take it in their optimal raiding build?

I can easily see raids that you cannot get kings.
#18 Oct 17 2008 at 1:14 PM Rating: Decent
**
343 posts
As for myself... yeah... myself. I play solo a lot so I don't care if others want me to get kings. Yeah, I may be booed a little when I get a group and don't have it, but eh.
Quote:
Instead, the masses will rejoice that Prot is OP because they won't ever die in a dungeon or raid unless they do something truly stupid. There may be some QQ from the recount-watchers when they see Prot Paladin topping the damage meters in Kara on a regular basis, but mostly it will be, "We got Prince down in 58 seconds and nobody died! I kan haz my lootz now!"


You guys made up my mind on the last standing five pts. SotP. Thanks :-)

On the flip, if a Holy Pally can get it, they should. I love the help of a holy pally and welcome one (even seek one). Adding that buff might push them over the edge in five mans to be asked to come heal. In raids, and guilds it might be a must. But I agree...
Quote:
I can easily see raids that you cannot get kings.
#19 Oct 17 2008 at 1:15 PM Rating: Good
***
1,264 posts
Quote:
I can easily see raids that you cannot get kings.


To somewhat contradict myself (see my earlier post) I think I agree with you here.

Turning Kings into a 5 point talent makes it a lot harder to sacrfice points elsewhere. In my current holy build, I could not pass up going deep enough into the Ret tree to get the extra 8% crit from Conviction (5/5) and Sanctified Seals (3/3). Right now I'm 43/0/18. I'm still trying it out to get a feel for it, but at level 70 I can't really see getting Kings for 5 points instead of going into Ret for 8% crit or deep enough into Holy to get DI.

I'll stick by my philosophy of getting talents to help the raid, but in this case at level 70, I couldn't do it.

Edited, Oct 17th 2008 3:09pm by azwing
#20 Oct 18 2008 at 2:59 AM Rating: Decent
**
591 posts
Every pve ret build should have kings. And since BoM and battle shout no longer stack, you will most likely never be buffing yourself in raid with BoM.

But more importantly the question shouldn't be between SotP and Kings it should be between SotP and Imp Judge/Benediction/HotC. All of which are better than SotP imo.

Edited, Oct 18th 2008 5:58am by mahlerite
#21 Oct 18 2008 at 5:01 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
mahlerite wrote:
Every pve ret build should have kings. And since BoM and battle shout no longer stack, you will most likely never be buffing yourself in raid with BoM.


What's more likely is that warriors will start using Commanding Shout, rather than refreshing Battle Shout every two minutes.
#22 Oct 18 2008 at 7:29 PM Rating: Decent
**
591 posts
Quote:
What's more likely is that warriors will start using Commanding Shout, rather than refreshing Battle Shout every two minutes.


There won't be 2 warr in your raid?
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 155 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (155)