Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

3.0.2 on PTR; Rogue changesFollow

#27 Sep 15 2008 at 8:32 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,875 posts
nerfed woulda been internal cooldown

this was removed, part of a big overhaul to remove RNG from the game

....at least in a game breaking way
#28 Sep 15 2008 at 11:09 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,039 posts
Dear god theo,
i didnt really stop to think that mutilate and blade flurry now have some synergism. that's a scary build.

Edited, Sep 15th 2008 2:04pm by EnthalpyTheBurninator
#29 Sep 15 2008 at 11:15 AM Rating: Default
*****
13,048 posts
mongoosexcore wrote:
with hit/crit/haste rating now being shared between melee and spell

does that mean the (previously only) spell haste gems will become melee haste gems as well?

if so, worth regemming for? particularly for people with haste-based pve gear?


and im going mutilate if it stays non-position dependant

i got decent daggers banked, not sure if ill go full for HFB, but most likely i will

Edited, Sep 15th 2008 10:41am by mongoosexcore

This is FINAL. Mutilate will not have a positional requirement, as it hasn't for the past 2-3 weeks.

And no, it will never be worth it to regem haste. That's ******* retarded, Mongoose.
#30 Sep 15 2008 at 1:17 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,875 posts
fair enough theo

just thought since (i heard at least) haste gets better the more ya have, you know.. if you got a bunch if at some point it provides more dps then ap or agi gems

not that ill be doin that, not the point, just kinda curious (thats why i ask, and not buy a buncha new gems lol)

been learnin all my new priest sh*t lol... rogue changes and mechanics are fading away a lil bit

messed up a lot of sh*t last time i did arena lol... sh*t just goes south all day for me when im out of practice

--- --- --- ---

and i dont believe anything blizzard to do to be final lol.... while im confient muti will stay like that

i got a small feelin a bunch of dagger 'tards are gonna go

"DAGGARZ FROM DE FRONT? RUIN MY LORE MORE!" "QQ MUTILATE EZ MODE, WHY NOT JUST LET US USE SWARDZ?" "I DIDNT SPEC 41+ IN ASSASSINATION TO PLAY COMBAT"

and all sorts of retarded sh*t

lol know what i mean?

Edited, Sep 15th 2008 5:13pm by mongoosexcore
#31 Sep 15 2008 at 1:52 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,684 posts
And if they have good arguments, what's wrong with that?
#32 Sep 15 2008 at 2:02 PM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
mongoosexcore wrote:
lol know what i mean?

No, not really. You can't post something that's well-thought out and organized to save your life.

Dagger players have whined, and Blizzard basically responded, "well you wanted us to make daggers viable again, so which is it? Viable or ****** and positional?"

That pretty much shut them up.
#33 Sep 15 2008 at 8:27 PM Rating: Good
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Overlord Theophany wrote:
Demea wrote:
I'm still a little disappointed with the way the talent trees got shuffled around. It makes for a lot of filler talents to get to the good stuff, and you still miss out on things in low levels of other trees.

Still, once I hit 80, this will probably be my PvE spec, although the build that Theo linked will work as well depending on weapons.

C'mon Demea, I thought this was obvious.

I c wut u did thar.

Guess I should've read the talent description more closely. I glanced at it and saw the reduced poison time and said "lol, pvp talent."

Reading comprehension > Me.

Edit: Also, this for leveling. I freaking heart Riposte for solo questing, and the extra parry is nothing to scoff at. Better than Imp Sprint and a throwaway point in NoS in that context.

Edited, Sep 15th 2008 11:26pm by Demea
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#34 Sep 15 2008 at 9:32 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,875 posts
Overlord Theophany wrote:
mongoosexcore wrote:
lol know what i mean?

No, not really. You can't post something that's well-thought out and organized to save your life.

Dagger players have whined, and Blizzard basically responded, "well you wanted us to make daggers viable again, so which is it? Viable or sh*tty and positional?"

That pretty much shut them up.


lol i write as i think; want coherent and thought out?

While the change may have quieted the cries of those who wanted to play daggers and play for performance, I got a sneaking suspection that the dagger players who played as daggers 'because it fits the character' will complain since it ruins what they may see as 'how the class works.'

Will it be enough to change it back to the old way? I doubt it, but you never know with Blizzard... I mean, they thought 'Dispersion' needed to be nerfed...

I never put full faith in anything with them, because the last time I did... they gave casual players so much 'free' gear, that now I can't run a normal 5 man for the fun of it... because no one does them anymore.



and thats the best youll ever get from me, so feel special or something

Edited, Sep 16th 2008 1:28am by mongoosexcore
#35 Sep 16 2008 at 12:32 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
Overlord Theophany wrote:
mongoosexcore wrote:
lol know what i mean?

No, not really. You can't post something that's well-thought out and organized to save your life.


I knew exactly what he meant.
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 119 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (119)