Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Most epic troll post ever...Follow

#1 Sep 05 2008 at 12:46 PM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
Link

It's an oboards link, just warning you guys, so you'll see the normal douchebaggery, asshattery, and moronic posting that makes you love the oboards and makes you throw up a little inside your mouth at the same time.

It's a pretty epic troll, it's on page 18 and I still don't think more than 10% of the people looking at the math/gibberish posted by Mat understand that he's just throwing numbers and variables together.

In other news, there's one post that made me crack up in that thread, on page 11.

"There needs to [be] a pact about using mathematical superiority for good and good alone, not for lulz."

Pretty much sums up the thread in one line.
#2 Sep 05 2008 at 1:13 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,680 posts
Quote:
I'm gonna need to see more math I don't understand to believe all tihis [sic].


Gold, pure gold. ;)
#3 Sep 05 2008 at 2:28 PM Rating: Good
36 posts
Dammit! time to put those str gems back on the AH :) Math makes my head explode. It's pretty funny...was reading earlier today. Helped pass the time at work.
#4 Sep 05 2008 at 4:31 PM Rating: Decent
*
97 posts
On page 23, the original poster explained . . .

Quote:
Quote:
Why are people taking this troll seriously?

Though it makes me laugh that this came about due to my post.


I want all stupid people to die.

Part of the reason I made a thread to get them to gem strength in the first place


Awesome.
#5 Sep 05 2008 at 8:39 PM Rating: Decent
Whaaaa.... Brain... Slowly melting. I can NOT believe you sifted through Page after Page of that uninteligent, self absorbed, trolling dribble Theo. I could barely tolerate the two pages you have recomended (though amusing). Nothing like the good 'ole O board to quickly knock your faith in humanity down a few pegs. I better quickly run down to my local library in hopes of regaining any shred of inteligence I just lost (and at that I better find a dictionary because my spelling wasn't good to begin with).
To save a few people some pain here is the math Theo was talking about (youll have to read more to understand the other stuff)
(this equation is suposed to solve for ... back stab...)
In a nut shell :
{2*[(Crit+ Str^Agility-log8Resil - Res/3940)*2 - (Crit+Str^(Agility+Str/(1-Str))^1.3log8 - Res/3940)^2]*[(Crit+ Str*Agi/(Str^Agi) - Res/3940)*2 - (Crit+Str^Agility-log8Resil - Res/3940)^2] - [(Crit+.15 - Res/3940)*2 - (Crit+ (Crit+Str^(Agility+Str/(1-Str))^1.3log8 - Res/3940)^2]^2}

Why do I have the sneaking suspicion that a good number of readers actualy belived this... now I'm tempted to work this out so see what comes up.
#6 Sep 05 2008 at 9:09 PM Rating: Default
*****
13,048 posts
As soon as a saw a logarithmic function, I knew it was ********* Math in this game isn't that complicated.

Then again, I may or may not have been on the inside of the troll attempt, so... Smiley: tongue
#7 Sep 06 2008 at 2:58 AM Rating: Decent
How many were taken in and how many were just playing along?

It's pretty transparent.
#8 Sep 06 2008 at 1:15 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,594 posts
And... it's post capped.

It jumps right out in your face with "OMG CONSPIRACY". Apparently everyone who has ever done math on AP values is wrong..

Why does nobody notice that and just ignore it right away?



Edit: So I thought "What happens when I try to math that out?" Right away it goes Str^Agi. Some number*10^533. Yeah. And that's a 63 rogue. It takes 5 seconds to know it's a troll thread, but people just go for it.

Edited, Sep 6th 2008 5:25pm by Ehcks
#9 Sep 06 2008 at 1:57 PM Rating: Default
*****
13,048 posts
It should have been readily apparent when Mat didn't have Str socketed in his armory gear. He's such a theorycrafter that he'd change his gear just based on math, not based on experience or anything like that.
#10 Sep 06 2008 at 2:04 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,594 posts
I'm not Armory-ing someone who says that a 10 Str gem is better for a rogue than a 10 Agi or 10 AP, 5 crit, when it's based on a formula that involves scientific notation and octal logarithms..
#11 Sep 06 2008 at 6:49 PM Rating: Decent
Cursed double post.

Edited, Sep 6th 2008 10:55pm by areeuh
#12 Sep 06 2008 at 6:59 PM Rating: Decent
I tried punching the math equation (and a few other) into my calculator (TI-84) First I got an overflow error... than I got some other error (syntax I think) and on one equation I recived a domain error. I'm not about to hand do this to find out what it comes out to. Overflow FTW

(used crit as 25 Resil as 300 Str as 500 and Agi as 700 in case any one has a something that can work this out better than I.)
#13 Sep 06 2008 at 7:49 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
6,129 posts
I DID IT ON MY TI 83 AND IT MAKES SENSE
____________________________
Alla's Arena/PVP Forum

SO I PLAY WoW COOL EH!?

Let that beat build.

Xbox Live: kyNsdub
#14 Sep 08 2008 at 1:57 PM Rating: Good
***
1,006 posts
Heh TI 83's...brings back memories of playing space invaders during Trig class.

LEVEL 62 SHAMAN
I WIN THE TRIPLE XP RACE TO 60.
BOOM.
#15 Sep 08 2008 at 1:59 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
6,129 posts
MAYBEEE


I haven't been leveling the past 3 days since we hit 59, due to leveling up mining/engi.



I COULDA BEAT YOU
____________________________
Alla's Arena/PVP Forum

SO I PLAY WoW COOL EH!?

Let that beat build.

Xbox Live: kyNsdub
#16 Sep 10 2008 at 1:05 PM Rating: Good
**
513 posts
WoW, just WoW

that is priceless. Just like the one on Skullcrusher the other day with a "crit" spec'd mage. Blizz had to step in and delete though.
#17 Sep 10 2008 at 6:11 PM Rating: Decent
Xenexia wrote:
WoW, just WoW

that is priceless. Just like the one on Skullcrusher the other day with a "crit" spec'd mage. Blizz had to step in and delete though.


Is that the guy who was specced 61/0/0 without Arcane Power?
#18 Sep 12 2008 at 10:53 AM Rating: Good
**
513 posts
^ yes it was. The vultures really got out of hand there. It was sad to see the depths to which humans behind a monitor can stoop too.

Out of the 1500 posts or so, there was maybe 5 pieces of good advice, the rest was flame fest, private conversation, or meaningless trash. Posting the vent conversation was low. About on par with our political campaigners right now.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 171 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (171)