Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

20/0/41 shadowstep build; viable for raiding as RDPS buff?Follow

#1 Aug 23 2008 at 10:10 AM Rating: Default
**
842 posts
i am referring to this build in Theo's FAQ.

i have been looking for a build that incorporates 2/2 imp. EA as well as Hemo for the raid debuffs that both talents offer. please point me in the right direction if the viability (or lack thereof) of this build for increased RDPS has been discussed elsewhere. the question came up since we sometimes bring three rogues in a raid and only one of them is consistently in the top 5 (usually in the top 3 or #1 depending on the amount of AoE used by locks/mages) of total damage done and breaking 1000-1300 personal dps in mid-T5 content (3.5/6 SSC 1.5/4 TK).

i'm up to here in warrior fury and arms theorycraft as well as shaman enhancement and resto theorycraft, so someone pressing the easy button for me would be much appreciated =D
#2 Aug 23 2008 at 11:11 AM Rating: Decent
**
920 posts
You could raid as ShS, but you will be greatly gimping your raid because of the lack of dps. The ever so popular 20/41/0 Combat sword is THE best raid dps spec, and should always be used unless you are just going to do a BoJ run in kara and are WAY overgeared for it and have been doing pvp.
____________________________
It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer. -Albert Einstein

Feyras, ****** Superhero wrote:
I think I'm going to sig myself, just to be different.


PSN tag: DavidChrist. If you add me, send me a message telling me who you are, please.
#3 Aug 23 2008 at 11:28 AM Rating: Default
**
842 posts
ok then, perhaps the better question to ask is:

is there a way to incorporate 2/2 imp. EA and Hemo into a build without gimping personal (and thus raid) dps too much? or is the Hemo debuff not worth speccing into to buff RDPS?

i'm aware that you could still spec into 2/2 imp. EA as 20/41 combat. the rotation would just be lacking full 5pt. ruptures and focus on keeping imp. EA up.
#4 Aug 23 2008 at 11:44 AM Rating: Decent
**
591 posts
hemo currently isn't worth the personal dps loss since the nerf in 2.3. Somewhere in the -15% range for shst builds and somewhere in the 10% range for trispec builds(which is pretty close to the hemo buff dam). However if you still wanted to try a build like that you'd want to do trispec swords build(with EA) to minimize your personal dps loss. Rotation would most likely be 5s/5ea/4-5r.
#5 Aug 23 2008 at 11:48 AM Rating: Good
*
82 posts
No warriors to put sunders up in the raid?

Just based on SS numbers, 5 pt Imp EA is an increase of 60 dps per rogue (minus an unknown amount for the rogue applying Imp Ea) over 5 sunders. Also you need to consider more personal dps on the rogue's behalf for 2 talents points being taken from your poisons talent.

As for hemo, I cant comment on it as I've never personally ran with a hemo build to see what kind of personal dps gain it garners, nor have i seen a SS with the buff options.
#6 Aug 23 2008 at 1:03 PM Rating: Default
**
842 posts
Contalyst wrote:
No warriors to put sunders up in the raid?


i'm not sure what you mean by this. yes, we do have warriors as main tanks most of the time. the sole exception so far has been a druid tank on morogrim. however, 5pt. imp EA is worth 3075 armor reduction, and 5x sunder armor is worth 2600 armor reduction.
#7 Aug 23 2008 at 1:49 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,550 posts
Imp. EA overwrites Sunder and prevents warriors from using it for threat.

So...not the best idea.
#8 Aug 23 2008 at 3:58 PM Rating: Decent
*
128 posts
The amount of DPS loss you sustain with SHS is far superior than what you adding, a few hundred less armor (compared to sunders). So no, dont use EA if there is a warrior there.

As for your hemo question, i dont know the theocrafty to say what the dps change would be, but go combat/sub not to SHS
#9 Aug 23 2008 at 8:09 PM Rating: Good
***
2,550 posts
Hemo fails without deep subtlety. In a raid you should never be using Hemo unless your subtlety for some special reason. Only one I can think of might be for helping on adds on Vashj. And even then know
#10 Aug 24 2008 at 7:00 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
GodOfMoo wrote:
Imp. EA overwrites Sunder and prevents warriors from using it for threat.

So...not the best idea.


QFT.

#11 Aug 24 2008 at 11:11 AM Rating: Decent
**
755 posts
If you're running a War/Enh Shammy/3 rogue group in a 25 man, having one rogue spec Imp EA is a net Rdps gain, however, assuming your Warrior tank can live with the loss of 100 tps.
#12 Aug 24 2008 at 12:06 PM Rating: Default
**
842 posts
The One and Only Eschatologist wrote:
If you're running a War/Enh Shammy/3 rogue group in a 25 man, having one rogue spec Imp EA is a net Rdps gain, however, assuming your Warrior tank can live with the loss of 100 tps.


i've seen the maths on this left and right at EJ, 100 tps would be an extreme estimate. it has been shown to be closer to 50-80 tps loss.

speccing just into imp EA with an otherwise cookiecutter combat swords build is a definite RDPS gain for anyone wondering. i've run our top rogue, myself and some of our top hunters through their respective dps spreadsheets and the net RDPS gain from using imp EA far, far outweighed the dps lost from not keeping a 5pt. rupture up... and this is with that rogue specced into imp EA. i imagine that a lesser rogue wouldn't lose quite as much personal dps and thus lead to a somewhat larger RDPS gain.
#13 Aug 25 2008 at 1:29 AM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
You would not be speccing 20/0/41 to get Imp EA, you'd be speccing 20/41/0. You're a ******* moron if you spec sub for raiding.
#14 Aug 25 2008 at 7:07 AM Rating: Good
**
811 posts
Maybe you should make a sticky that describes the best builds for max dps in raiding. That way people could ignore it and make redundant threads about max dps for raiding.

#15 Aug 25 2008 at 12:18 PM Rating: Default
**
842 posts
if ^ refers to me, please pay attention to the bolded part:

fromanthebarbarian wrote:
ok then, perhaps the better question to ask is:

is there a way to incorporate 2/2 imp. EA and Hemo into a build without gimping personal (and thus raid) dps too much? or is the Hemo debuff not worth speccing into to buff RDPS?

i'm aware that you could still spec into 2/2 imp. EA as 20/41 combat. the rotation would just be lacking full 5pt. ruptures and focus on keeping imp. EA up.


also, the rogue faq lists PvE builds that incorporate combat swords or mutilate, and PvP builds. there's nothing there about the best build to buff raid dps. but i suppose buffing raid dps is not something you rogues are used to =P
#16 Aug 25 2008 at 1:18 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,680 posts
I've tried running a raid-buff tri-spec (with both a warrior and druid tank) a few times with marginal results. After 2 Kara runs my 10-toon group's overall rDPS was hardly effected (both positively and negatively) compared to when I ran as regular combat and, oddly, on boss fights there was a consistent net loss of dps. Which, honestly, I can't explain. Could be that the debuffs would tend to shine more so on longer fights than available in Kara, but I'm not willing to respec just for Fel Reaver. I didn't do a detailed analysis (just Recount results) nor did I try Imp EA with deep Combat; but in my small experiment it just didn't seem worth it to me.

There have also been Hemo rogues in a few of my 25-toon raids. But I don't recall there being a huge difference in net rDPS over an entire run. By comparison, I do notice the difference when my Fri/Sat group has a Retadin. Again, no detailed analysis, just adding the experience of a number-obsessed raider who runs Recount.

I do plan on trying some new spec variations (with WWS records) when my 10-toon group attacks WotLK. But until then, or I see some very compelling evidence, Imp EA and Hemo just doesn't seem worth it from what I've seen. Kinda a bummer honestly, but /shrug.
#17 Aug 25 2008 at 1:18 PM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
fromanthebarbarian wrote:
if ^ refers to me, please pay attention to the bolded part:

fromanthebarbarian wrote:
ok then, perhaps the better question to ask is:

is there a way to incorporate 2/2 imp. EA and Hemo into a build without gimping personal (and thus raid) dps too much? or is the Hemo debuff not worth speccing into to buff RDPS?

i'm aware that you could still spec into 2/2 imp. EA as 20/41 combat. the rotation would just be lacking full 5pt. ruptures and focus on keeping imp. EA up.


also, the rogue faq lists PvE builds that incorporate combat swords or mutilate, and PvP builds. there's nothing there about the best build to buff raid dps. but i suppose buffing raid dps is not something you rogues are used to =P

The only possible way that you can buff RDPS is via taking Imp EA instead of 2 points in Vile Poisons.

You're a moron if you can't figure that out.

Sub has never and will never be raid viable for any content that you need to min/max in.
#18 Aug 25 2008 at 1:25 PM Rating: Decent
Apart from KJ.
#19 Aug 25 2008 at 2:52 PM Rating: Default
**
842 posts
Overlord Theophany wrote:
fromanthebarbarian wrote:
if ^ refers to me, please pay attention to the bolded part:

fromanthebarbarian wrote:
ok then, perhaps the better question to ask is:

is there a way to incorporate 2/2 imp. EA and Hemo into a build without gimping personal (and thus raid) dps too much? or is the Hemo debuff not worth speccing into to buff RDPS?

i'm aware that you could still spec into 2/2 imp. EA as 20/41 combat. the rotation would just be lacking full 5pt. ruptures and focus on keeping imp. EA up.


also, the rogue faq lists PvE builds that incorporate combat swords or mutilate, and PvP builds. there's nothing there about the best build to buff raid dps. but i suppose buffing raid dps is not something you rogues are used to =P

The only possible way that you can buff RDPS is via taking Imp EA instead of 2 points in Vile Poisons.

You're a moron if you can't figure that out.

Sub has never and will never be raid viable for any content that you need to min/max in.


right, excuse me for not knowing how much dps your poisons are worth, my highest level rogue is 12 hence why i posted here to glean knowledge at your feet. i also didn't know how much win/fail hemo is wrt dps net gain. thanks for answering the questions.

the next time a rogue with a warrior alt asks which fury talent he can take points out of to fill out 2/2 imp execute, i'll make sure to tell him he's a moron if he can't figure out to take them out of precision.

btw when i'm done wading through arms/fury/enhancement/resto theorycraft, i'll have to start going through holy priest theorycraft, so my apologies but it seems i can't start getting into rogue theorycraft anytime soon.

Edited, Aug 25th 2008 7:18pm by fromanthebarbarian
#20 Aug 25 2008 at 2:56 PM Rating: Good
**
608 posts
Kavekk wrote:
Apart from KJ.


YES, please tell me, what is the sub rogue's role against KJ ... we saw SK use one on their kill, then we saw Method and Nihilum use one on THEIR kills.

Lots of questions were asked at the time about the reason for it, I just never saw an answer. I don't raid, will never raid, and aren't invloved in any end-game content ... I just find it interesting that out-of-the-blue, this sub rogue appeared on the end boss of the game for the world first kill of KJ, and has pretty much been a standard fixture in the general makeup of any raid that has dropped him since.
#21 Aug 25 2008 at 5:00 PM Rating: Default
*****
13,048 posts
There is no point on KJ. It may be for Cheat Death, but that's a massive loss of DPS they're taking by using a hemo rogue.

There's really no reason to spec for hemo on KJ. SK's rogue even came out and said that he wouldn't normally spec hemo against KJ.
#22 Aug 25 2008 at 5:06 PM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
fromanthebarbarian wrote:
Overlord Theophany wrote:
fromanthebarbarian wrote:
if ^ refers to me, please pay attention to the bolded part:

fromanthebarbarian wrote:
ok then, perhaps the better question to ask is:

is there a way to incorporate 2/2 imp. EA and Hemo into a build without gimping personal (and thus raid) dps too much? or is the Hemo debuff not worth speccing into to buff RDPS?

i'm aware that you could still spec into 2/2 imp. EA as 20/41 combat. the rotation would just be lacking full 5pt. ruptures and focus on keeping imp. EA up.


also, the rogue faq lists PvE builds that incorporate combat swords or mutilate, and PvP builds. there's nothing there about the best build to buff raid dps. but i suppose buffing raid dps is not something you rogues are used to =P

The only possible way that you can buff RDPS is via taking Imp EA instead of 2 points in Vile Poisons.

You're a moron if you can't figure that out.

Sub has never and will never be raid viable for any content that you need to min/max in.


right, excuse me for not knowing how much dps your poisons are worth, my highest level rogue is 12 hence why i posted here to glean knowledge at your feet. i also didn't know how much win/fail hemo is wrt dps net gain. thanks for answering the questions.

the next time a rogue with a warrior alt asks which fury talent he can take points out of to fill out 2/2 imp execute, i'll make sure to tell him he's a moron if he can't figure out to take them out of precision.

btw when i'm done wading through arms/fury/enhancement/resto theorycraft, i'll have to start going through holy priest theorycraft, so my apologies but it seems i can't start getting into rogue theorycraft anytime soon.

Yeah, sorry, I forgot that I said that the best build was combat swords in the FAQ.

I also forgot that I know next to everything about rogue DPS, and therefore am fully qualified to answer questions on the subject.

Rogue basic theorycraft like you're talking about in this thread isn't hard to figure out, which is why I'm calling you a moron.

Is hemo enough of a RDPS buff to justify all the points you'd have to lose in combat? Hah, no.

Can you find out this info by simply downloading a spreadsheet and playing with it for 20 minutes?

Yes, definitely.
#23 Aug 25 2008 at 5:28 PM Rating: Decent
robertlofthouse wrote:
Kavekk wrote:
Apart from KJ.


YES, please tell me, what is the sub rogue's role against KJ ... we saw SK use one on their kill, then we saw Method and Nihilum use one on THEIR kills.

Lots of questions were asked at the time about the reason for it, I just never saw an answer. I don't raid, will never raid, and aren't invloved in any end-game content ... I just find it interesting that out-of-the-blue, this sub rogue appeared on the end boss of the game for the world first kill of KJ, and has pretty much been a standard fixture in the general makeup of any raid that has dropped him since.


Basically, there's a point where KJ does a large amount of AE damage. Everyone gets into a shield set up by a player (turned intoa dragon by an orb). Anyway, one player has to be out of this shield killing ****, so they specced him CD.
#24 Aug 25 2008 at 10:57 PM Rating: Good
**
608 posts
Kavekk wrote:

Basically, there's a point where KJ does a large amount of AE damage. Everyone gets into a shield set up by a player (turned intoa dragon by an orb). Anyway, one player has to be out of this shield killing sh*t, so they specced him CD.


Awesome, thanks. You see, this is where I seriously admire those top guilds going for world firsts (or at least going for world firsts). How long / quick did it take for the raid leader(s) to determine that the best way of handling that situation is to have a specific class, spec a specific way.

Maybe it's not really as impressive as it sounds (again, not being a raider, I have no idea), but for me, it sure as hell is impressive.

Anyway, OT ... soz.

Edited, Aug 26th 2008 8:59am by robertlofthouse
#25 Aug 26 2008 at 11:24 AM Rating: Default
*
80 posts
To the OP, don't worry about Theo calling you a moron, that's all he can say. He is unable to answer a question without telling how good he think he is and how stupid others are. He claims he knows everything about rogue but all he can say is check spreadsheet ... so in reality, Theo doesn't know sh*t, spreadsheed knows everything.

Just ignore him and listen to other people who knows how to answer a question without calling everyone a moron.
#26 Aug 26 2008 at 11:49 AM Rating: Good
***
1,039 posts
get out of sub.

theo is right, check a spreadsheet.
to the guy who posted before me, its simple to check the spreadsheet and find these things for yourself. if the OP doesnt understand how dps works maybe he doesnt deserve to get bashed, but its clearly stated that combat is the only way to go for raiding.


Edited, Aug 26th 2008 2:46pm by EnthalpyTheBurninator

Edited, Aug 26th 2008 2:48pm by EnthalpyTheBurninator

Edited, Aug 26th 2008 2:48pm by EnthalpyTheBurninator
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 313 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (313)