I'm a fan of Zerker stance. But then I'm deep fury. I use Zerker stance all the time.
To quote here...
Quote:
Berserker Stance is your 'offensive' stance, with a 10% increase in damage received and a 3% increase to your critical strike chance. Unlike Defensive Stance, as you may have noticed, the modifiers are not equal - you'll receive more damage, but the increase in output from the Stance alone won't alone compensate for the increased damage input. However, Berserker Stance has some of the Warrior’s best abilities - Berserker Rage and Whirlwind.
You get 10% increase to damage received BUT...
You get 10% increase of damage suffered, which equates to more rage, so more DPS.
You get Zerker Rage. Which equates more rage out of the more damage, so more dps, and anti-fear.
You get Pummel, so from caster mobs you may end up taking LESS damage than in battle stance.
You get intercept, which has a long stun, stun equates to dealing damage while not taking it. Stun also means no dodging so it means more DPS while not taking any.
And the 3% extra crit means 3% crit + 3% to trigger Flurry.
I only use Battle Stance for specific things like Mocking Blow when tanking, charge when in PvP... on rare occasions when I am tanking and I have to hamstring because it's a PUG FROM HELL and the rogue wanted the dps poison instead of the anti-flee poison while the mage turned out to be a fire mage that doesn't have a button for frostbolt and the warlock didn't want to use recklessness because his curse of agony "crits so awesome"... and that's it.
Defensive for tanking, or when I'm DPSing I use it for quickly taunting stuff off of the healer, throw in a few sunders and continue to kill order. I find it's preferable to have it attacking me until the tank gets it than attacking the healer until the tank gets it (Besides, gives me an insane rage input and that gives me LOTS MOAR PEW PEW).
Edited, Aug 23rd 2008 9:24pm by xorq Edited, Aug 23rd 2008 9:25pm by xorq