Quote:
OMFG are you that retarded?
I'm not, are you? Just shut up and stop blindly posting "hey look I'm doing the widely accepted as the best thing so it MUST be the best" comments. Now read closely what follows after your next quote;
Quote:
MOST YOUR YOUR DAMAGE COMES FROM AUTO (WHITE) ATTACKS. That's why the following are more important than crit: SnD, Haste, precision, +hit, etc.
Yes. IF YOU ARE COMBAT SWORDS, MOST OF YOUR DAMAGE COMES FROM WHITE ATTACKS. But hey, guess what? The *idea* of this whole thread is finding out WHY combat swords is apperantly so much better than everything else. If you are for example heavily crit based; OH MY GOD! Most of your damage actually comes from skills!
Thrashtalking me when I get something wrong is annoying but one thing. Trashtalking me because yóu don't understand what I'm on about is over my limit.
Quote:
So read the stickies, read Theos posts, read elitists jerks if you have to.
One step ahead of you. That's what I've been doing and exactly the reason I made this thread.
Quote:
Learn your cycles, gem your sh*t right, and stop posting this garbage.
I think you might want to rephrase that.
Quote:
On another note, anyone else notice that the entire Rogue forums seem to be taking after Theo lately?
I have. I respect Theo... Even though I met him with him being an ***, he knows his ****. And that's also somewhat what I want to say with my post; if he (and the 'combat swords ftw' idea with him) are right, give me some proof. As of now the only proof I have that the whole general idea of raiding (get hit cap, stack expertise, go combat swords) is correct are damagemeters. But I want to know for sure whý it is impossible to have for example a subtlety based build with enough +crit and +crit damage to do at least reasonable damage in a raid.