Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

oh you guys will *love* thisFollow

#52 Jul 28 2008 at 7:13 AM Rating: Default
*
233 posts
I too have never had any experience with or against a multi-boxer, but I cannot see the problem with them.

If you play in AV for instance you could get a group of 5 players to team up and they would (in all likelihood) very quickly kill any single people they were up against. Yes it may take a few more miliseconds to communicate that fact between themselves, but they too would beat any single opponents. This is certainly not against the rules, and no-one has any problems with it.

Multiboxing is simply an extension of this. In BGS they are taking 5 players spaces. Instead of having 5 separate players there is a multi-boxing team. There is an advantage in the ease of team targeting and no communication downtime. To this there is the disadvantage: they can easily be CC'd, 4 of their team will not react to a threat if it is near them (e.g. the whoosh of a stealthed rogue) and if they get separated or all end up facing different ways (through fear or polymorph for example) they are virtually useless.

The same goes for arena. A multi-box team is taking spaces that could be filled with people. Actual physical thinking, reacting, deciding-things-for-themselves people. The MB may have 2, 3 or 4 followers, but once again they can't react themselves, can't adapt to a situation and can't work to re-group themselves, and so I think that in the arena this will never make them all-conquoring.

I would personally love to take on a MB team. The hard thing (to me at least) is reacting to 2, 3 or 5 different personalities. The MB team may instantly kill one or two members, but by that time my remaining team members would have feared, CC'd and disrupted them, and I don't think a team of zombies would eventually stand a chance.

#53 Jul 28 2008 at 9:59 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
KradortheDruid wrote:
I too have never had any experience with or against a multi-boxer...

That's exactly why you can't see the problem with them.
#54 Jul 28 2008 at 2:33 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,121 posts
Ele shaman is a strong class to multi box. Here is the thing half the multi boxers I have seen suck, but a good multi boxer with good macros can kick some great ***. Combined with totems, heals, and heavy burst damage... there is a reason elemental shaman is the only really serious class players multi box.

I am sure they can be beat, but not sure what kind of group it would take, but I wouldn't underestimate what a group like this could do.
#55 Jul 28 2008 at 8:58 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,245 posts
4 EM+CLs from 1 player over four toons is equally as powerful as 4 EM+CLs from 4 players over four toons.

When you argue specifics, the argument becomes void, because then you are complaining about the possibility that a 5-man Arena team can destroy a member of the other team and seriously damage others in the first couple seconds. And your argument is not about multiboxing but about Elemental Mastery and Chain Lightning. A 5-man arena team of real players of Elemental Shamans can pretty easily coordinate their very first attacks to all be on the healer or whoever so that they're bursted down. It's not different in that aspect.

The difference in opinion here should lie in the ease or difficulty, and, perhaps consequently, the cheapness or validity of multiboxing. I personally find it fine, I've been on the receiving end of it and thought it was pretty cool and an impressive display of power and management as opponents target specific ones that ***** up the synchronization after the initial bursts. But I can see how people can find it cheap, because it potentially allows more coordination than individual players as partners and is one player with several times his character's power under the actions of one.
#56 Jul 30 2008 at 2:18 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,717 posts
Give up Mental, reason doesn't work with them. It's cheating if they can't beat you.
#57 Jul 30 2008 at 5:33 PM Rating: Default
**
947 posts
You forget, Mental doesnt box.

And even if he did, beating him would be simplicity itself, he said so.
#58 Jul 31 2008 at 9:30 AM Rating: Good
***
2,634 posts
There is a multiboxer on my server who uses shamans, and they really irritate me. Not be cause I have played against them, but they stole my name! :)

This dude stands in the middle of org with his 5 shamans named ____storm. I was the first shaman to do it, thanks for stealing my gig, and now i get messages constantly... Are you a part of this 5 man standing in ORG? or people that know me, DUDE did you see this 5 man in org? For the love of god! :)

I will never understand the joy this guy has doing this, and why he spends so much a month to pay for these accounts. But even with half butted gear on them, his team, last time I saw him was at 1900 rating.

Not bad at all, and I imagine, everyone on my server/battlegroup wants to shoot this guy in the head! :)

#59 Jul 31 2008 at 10:27 AM Rating: Good
*****
19,369 posts
Sinstralis wrote:
You forget, Mental doesnt box.

And even if he did, beating him would be simplicity itself, he said so.


I'm boxing this argument now. One of these anti-boxing socks belongs to me.
#60 Aug 06 2008 at 11:40 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,594 posts
I can't see it as anything but outright cheating until some guy posts a video of more than one computer with their own keyboards and mice set up around his chair, and he's controlling each character separately..
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 155 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (155)