Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

I <3 MutilateFollow

#77 Jul 04 2008 at 3:04 AM Rating: Good
**
608 posts
bismarckmajivo wrote:
robertlofthouse wrote:
You said I should use CS > Mut as an opener, I said ok - good idea - I'll try and use it as an opener, then you said it's not a good idea as an opener ... unless following CS (at which stage, I admit, I got a headache .. who's ignoring whom at this stage).


You said you'd try using Mut as an opener. To me, an opener is your very first attack. Otherwise you're not really opening with it - you already used something else to prime your target.


I responded Directly to your comment about opening with CS > Mut, saying I had never thought about using Mut as an opener, and I would try that. Sorry if I confused you with my wording, I sorta assumed you knew what I was talking about when responding to a comment you made.

bismarckmajivo wrote:
Other parts of my post were directed towards the thread as a whole, not to you. Hence my annoyance with people taking everything personally these days.


Seems like you're taking this way more personally than you think I am .. I don't believe I mentioned you comments after my first response ... Hmmmm ?

#78 Jul 04 2008 at 9:55 AM Rating: Default
****
4,684 posts
Quote:
If you think that a Combat Rogue is like a Gimped Warrior ... then I suggest you either investigate either the Skills / Talents of both, the mechanics of both, the itemisation available to both, or better yet, go and play both ... then come back and make the same statement.

And erm, are you saying you never use in stealth abilities when playing a combat rogue (CS ??). Or are you saying that as a non-combat rogue, you can use in-stealth abilities to DPS ... neither comment makes any sense to me whatsoever.


I won't pretend I've got years of experience playing combat, but yeah, I've tried it. The "stability" it gives bores me since most fights are basically a hit points race since I'm not killable and I need to very slowly but steadily take my enemy down. That's what I love about subtlety. The odd bursts, constant running around/action and mobility (trough ShS) are what make me feel that I'm playing a rogue. Not just a random guy with a sword doing nothing but melee attacks.
#79 Jul 04 2008 at 11:08 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,159 posts
robertlofthouse wrote:
bismarckmajivo wrote:
Other parts of my post were directed towards the thread as a whole, not to you. Hence my annoyance with people taking everything personally these days.


Seems like you're taking this way more personally than you think I am .. I don't believe I mentioned you comments after my first response ... Hmmmm ?


You made a comment about my comment. I responded. You responded to that. Unsurprisingly, I answered again. Maybe you're new here, but this is how forums work.
#80 Jul 04 2008 at 8:08 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
bismarckmajivo wrote:
robertlofthouse wrote:
bismarckmajivo wrote:
Other parts of my post were directed towards the thread as a whole, not to you. Hence my annoyance with people taking everything personally these days.


Seems like you're taking this way more personally than you think I am .. I don't believe I mentioned you comments after my first response ... Hmmmm ?


You made a comment about my comment. I responded. You responded to that. Unsurprisingly, I answered again. Maybe you're new here, but this is how forums work.


Roflpwnt.

edit: failquote.

Edited, Jul 5th 2008 12:08am by zepoodle
#81 Jul 04 2008 at 11:06 PM Rating: Good
**
608 posts
bismarckmajivo wrote:
robertlofthouse wrote:
bismarckmajivo wrote:
Other parts of my post were directed towards the thread as a whole, not to you. Hence my annoyance with people taking everything personally these days.


Seems like you're taking this way more personally than you think I am .. I don't believe I mentioned you comments after my first response ... Hmmmm ?


You made a comment about my comment. I responded. You responded to that. Unsurprisingly, I answered again. Maybe you're new here, but this is how forums work.


Wow, way to go to take the conversation off track and grab some limelight with your boundless verbosity (only not). You were the one getting iffy about me responding to you ... not the other way around.

Regardless, I'm bored with this topic anyway, so go ahead and insert some other inane comment here as your last word if you will.
#82 Jul 04 2008 at 11:52 PM Rating: Default
*****
13,048 posts
Mozared wrote:
Quote:
If you think that a Combat Rogue is like a Gimped Warrior ... then I suggest you either investigate either the Skills / Talents of both, the mechanics of both, the itemisation available to both, or better yet, go and play both ... then come back and make the same statement.

And erm, are you saying you never use in stealth abilities when playing a combat rogue (CS ??). Or are you saying that as a non-combat rogue, you can use in-stealth abilities to DPS ... neither comment makes any sense to me whatsoever.


I won't pretend I've got years of experience playing combat, but yeah, I've tried it. The "stability" it gives bores me since most fights are basically a hit points race since I'm not killable and I need to very slowly but steadily take my enemy down. That's what I love about subtlety. The odd bursts, constant running around/action and mobility (trough ShS) are what make me feel that I'm playing a rogue. Not just a random guy with a sword doing nothing but melee attacks.

You're a bad rogue.
#83 Jul 05 2008 at 4:06 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
robertlofthouse wrote:
Wow, way to go to take the conversation off track and grab some limelight with your boundless verbosity (only not). You were the one getting iffy about me responding to you ... not the other way around.

Regardless, I'm bored with this topic anyway, so go ahead and insert some other inane comment here as your last word if you will.


This is what people who lose debates say when they lose debates.

"You're stupid and your point is stupid, but I'm too bored to explain why this is, so I'll pretend I'm not paying attention any more."

Quote:
Not just a random guy with a sword doing nothing but melee attacks.


You do know that virtually all our attacks are melee, right? It's...all we do, really. Other than Deadly Throw and that.
#84 Jul 05 2008 at 6:37 AM Rating: Good
**
608 posts
zepoodle wrote:
robertlofthouse wrote:
Wow, way to go to take the conversation off track and grab some limelight with your boundless verbosity (only not). You were the one getting iffy about me responding to you ... not the other way around.

Regardless, I'm bored with this topic anyway, so go ahead and insert some other inane comment here as your last word if you will.


This is what people who lose debates say when they lose debates.

"You're stupid and your point is stupid, but I'm too bored to explain why this is, so I'll pretend I'm not paying attention any more."


;-) ... you just made it interesting again ...

After stating that I hadn't even referenced his "personal" comment past my initial response ... bismarckmajivo responds with something left field :

bismarckmajivo wrote:

You made a comment about my comment. I responded. You responded to that. Unsurprisingly, I answered again. Maybe you're new here, but this is how forums work.


Which has nothing to add regarding the "debate" as you put it, and effectively ended any valid contributions he may or may not have been able to add, hence me becoming bored with the "Debate".

Here's my standpoint, I don't like Mutilate, I don't like the fact that it's a dagger skill, I don't like that it uses so much energy, I don't like the fact that I must be behind the mobs to use it. That is a standpoint which I have reflected here exhaustively, and STILL, I'm told that I'm not explaining myself.

The thing is, You're going to have people who like Dagger style play, and people who like Sword Style Play. I like swords, a certain minority like daggers. Fact - swords perform better for sustained overall DPS.

So what are we discussing here, whether (1)Mutilate is as good as sword skills, or whether (2)Mutilate is nicer to play than swords. If (1), asked and answered. If (2) .. you'll never get agreement, only Points of View.

So if YOU think I've "lost the debate", good for you. I didn't realise it WAS a debate, merely an exchange of points of view.

Edited, Jul 5th 2008 4:39pm by robertlofthouse
#85 Jul 05 2008 at 7:21 AM Rating: Default
****
4,684 posts
Quote:
You're a bad rogue.


No, I'm not. And that's final. Go pester someone else if you insist on being an ***.
#86 Jul 05 2008 at 11:54 AM Rating: Good
***
2,550 posts
No if you aren't Combat in raids you are a bad Rogue.

The entire point of being a Rogue is that we do damage, alot of damage, more than basically any other class.

If you go into a raid as a spec that does less as optimal damage you are bad.

End of story.

Quote:
Yes, I am. And that's final.


FTFY

#87 Jul 05 2008 at 12:07 PM Rating: Default
*****
13,048 posts
Mozared wrote:
Quote:
You're a bad rogue.


No, I'm not. And that's final. Go pester someone else if you insist on being an ***.

Yes, you are.

Mozared wrote:
I won't pretend I've got years of experience playing combat, but yeah, I've tried it.

Post your armory so I can see that you've raided at all as combat swords.

If not, shut the **** up and sit down.
#88 Jul 05 2008 at 12:59 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,684 posts
Nothing to see for you on my amory. But ever heard about the PTR's?

Even if I were a bad rogue, I'm a better man. That matters more to me in the end. But let me inquire again; is there any good reason for you being an *******?
#89 Jul 05 2008 at 1:01 PM Rating: Good
***
2,550 posts
So...you have nothing to prove that you are right...so you resort to insults...
If you're gonna be on the rogue forums you really need thicker skin.

And since you said nothing to back up your claim of not being a bad rogue I'll assume you agree. So please shut up about Rogue matters until you know what you are doing.
#90 Jul 05 2008 at 1:06 PM Rating: Default
*****
13,048 posts
Mozared wrote:
Nothing to see for you on my amory. But ever heard about the PTR's?

Even if I were a bad rogue, I'm a better man. That matters more to me in the end. But let me inquire again; is there any good reason for you being an @#%^?

You've downed Illidan on the PTR?

Damn, you're good.

Oh, wait.

I'm an ******* because it attracts attention on this forum. All I have to do is not be wrong and people will listen to me.

Sad as you may think it is, people listen to me here because even though I'm an *******, I'm nearly always right.

You can check out what I've done for this forum though; we have what's most likely the most educated class forum on Allakhazam.

RPZip might make up for the warrior forum, but I doubt it. He knows more than I do, but the regulars in the warrior forum other than Quor don't know that much. Smiley: tongue
#91 Jul 05 2008 at 1:08 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,684 posts
I? ME? MOI? am resorting to insults? Would you please read trough... ALL of Theo's previous posts and dare say that again? There's maybe 2 in which he didn't insult me. There's a difference between 'having a thick skin' and basically just being an @#%^ for no reason. Remind me to yell insults at you if you ever comment about something that's my entirely field of play.

And I said nothing to back up my claim because Theo said nothing to back up his. He's wrong. You haven't seen me play nor do you know me in real-life.


Quote:
You've downed Illidan on the PTR?

Damn, you're good.


God, how surprising, I totally did not see that coming *rolls eyes*. I never said I've raided on the PTR's now did I? You're actually thinking you can only be good at this game I've you seen BT right?

Edited, Jul 5th 2008 11:09pm by Mozared
#92 Jul 05 2008 at 1:10 PM Rating: Default
*****
13,048 posts
Mozared wrote:
I? ME? MOI? am resorting to insults? Would you please read trough... ALL of Theo's previous posts and dare say that again? There's maybe 2 in which he didn't insult me. There's a difference between 'having a thick skin' and basically just being an @#%^ for no reason. Remind me to yell insults at you if you ever comment about something that's my entirely field of play.

And I said nothing to back up my claim because Theo said nothing to back up his. He's wrong. You haven't seen me play nor do you know me in real-life.

My armory and all of the threads I've posted on this forum are enough to back up what I've said.

Hai, me Rival, you bad. End.

Mozared wrote:
Quote:
You've downed Illidan on the PTR?

Damn, you're good.


God, how surprising, I totally did not see that coming *rolls eyes*. I never said I've raided on the PTR's now did I? You're actually thinking you can only be good at this game I've you seen BT right?

Edited, Jul 5th 2008 11:09pm by Mozared

99% of the good players in this game are either Rival and above in arena, or are in T6.

Which is it for you?

Edited, Jul 5th 2008 2:11pm by Theophany
#93 Jul 05 2008 at 1:12 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,684 posts
No, they're not. Everything I've said are stuff I've found true and if you would have actually seen me play you would realize that. Everything you've said is stuff you might've found true. But which isn't necissarily always true.

Sure, (yeahyeah, next to) all players that are doing hardcore end-game content are good. But that doesn't automatically mean all good players have to be doing hardcore end-game content.

Edited, Jul 5th 2008 11:14pm by Mozared
#94 Jul 05 2008 at 1:14 PM Rating: Good
***
2,550 posts
You continue to defend a point that has been proven wrong.

Combat Sword/Fists is the best DPS build for PvE. Mutilate is not.

End of Story. Thats all there is to it. So please shut the **** up.
#95 Jul 05 2008 at 1:15 PM Rating: Default
****
4,684 posts
Oh? Quote me, where did I say that?
#96 Jul 05 2008 at 4:18 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
99% of the good players in this game are either Rival and above in arena, or are in T6.

Which is it for you?


Allow me to offer an additional perspective to this point. What Theo said is a personal thing to me, seeing as how I started WoW at the start of my military career. If anyone in here knows anything about the military lifestyle, you will be aware that lots of extinuating circumstances arise frequently. As i type this, im sitting on a ship somewhere in Persian Sea area. I haven't played WoW for almost 5 months... for those few of us in the military, WoW is a welcome break from the **** we have to deal with on a day to day basis, so when i go on deployments, it depresses me because i can't play with my friends and family.

Though having a good rating and being in t6 speaks volumes for your skill, nothing - not even in WoW - is in black and white. I can't have a dedicated time to be raiding since my schedule is at the mercy of the government. And as far as arena goes, finding a good partner or 2 is very hard to find. And again, my schedule and infrequent play time prevents a lot of progression there. My nomadic lifestyle prevents me from gearing up as much as other players. But do I think I suck because I'm not rocking T6 or full venge or w/e? No I don't. I usually dont think players are great or suck unless i can see them play firsthand. Gear doesn't always tell the tale... but talent specs do as they are reflection on your knowledge and efficiency of your own class.

But I get kind of offended by comments that say you're not good unless you're rival or t6 geared. The ultimate say so is how that player plays. Though sticking to the OP- Mutilate is fun, decent at pvp, decent at pve but it is not optimum for either. It's plain as day... but in the end you pick which style you want to play. If you're not looking to soar to great heights in either pvp or pve, then mutilate is fine. If you're truly good, you can make anything be good.

"Im an artist. Get me a ******* tuba and I'll get you something out of it."-John Lennon.
#97 Jul 05 2008 at 4:25 PM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
RyphtheSwift wrote:
Quote:
99% of the good players in this game are either Rival and above in arena, or are in T6.

Which is it for you?

But I get kind of offended by comments that say you're not good unless you're rival or t6 geared. The ultimate say so is how that player plays.

I completely agree, but time played usually equates to being better at the game, and experience usually leads to better players.

I respect everyone equally regardless of arena ratings, but when people start commenting on how viable or optimal a build is, I tend to have to chime in.

Usually I emphasize one way or another, which either gets people's panties in a twist, or they end up loving me. I think in this case, a couple people got offended when I made it clear that daggers are sub-par.

They refused to let it go, which brought about me flaming people to try and get it through their heads that: "yes, daggers are worse than maces/swords for PvP, and swords for PvE, no matter what you might think based on your anecdotal evidence".

Don't take it personally, without seeing anyone play, I rely on progress and gearing to determine skill.
#98 Jul 05 2008 at 4:29 PM Rating: Good
****
4,684 posts
That's what I've been trying to say. I understand Theo's point of view in that topic around general chat, I don't like playing with complete idiots either. But Gear /=/ skill. Even if I prefer daggers above other weapons, that doesn't mean I'm without skill. If I was using no weapons at all, sure, then yell at me. Like somebody said in this topic earlier, you need to make a balance between keeping the game fun and being competent. As long as I can kill things, daggers are a fine balance for me.
#99 Jul 05 2008 at 8:45 PM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
Mozared wrote:
That's what I've been trying to say. I understand Theo's point of view in that topic around general chat, I don't like playing with complete idiots either. But Gear /=/ skill. Even if I prefer daggers above other weapons, that doesn't mean I'm without skill. If I was using no weapons at all, sure, then yell at me. Like somebody said in this topic earlier, you need to make a balance between keeping the game fun and being competent. As long as I can kill things, daggers are a fine balance for me.

Until it starts hurting your group.
#100 Jul 06 2008 at 2:59 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,159 posts
Mozared wrote:
That's what I've been trying to say. I understand Theo's point of view in that topic around general chat, I don't like playing with complete idiots either. But Gear /=/ skill. Even if I prefer daggers above other weapons, that doesn't mean I'm without skill. If I was using no weapons at all, sure, then yell at me. Like somebody said in this topic earlier, you need to make a balance between keeping the game fun and being competent. As long as I can kill things, daggers are a fine balance for me.


Look, there's not terribly much to this game. This late in the game we had spreadsheets to tell you what rotation to use, gear guides, talent guides, etc. - your job is not very complicated. One of the few vestiges of skill remaining is knowing how to gear, drawing the balance between this stat and that, and your weapon is the most important part of any gear set. Unfortunately, it's also the component that determines your playstyle almost completely.
#101 Jul 06 2008 at 6:44 AM Rating: Default
*
72 posts
What were we talking about again?

I forgot after post 300312525423.

I love you guys.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 8 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (8)