Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

I <3 MutilateFollow

#52 Jul 03 2008 at 2:11 PM Rating: Good
***
2,550 posts
Quote:

Oh yes there is, daggers are here for people who actually want to play a rogue, not a ninja wannabe-warrior.

Backstab all the way!


No, the only reason to be using Daggers is if you want people to know that you are a n00b. If I'm in a group with a Dagger using Rogue I ignore it, but if its in a raid I'm quite willing to tell them to get a ******* clue.

Combat Swords is only boring on fights like Morogrim, Anetheron, and Void Reaver where you stand behind the mob and spam your cycle.

Oh wait.

Guess what you do as Mutilate or Combat Daggers in those fights...

You stand behind the mob and spam your cycle. Boring as well.

And then when you get to a fight like Al'ar, Lurker, Hydross, Leo, and plenty of others your choice of being Daggers ***** you over. Good luck getting behind them for any reasonable amount of time.
#53 Jul 03 2008 at 2:16 PM Rating: Default
*****
13,048 posts
Al'ar, Lurker, and Leo (being that I haven't done Hydross) are non-issues with positioning. If you can't get behind your target, you're bad.

If you EVER hit a target from the front, you're a moron. One parry and your tank is taking substantially more damage.
#54 Jul 03 2008 at 2:38 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,684 posts
Quote:
No, the only reason to be using Daggers is if you want people to know that you are a n00b. If I'm in a group with a Dagger using Rogue I ignore it, but if its in a raid I'm quite willing to tell them to get a @#%^ing clue.


And ***** you too. I'll have my fun my own way, thank you. If you consider me a "n00b" for such an asshat reason I know that I'm the better man anyway.
#55 Jul 03 2008 at 2:43 PM Rating: Good
***
2,680 posts
Nobody's saying that it's not fun to play Muti... nobody can tell you how to have fun.

But if you're gimping your raid because you like seeing crits on your screen... well..... Those enrage timers don't care if you think Muti is ZOMGAWESME.
#56 Jul 03 2008 at 2:44 PM Rating: Default
*****
13,048 posts
Mozared wrote:
Quote:
No, the only reason to be using Daggers is if you want people to know that you are a n00b. If I'm in a group with a Dagger using Rogue I ignore it, but if its in a raid I'm quite willing to tell them to get a @#%^ing clue.


And ***** you too. I'll have my fun my own way, thank you. If you consider me a "n00b" for such an asshat reason I know that I'm the better man anyway.

Logic is here to save the day.

1) Daggers are not optimal.

2) All players that use non-optimal weapons are noobs.

3) You use daggers, ergo you are a noob.

Logic saves the day!
#57 Jul 03 2008 at 2:50 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,684 posts
Logic eh?

The time you spend theorycrafting is time not playing equals time not raiding equals time not getting loot equals not being optimal equals being a noob. It's pointless.

Sure, when you're past fun-zone Karazhan into the Black Temple start yelling at your rogues for having daggers. Earlier than that; if daggers works for them, why whine? Just because yóu like to look like a wannabe-ninja doesn't automatically make me a noob. I like being the odd man out, and in case you didn't know, most inventions have been made by nót doing the usual thing but finding a new way.
#58 Jul 03 2008 at 3:32 PM Rating: Default
*****
13,048 posts
Mozared wrote:
Logic eh?

The time you spend theorycrafting is time not playing equals time not raiding equals time not getting loot equals not being optimal equals being a noob. It's pointless.

Sure, when you're past fun-zone Karazhan into the Black Temple start yelling at your rogues for having daggers. Earlier than that; if daggers works for them, why whine? Just because yóu like to look like a wannabe-ninja doesn't automatically make me a noob. I like being the odd man out, and in case you didn't know, most inventions have been made by nót doing the usual thing but finding a new way.

No, the time I spend theorycrafting is when my arena teams aren't playing and when I'm not raiding BT (which I don't raid as of the beginning of S4).

Your logic fails, moron.
#59 Jul 03 2008 at 3:34 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,550 posts
Quote:
Sure, when you're past fun-zone Karazhan into the Black Temple start yelling at your rogues for having daggers. Earlier than that; if daggers works for them, why whine? Just because yóu like to look like a wannabe-ninja doesn't automatically make me a noob. I like being the odd man out, and in case you didn't know, most inventions have been made by nót doing the usual thing but finding a new way.


I'm sorry did you not notice this part of my post:

Quote:
If I'm in a group with a Dagger using Rogue I ignore it, but if its in a raid I'm quite willing to tell them to get a @#%^ing clue.


Let me reiterate that:

Quote:
but if its in a raid


I don't give a **** if you want to have fun, but I do care when you wanting to have fun comes at my expense, and the expense of the raid group.

Besides, Kara is easy-mode raiding. You don't need to be optimal for it.

You can have fun while raiding, but you need to strike a balance between fun, and being competant.

Quote:
And ***** you too. I'll have my fun my own way, thank you. If you consider me a "n00b" for such an asshat reason I know that I'm the better man anyway.


And thanks for responding childishly, if you have given a legit reason as to why Mutilate was worth playing IN A RAID then maybe that response would have been okay. But since you had no reason for it...you fail.
#60 Jul 03 2008 at 3:50 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,684 posts
I misinterpreted one of your sentences. I thought you meant "If I'm in a group with a dagger using Rogue I ignore it" as if you were saying you were ignoring hÃm on purpose.
Same thing as you did to me though; I've never said anything about mutilate in raids. I'm just defending daggers because people like Theo need to be know-it-all asshats and bash them for plainly retarded (sorry for using the word) reasons.

My response wasn't any more childish than yours, since you're pretty much directly calling me a noob.

If you don't like the way I play, that's your call. But don't expect me to sit still while you are shouting at me. On the other hand, I can't agree more with "You can have fun while raiding, but you need to strike a balance between fun, and being competant.". I'm not here to pick a fight with you, but there's such a thing as 'live and let live'.

And Theo; are you ever going to shut up and stop being a plain *** or are you one of those hopeless cases who reacts on bad things in life by yelling at others while not caring if he might be annoying them or not? If it's the latter, let me know so I can /care.
#61 Jul 03 2008 at 3:56 PM Rating: Good
***
2,680 posts
Mozared wrote:
...daggers are here for people who actually want to play a rogue, not a ninja wannabe-warrior.

Well, you kinda started it. ;)

Sits back and stirs the pot

Edited, Jul 3rd 2008 4:56pm by TherionSaysWhat
#62 Jul 03 2008 at 3:58 PM Rating: Good
***
2,550 posts
Quote:
On the other hand, I can't agree more with "You can have fun while raiding, but you need to strike a balance between fun, and being competant.".


So we both agree. Good, I don't really care anymore since we both seemed to be misinterpreting each other.

My only question is, how far in raiding are you? I'm not gonna say if you aren't past Kara or something you suck, but if thats as far as you've gotten I could see where you are coming from.
#63 Jul 03 2008 at 4:08 PM Rating: Decent
**
920 posts
Mozared, I mainly just wanted to say you are wasting your time arguing with Theo and the rest of the people that are telling you that daggers are sub-par. Like I said, I personally LOVE to play mutilate whenever I get bored of ShS. It is a great change, but everything that people say about it is true. In PvP I can blow up people with the burst damage, but it does require to be behind them. Which is very inconvenient, and not always easy to do. If you like playing Mutilate then by all means play it. Like stated before this is a game(that you pay %15 a month for) and should be played however you want. Let it be known that if you plan on raiding you are gimping your raid because combat swords is way better. Even in KARA when fighting Prince and avoiding the infernals that drop that means you are wasting an extra second or more just to get behind him again to be able to do the majority of your high damage spells. Looking through this post, I see alot of knowledgeable people(I.E. Theo, Therion, Moo, etc) trying to help you understand that mutilate is a gimped spec for raiding/pvp. Instead of arguing an endless battle just read there information and take it for what its worth. Mutilate is FUN, but if you really want to help your guild progress you should be a little more less greedy and spec combat swords for optimal dps.
____________________________
It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer. -Albert Einstein

Feyras, ****** Superhero wrote:
I think I'm going to sig myself, just to be different.


PSN tag: DavidChrist. If you add me, send me a message telling me who you are, please.
#64 Jul 03 2008 at 4:33 PM Rating: Default
****
4,684 posts
Quote:
Well, you kinda started it. ;)


Hmm... Touché. I didn't mean that insulting, it's just my primary comeback when people yell at me for playing daggers. I just absolutely hate the look of swords or maces... It's just not a rogue thing.


Quote:
My only question is, how far in raiding are you? I'm not gonna say if you aren't past Kara or something you suck, but if thats as far as you've gotten I could see where you are coming from.


*Nods* Suppose you can then. I've done nearly full Molten Core back in the day (though that was on a priest), but right now I'm mainly stuck on Kara where I've been with a number of different guilds; so it's more that I've seen a number of bosses in it in an a-chronological order. It more or less ties in with my attitude of hating know-it-all hardcore raiders. They are calling me a "noob" while I know I'm at least a 'good' player. Things like running away at 3% hp from that paladin, then shadowstepping him to avoid his hammer of wrath and finishing him off with a backstab and eviscerate in a arena match that ended up 1on1 is one of the things I've done that still make me think "Alright, tháts skill". Knowing I'm capable of actions like that and then getting called a noob by somebody for using different weapons than he does just annoys me immensely.


Feyras; I can understand your post, but it's not what I'm saying. Whether Mutilate (or even Shadowstep, as I am specced) is good for raids or not is another discussion; I assume it's not, though I've seen some interesting threads on it earlier. My spec is the main reason why I'm levelling a priest once more; they can heal pretty much regardless of spec (as long as it's not shadow, and I hate shadow anyway). On the other hand here, daggers might become raid viable again... Apperantly we're going to get some love in WOTLK, and one of those leaked subtlety talents lowers backstab's energy cost to 45 energy... that could be gamechanging for me... But that is another discussion as well I guess.
#65 Jul 03 2008 at 5:18 PM Rating: Good
***
2,550 posts
Quote:
*Nods* Suppose you can then. I've done nearly full Molten Core back in the day (though that was on a priest), but right now I'm mainly stuck on Kara where I've been with a number of different guilds; so it's more that I've seen a number of bosses in it in an a-chronological order. It more or less ties in with my attitude of hating know-it-all hardcore raiders. They are calling me a "noob" while I know I'm at least a 'good' player. Things like running away at 3% hp from that paladin, then shadowstepping him to avoid his hammer of wrath and finishing him off with a backstab and eviscerate in a arena match that ended up 1on1 is one of the things I've done that still make me think "Alright, tháts skill". Knowing I'm capable of actions like that and then getting called a noob by somebody for using different weapons than he does just annoys me immensely.


Well, I tend to find that PvP requires more skill.

But past Kara when you have to worry about enrage timers every little bit counts, so even losing 3-5% dps could end up wiping the raid.

Good luck on getting past Kara though, maybe when you experience further in raiding you'll be able to enjoy Swords more.
(That was not intended to be sarcastic or meanspirited btw.)
#66 Jul 03 2008 at 5:24 PM Rating: Default
****
4,684 posts
Thanks, but I don't think I'm ever going to try swords again (heck, my skill there's still 1... if I even learned the things). I'll leave raiding for my priest ^^.

Peace ez =)
#67 Jul 03 2008 at 6:05 PM Rating: Default
*****
13,048 posts
Daggers still aren't even good in arena.

Show me a 2600 rated rogue using daggers that isn't on a team specially geared for playing to a mut rogue's strengths, and I'll show you 2600 rated ShS rogues using tons of different partners.
#68 Jul 03 2008 at 6:14 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,761 posts
Quote:
Daggers are inferior in every way to swords; I don't care what you're doing, if you get more enjoyment from running in a little circle around people to have to use your main damage ability, good for you, here's a bologna sandwich, you're special.


I lol'd


Question theo (maybe newbish) does top end matter on mace vs. sword with ShS? We were talking about this the other day when I was dueling a good mage, and he pointed out that from a strict PVP standpoint, maces have a little more top end then swords (S2 vs. S2).

I really don't PVE on my rogue anymore. Not like I'm about to go buy new maces, but does it matter at all (top end difference).
#69 Jul 03 2008 at 7:29 PM Rating: Good
***
2,550 posts
Top End doesn't matter.

Its the average damage per hit.
#70 Jul 03 2008 at 8:03 PM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
GodOfMoo wrote:
Top End doesn't matter.

Its the average damage per hit.

Precisely.

I would ague that tighter damage range is better because RNG is just as likely to **** you as help you when it comes to wider damage range.
#71 Jul 03 2008 at 8:28 PM Rating: Good
***
2,550 posts
Actually, it would be best to use the spreadsheet rather than determine by yourself.

Who knows what factors may be involved that you aren't aware of when you pick a weapon. Not to mention that every person has different gear.

Me and another Rogue in my guild have debated what weapon is better or what neck piece if better etc...
We both use the spreadsheet and we both have different results from it. So the spreadsheet is the best thing to check.
#72 Jul 03 2008 at 11:01 PM Rating: Decent
**
608 posts
bismarckmajivo wrote:

Why do people always have to take everything personally? It wasn't a shot at you, it was basically stating that, if it takes you that long (also not aimed at you) then frankly you probably do suck.


I Wasn't taking it personally ... I know my limitations, and I know what I like and don't, so if you (or anyone else ... seeing as this isn't personal), want to think that I suck based on a few comments I make, then good for you. As I said, I just felt that the conversation HAD been quite cival until insults (albeit general ones) had to be thrown around.

bismarckmajivo wrote:

As it is, it might be a pain for you, sure. But that's no reason to discourage other people from playing it, so long as they realize they're probably losing some dps in the bargain and everyone involved is okay with that. And if you have a 600ms ping, you're already in suboptimal conditions for dpsing, and I'm willing to bet your build will play less of a role in any fight where your on-target uptime is less than 100% than your latency. (Granted, a 600ms Combat Swords is probably still better than a 600ms Mutilate, but they're both probably worse than a 200ms Mutilate.)


Not once have I mentioned that you shouldn't use it ... I was presenting my own impressions regarding the use of the ability ... if my impressions influence your decisions (without you doing any further investigations), then ... well, that's your choice. I, Me, Personally, would rather not use an ability where I constantly have to keep readjusting my position in relation to the mob.

bismarckmajivo wrote:

Mutilate as an opener is generally a poor choice, unless you meant following Cheap Shot with it. After Cheap Shot, I stab away until either a poison procs or the stun is about to wear off, to increase my odds of the 50% damage boost.


Again, using Mutilate "as an opener" was not meant in the literal sense. I just saw merit in what you said (CS first followed by Muti .. in other words, using Muti as part of your opener)... and actually supported you in it (remember), why would you then change your tune.

bismarckmajivo wrote:

In the end, you can't tell other people what's "FUN" for them. One person hates playing Rogue at all, another loves Mutilate and can't stand combat swords. As long as everybody involved understands and accepts the drawbacks of this, why not play how you want? It's a fantasy game, it's not Number Cruncher.


And yet again, I haven't once told anybody else what's fun for them ... only what is or isn't fun for me ... As for not being a number cruncher ... ever considered that Crunching Numbers and figuring out the optimal combinations, gear, numbers, etc is actually fun for some people ... or are you (once again) going against your own advice and telling people what must be fun for them.
#73 Jul 03 2008 at 11:10 PM Rating: Good
**
608 posts
Mozared wrote:
I'm saying neither of those.


Huh !

Mozared wrote:

Oh yes there is, daggers are here for people who actually want to play a rogue, not a ninja wannabe-warrior.


Sorry, I guess I misunderstood the "you don't want to play a Wannabe-warrior" part

Mozared wrote:
I just find playing combat close to playing a gimped form of a warrior in which you only use out of stealth melee abilities. Generally it's freaking boring as well.


If you think that a Combat Rogue is like a Gimped Warrior ... then I suggest you either investigate either the Skills / Talents of both, the mechanics of both, the itemisation available to both, or better yet, go and play both ... then come back and make the same statement.

And erm, are you saying you never use in stealth abilities when playing a combat rogue (CS ??). Or are you saying that as a non-combat rogue, you can use in-stealth abilities to DPS ... neither comment makes any sense to me whatsoever.
#74 Jul 04 2008 at 2:35 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,159 posts
robertlofthouse wrote:
bismarckmajivo wrote:

Why do people always have to take everything personally? It wasn't a shot at you, it was basically stating that, if it takes you that long (also not aimed at you) then frankly you probably do suck.


I Wasn't taking it personally ... I know my limitations, and I know what I like and don't, so if you (or anyone else ... seeing as this isn't personal), want to think that I suck based on a few comments I make, then good for you. As I said, I just felt that the conversation HAD been quite cival until insults (albeit general ones) had to be thrown around.

bismarckmajivo wrote:

As it is, it might be a pain for you, sure. But that's no reason to discourage other people from playing it, so long as they realize they're probably losing some dps in the bargain and everyone involved is okay with that. And if you have a 600ms ping, you're already in suboptimal conditions for dpsing, and I'm willing to bet your build will play less of a role in any fight where your on-target uptime is less than 100% than your latency. (Granted, a 600ms Combat Swords is probably still better than a 600ms Mutilate, but they're both probably worse than a 200ms Mutilate.)


Not once have I mentioned that you shouldn't use it ... I was presenting my own impressions regarding the use of the ability ... if my impressions influence your decisions (without you doing any further investigations), then ... well, that's your choice. I, Me, Personally, would rather not use an ability where I constantly have to keep readjusting my position in relation to the mob.

bismarckmajivo wrote:

Mutilate as an opener is generally a poor choice, unless you meant following Cheap Shot with it. After Cheap Shot, I stab away until either a poison procs or the stun is about to wear off, to increase my odds of the 50% damage boost.


Again, using Mutilate "as an opener" was not meant in the literal sense. I just saw merit in what you said (CS first followed by Muti .. in other words, using Muti as part of your opener)... and actually supported you in it (remember), why would you then change your tune.

bismarckmajivo wrote:

In the end, you can't tell other people what's "FUN" for them. One person hates playing Rogue at all, another loves Mutilate and can't stand combat swords. As long as everybody involved understands and accepts the drawbacks of this, why not play how you want? It's a fantasy game, it's not Number Cruncher.


And yet again, I haven't once told anybody else what's fun for them ... only what is or isn't fun for me ... As for not being a number cruncher ... ever considered that Crunching Numbers and figuring out the optimal combinations, gear, numbers, etc is actually fun for some people ... or are you (once again) going against your own advice and telling people what must be fun for them.


You're determined to ignore what I'm saying, aren't you?
#75 Jul 04 2008 at 2:45 AM Rating: Good
**
608 posts
bismarckmajivo wrote:


You're determined to ignore what I'm saying, aren't you?


Aaand what exactly am I ignoring .. I'm offering counter arguments and not agreeing with you ... not ignoring you.

You said I was discouraging people from using the ability ... I'm not, I'm saying I don't like it.

You said I was Telling people how they should have "Fun" ... I'm not, I'm saying that I don't see this ability as fun.

You said I should use CS > Mut as an opener, I said ok - good idea - I'll try and use it as an opener, then you said it's not a good idea as an opener ... unless following CS (at which stage, I admit, I got a headache .. who's ignoring whom at this stage).
#76 Jul 04 2008 at 2:52 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,159 posts
robertlofthouse wrote:
You said I should use CS > Mut as an opener, I said ok - good idea - I'll try and use it as an opener, then you said it's not a good idea as an opener ... unless following CS (at which stage, I admit, I got a headache .. who's ignoring whom at this stage).


You said you'd try using Mut as an opener. To me, an opener is your very first attack. Otherwise you're not really opening with it - you already used something else to prime your target.

Other parts of my post were directed towards the thread as a whole, not to you. Hence my annoyance with people taking everything personally these days.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 21 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (21)