Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Indirect nerf to shaman in arena.Follow

#1 Jun 22 2008 at 4:58 PM Rating: Decent
Currently on the PTR, warlock and mage armor buffs are now a physical buff(And no longer say magical on the tooltip.) and are undispellable. It hasn't been confirmed if it's a bug or not, didn't see a thread on this, so I thought I'd make one.

WOW...this hurts, particularly enhancement shaman trying to arena. You can no longer be a purge-bot on Mage Ice/molten armor and Warlock Fel armor. If these armors are becoming physical, is there any goddam reason earthsheild, a 41 point freaking non-passive talent cannot be physical as well? That would be extremely helpful to resto shams in arena...

Edited, Jun 22nd 2008 9:01pm by Taurrus
#2 Jun 22 2008 at 7:46 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
This (A.) doesn't make a lick of sense and (B.) is going to be completly unfair if it turns out to be intended and Earth Shield doesn't get the same treatment. What's the point of even having spells like Purge and Dispel if you can't remove things with them?
#3 Jun 22 2008 at 8:44 PM Rating: Good
**
574 posts
Erm hello? This is PTR, you know? Public TEST Realm? To test stuff to see how they turn out? Yeah that's how it works.
I know I know...

I'll join in the QQ if it goes live.
#4 Jun 22 2008 at 8:52 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,121 posts
Only real thing I am upset about is I can not purge mage Ice armor because I assume that is what absorbs my spells damage occasionally. not to worried about not being able to purge molten and fel armors though, its the annoying Ice buffs i know little about. I also miss purging shadow form from way back when lol.
#5 Jun 22 2008 at 9:13 PM Rating: Default
Lecanthi wrote:
Erm hello? This is PTR, you know? Public TEST Realm? To test stuff to see how they turn out? Yeah that's how it works.
I know I know...

I'll join in the QQ if it goes live.


Mmmm hmmm...why don't they test out making earthshield a physical spell then? Unlike fel and Ice armor which they spent 0 talents to get.
#6 Jun 22 2008 at 9:36 PM Rating: Good
**
574 posts
Taurrus wrote:
Lecanthi wrote:
Erm hello? This is PTR, you know? Public TEST Realm? To test stuff to see how they turn out? Yeah that's how it works.
I know I know...

I'll join in the QQ if it goes live.


Mmmm hmmm...why don't they test out making earthshield a physical spell then? Unlike fel and Ice armor which they spent 0 talents to get.


Make a difference, take action yourself and submit your feedback and suggestions to the PTR forums! Assuming that you haven't done that yet.
#7REDACTED, Posted: Jun 22 2008 at 10:00 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Well aren't you ever the optimist, good luck with that.
#8 Jun 23 2008 at 1:23 AM Rating: Good
**
574 posts
Taurrus wrote:
Lecanthi wrote:

Make a difference, take action yourself and submit your feedback and suggestions to the PTR forums! Assuming that you haven't done that yet.


Well aren't you ever the optimist, good luck with that.


Let's not get into the half empty or half full analogy shall we?

Anyway, I suggested a more effective alternative for you to consider. Up to you whether you wanna give it try or think it is full of crap.
#9 Jun 23 2008 at 7:32 AM Rating: Decent
**
947 posts
Mage armours fair enough as they have a greater offensive/defensive impact, I can see why you'd want the ability to Purge Ice Armour.

Warlock armours though? They're not really up to much to be honest, Demonic Armour is 100% useless (until WotLK) and Fel Armour is hardly a gamewinner. Neither armour is much use against a Shaman as it is, so I dont see that as a significant nerf to be honest.

And there is a difference between ES and DA/FA: mana cost. The Warlock armours cost s ludicrous amount of mana to activate, ES is comparatively cheap. Although the cooldown recently added is just stupid.
#10 Jun 23 2008 at 9:13 AM Rating: Excellent
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
You don't need to yell at Lecanthi, his remarks are perfectly logical and valid. I don't understand why people bother posting things here when they are unwilling to hear anyone else's opinion. Do you just like moaning that much?

Nothing you say here will ever change anything. Submitting feedback may or may not be a waste of time, but it still has a chance.

And there are many things that have gone on the PTR that never made it Live. Who knows why the spells were changed to physical. You never know, Shaman could gain the ability to purge them anyway. For all you know, it is in preparation for the magical creatures of WotLK.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#11 Jun 23 2008 at 9:46 AM Rating: Good
***
2,396 posts
I'm honestly not at all concerned about it in terms of balance; I just happen to think it's stupid. As I said earlier, what's the point of even having spells like Purge and Dispel if you can't remove anything with them? And yes, I know there is still plenty left to remove, but still... The "cost" of Mage and Warlock armors are moot. They buff up for free before every arena match. All the current system does is keep them from constantly re-buffing throughout a match, and honestly, this may even hurt them since they'll no longer be able to pad things like Ice Barrier and PW:S (see the patch notes where dispels now ignore things that can't be dispelled) by rebuffing with low-level spells during a match.

As for Lecanthi... yes, his remarks may be logical, but a forum is for talking about stuff. Saying, "You shouldn't post this information or have this opinion because it's stupid," is the antithesis of what a forum exists for in the first place. If Taurrus wants to QQ, let him QQ. You don't have to read it and you're under no obligation to reply to it, so don't get testy in return if he happens to defend his initial remarks.
#12 Jun 23 2008 at 2:58 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,188 posts
I don't see it as a nerf, I just see it as a buff we didn't get.

Anywho, I have fairly rotten luck, usually when a Mage's Ice Shield is up, I have to damage through it because my Purge just hit the GCD, one WF later, the shield is gone.

It's honestly no biggy.
#13 Jun 23 2008 at 4:13 PM Rating: Decent
**
574 posts
Coz you can see my facial expressions and body language over the intarwebz amirite?
#14 Jun 23 2008 at 8:42 PM Rating: Default
I'm just proposing a topic for discussion followed by an opinion.

In my opinion, I think a lot of shamans would be pissed off that mage/warlock armor is now physical, yet their 41 point talent can still be dispelled by a lolrank1arcanshot from a huntard...smells like BS to me. Also, In my opinion posting on PTR or the shaman o-forums is a complete waste of time, blizzard does what blizzard wants, regardless of mass feedback about the class.
#15 Jul 01 2008 at 6:46 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,079 posts
The mage armor they are talking about are: Mage Armor (magic resistance + 30% mana regen while casting), Ice/Frost Armor (+armor, chance to slow movement + attack speed on hit, and possibly freeze someone in place), Molten Armor (+3% spell crit, deals fire damage on hit, possible stun if specced).

This has nothing to do with the ice shield that frost mages get. Those aren't considered "armor" because it is a shield. Really none of those armors are anything worthwhile except Ice/Frost armor if you have it so it can freeze people who hit you in place.

Edited, Jul 1st 2008 10:47am by Jiade
#16 Jul 02 2008 at 6:18 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
I'll join in the QQ if it goes live.


Second.
#17 Jul 03 2008 at 4:53 AM Rating: Good
***
2,069 posts
Hooray! Welcome back, Draeneipally!
____________________________
http://www.marriageissogay.com/

Song of the day:
May 26, 2011 -- Transplants
#18 Jul 05 2008 at 2:17 PM Rating: Good
*****
13,048 posts
Taurrus wrote:
Iyet their 41 point talent can still be dispelled by a lolrank1arcanshot from a huntard

Learn to play.

http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=3044

http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=27019

Rank 6 (135 mana vs 230) is the first rank that can dispel.

It also does significantly less damage, so no hunter will ever use it.
#19 Jul 05 2008 at 2:26 PM Rating: Good
*
109 posts
I'd be pretty surprised if this actually went live. Not only does it make absolutely no sense (magic becoming physical?) and because it would severely impact the way dispel/melee teams fight mages.
#20 Jul 05 2008 at 4:04 PM Rating: Decent
**
947 posts
They've been trying to upgrade Mage defensive abilities for a long time now to boost their showing in Arena, but instead of making a single decent change they are making a series of small, ineffectual ones. This is clearly just another way they hope to let Mages even better escape melee trains, Warlocks are getting a side benefit.

Once again it's not that big a deal, I just dont see why it's being done at all. Having your Frost Armour permanently active will only really affect 2v2 and 3v3, and even then Mages are perfectly capable of (and are in fact specialised for) escaping melee classes. In the situations where it will help, Mages dont need help. In all other situations, it's pointless.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 20 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (20)