Ofc you're right, but it kind of aggravated me, how he seemed to be refusant to give the whole idea a second thought.
My calculations were based on a hitcapped mage, and on the long run, those calculations should be approximately right. After all, the same things hold true for deep fire, so I'm not so much concerned about the compareability of this. It should after all give a rough idea of how things are gonna turn out to be. If I'm not totally mistaken, this will predict the DPS better, the more you cast.
I'm still of the opinion, that the DPS-comparison ocyen posted is ********* He did a fast copy/paste action, that has no real value to me. It just kind of seemed wrong, how he just pops up and thinks he can get through with this, and "prove" that his opinion is right, with information I still don't believe to be right. Just because my calculation isn't perfect, I still think its closer to reality than what he posted. Not being entirely right, doesn't prove him right.
After all, if the real difference is somewhere around what I calculated, I'm very sceptic, that deep fire has real superiority to offer. being able to specc deep arcane, without giving up efficiancy of Fire, when its needed in long fights is considerable, cancerous said it himself: efficiancy is vital. It could replace deep arcane spell rotations with AM and AB, that somewhat gimp DPS on long fights.
Quote:
I can be OOM with all cooldowns used at a lurker fight
Its just an idea, and since I'm no raider myself I could actually just stop caring, but I didn't want to see the idea die so fast, just because of the opinion of 3 people, without even a simple Dr. Boom test. Thats why I'm trying to find someone to try it out on stuff, in a raid at best.