Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Need Help With A Bad RogueFollow

#1 Jun 13 2008 at 8:56 AM Rating: Good
*
182 posts
We recently accepted a Rogue into our guild on the basis of a great application, 10 minutes later he posted this in our "specs & builds" section of the forums: (wall of text warning)

Quote:
Well, I've already gotten a lot of flak for my build and I haven't gotten the gear to test it yet, but I'd like to explain a lot of the theorycrafting behind it and behind the reason I chose my MH wep instead of a slower, higher dmg wep.

For starters, here's the build I'm using: 3/40/18

The general idea behind this is simple; rogues kill casters. Very well. On the other hand, vs an equal gear/skill pally or warrior, they do very badly. So, in turn, I wanted to create a build that could rectify this situation into a more balanced char for world pvp. To that end, I explored a lot of skills and firstly found out that Ruthlessness, while not actually broken, has been nerfed so badly that the skill's advertised 60% proc rate is a complete lie, with the actual proc rate being around 5%. IE useless. Needing combo points in order for relentless strikes to work well, I turned to Setup, which I found worked exactly as advertised. I also found this to be THE BEST WAY to get combo points on a constantly blocking/dodging warrior, pally, or even other rogue, to the point that the better your dodge and the faster they attack, the more damage you can toss out. To suppliment this, I chose combat potency to generate energy. I had been using it before with a more purist combat build and I was extremely impressed with it. In fact, so impressed that when I tried a hemo build I couldn't stand to play it at all because of how slow hemo builds get energy. So we come to my conclusion. Energy + combo points = damage. When those combo points come from a crapton of damage avoidance you get this:
Energy + combo points + damage avoidance = WIN.

The logical end to this, oddly enough, is more or less a rogue wearing tanking gear. Ridiculous, but sound in theory at least. Keep in mind that the majority of my gems are planned to be +12 agl, and if you want to argue against that let me break it down for you why you're wrong. There is NO OTHER CHOICE for a rogue:
1 agl = .5 crit rating + .5 dodge rating + (some unconfirmed amount of parry) + .99 or so attack power, +.5 hit rating and +2 armor. All in one stat. Considering the extremely dinky amounts of all of those things on your other gem choices, delicate fire rubies are for the win. That and while going for any other stat (cough crappy crit/stam gems) compromises all others, while on the other hand it's possible to get some pretty ridiculous agl on gear.

Now onto the main point of contention. What the hell am I doing with an unbreakable will? Well that leads us into the argument of slow vs fast MH weps for rogue. For any other class the choice is simple. Other classes do lots of yellow dmg and relatively little white dmg. For them big slow huge dmg weps are the way to go. Rogues, on the other hand, get most of their dmg as white dmg. However, most of our abilities (all except shiv and mutilate) use ONLY the MH wep, so the preferred choice is mostly the same, a big slow MH for yellow dmg with a fast OH for white dmg and CP procs. This, again, brings us to warglaives as being the 'best' weapons for a rogue hands down. The distinction is not nearly so black and white, however, as I will explain.

Big Slow MH Wep:
Let me first say that there is NO DIFFERENCE between a big slow high dmg wep and a fast lower dmg one of the same dps rating in terms of rogue white dmg. The advantage gained from a hard hitting slow mh wep is that your yellow dmg goes up along with the raw dmg figure of your MH wep. In terms of PPM procs (generally mongoose being the subject thereof), there have been arguments that it enhances your proc rate in some fashion, however this is not true. Mongoose procs only for the weapon it's on, and gives an independent proc chance for each wep that it's on. Also, attack speed in general does not affect this in any way as blizzard has assured that PPM scales with attack speed to give just that: A specified number of procs per minute.

Fast MH Wep:
Well, the other argument for using a big slow MH is that, hey, if my OH is fast, then I'll get more procs of CP, right? Wrong. Tell me this, when's the last time your char attacked twice in a row with their OH wep? The correct answer is NEVER (well, unless you do something silly like shiv twice in a row). You will always attack the same. MH swing, OH swing. So the total time of the two swings is directly related to the total speed of both weapons together. Given that, if you want a LOT more CP procs, then the big slow MH weapon isn't gonna cut it. Additionally, it's MUCH easier to get that golden 1.0/1.0 using weapons that are less than 2.8 *cough* to begin with. Let me give an idea of what I mean. In order to get 1.0 out of a 2.8 warglaive, you'd need:
Slice n Dice
Blade Flurry
Abacus of Violent Odds
Dragonspine Trophy (proc)
Thundering Skyfire Diamond (proc)
AND the azzinoth proc to occur ALL AT ONCE.

Not only that, but the azzinoth proc, which is the largest contributor, is also the one that procs the least.

So, if you're fighting a warrior or rogue, and dodging a lot, and you need energy to be able to toss those dodges back at them as 5CP eviscerate damage, and you want to do this at GCD, warglaives simply aren't a very good option. Sure, I lose some yellow damage with a quicker wep, but it's not like it's a fruitless tradeoff, it just means that my character's damage will be predictably dominated by white hits most of the time.

So why unbreakable will? Well, for one, they fuglied up the blade of savagery with 2.3, which put me off that wep. Secondly, defense = damage avoidance = more procs of setup = more damage done and less damage taken and more life to take it with. Basically the reason I'm using tanking gear is cause I'm TANKING to generate combo points. Vs casters I've got all the nasty rogue tricks; poison, stun, kick, cloak of shadows, vanish, and a crapton of haste cooldowns that I can pull to start tossing out white damage like it's free candy and I'm a child molester. Vs the tanking classes you couldn't keep them stunned long enough to take down their life if you tried your best and built your char around it. As soon as they turn around it becomes a block fest and you're at the losing end, and all that crit amounts to exactly zero vs all their anti-crit and crit-dmg-reduction in addition to like 25k hp for the real elite ones. Rather than coming up with some other elaborate strategy to counter that, I'm simply fighting fire with fire. Also, in RvR, all that life keeps you in the fight if they manage to "oh ****" and stun/get behind you, while if you keep them in front of you their attacks simply feed your damage, making a very irritating character for any melee to face as well as a pretty well rounded char overall.

I like to relate this to my melee sorc from d2. "OMG NOOB SORC HITTING WITH SWORD". Yep, for 60k dmg a hit at high AR and like 90 res all and max block, with a decent amount of life on top of that and the ability to tele all over the place. Yeah, a rogue wearing tanking gear is definitely unusual, but that doesn't mean it can't kill you outright like you're nothing. Of course, whether this will work in practice is yet to be seen, but from my current experience (limited though I admit) this should work as intended, and so far I have yet to see any quirks in skills or gear that should prevent it.


Now, I'm incredibly tempted to kick him from the guild just for posting this, but since he's not an idiot and is just inexperienced, I really feel the need to help him learn about his class before letting another guild deal with him. I'm not incredibly experienced with Rogues either, but I can tell that he is theorycrafting about something he knows nothing about, I posted arguing against him but he's so stubborn that he sticks by what he said.

I'd like it if you guys could point out exactly what is wrong with what he is saying, without being rude, so I could maybe forward him here or just pass on what you say to help him learn.
#2 Jun 13 2008 at 9:06 AM Rating: Decent
He's a lost cause.

Well, not really, if you're prepared to spend hours arguing with him then it'd work fine.

I assume this is a PvP guild? Either way, you should think of adding spec to your app form.
#3 Jun 13 2008 at 9:08 AM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
Ashora wrote:
...but since he's not an idiot...


Says who? Him?

#4 Jun 13 2008 at 9:22 AM Rating: Good
*
182 posts
We're a PvE guild, but we do a fair bit of world PvP, and we do include PvE spec into our applications, but this is his PvP "build", I assume.

I am going to kick him from the guild, but I really don't want to leave him with this way of thinking about his class for other guilds to handle.

I'm saying he's not an idiot due to the way he types, mainly. It seems he's just incredibly inexperienced and has never come into contact with any sort of Rogue guide, that doesn't mean he's an idiot in general.
#5 Jun 13 2008 at 9:39 AM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
Ashora wrote:
We're a PvE guild, but we do a fair bit of world PvP, and we do include PvE spec into our applications, but this is his PvP "build", I assume.

I am going to kick him from the guild, but I really don't want to leave him with this way of thinking about his class for other guilds to handle.

I'm saying he's not an idiot due to the way he types, mainly. It seems he's just incredibly inexperienced and has never come into contact with any sort of Rogue guide, that doesn't mean he's an idiot in general.


What does typing have to do with being an idiot? (look at me)

People can has speilz gud and have grammatikally graet sentinz strukure and stil be idiots.

Let him go and forget about it. Like you said you've tried talking to him but he refuses to listen at all. That's his problem not yours. Players like that are not likely to change. Why waste your time? I'm sure there's a guild out there that will take him and not really care. Or he'll come across more players telling him he's doing it wrong. In the end it's a matter of how open-minded he really is and willing to admit he was wrong. Some people hate that. Others are willing to change for the better. Clearly if he's arguing with you then he's not one of the latter. Let him experiment if he wants to.

There are worse things to warn other guilds about a player; fighting, drama, loot-*****, cheater, etc. Trying out a stupid spec for a theory is not one of those. Drop 'em and forget 'em.
#6 Jun 13 2008 at 9:51 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
As long as he has a real spec for PVE, does it matter? If you're a PVE guild and he's playing around and experimenting with PVP stuff, I really don't see this as a reason to kick him. Experimenting is the way you find out new things. Now at this point in the expansion most of it has been done, but that doesn't mean it's wrong to try out stuff.

Seriously kick him because he uses a non standard spec in an area that doesn't matter to your guild? doesn't really add up to me. Smiley: oyvey

Now if he is refusing to listen, and ignores valid arguments then that's a whole different issue and indicates other problems you don't want to deal with. Smiley: laugh

Edited, Jun 13th 2008 12:53pm by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#7 Jun 13 2008 at 10:18 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,039 posts
the issue isnt kicking him for his offspec, the issue is hes spreading false information. thats 10 times worse. i dont care what spec someone uses, but when they claim ruthelessness is a 5% proc and that fast offhand weapons dont actually make combat potency proc more than hes actually a hurting the guild, especially through influence to the newer members or people who arent very sure about their class/spec (those stubborn types that refuse to read much on boards or believe dps spreadsheets). even worse hes probably somewhat charismatic (seeing he has good gear) and he might be what i like to call the 'guild virus'. this is also known as someone who gets lots of friends in the guild, but causes trouble, and if/when you kick him all the people that he assosciated with dont understand why and get upset at the guild. its bad for charisma and can also lead to a broken guild (i've seen it happen before).

i say drop him.

Edited, Jun 13th 2008 1:19pm by EnthalpyTheBurninator
#8 Jun 13 2008 at 10:31 AM Rating: Good
***
2,680 posts
Quote:
you said you've tried talking to him but he refuses to listen at all.

This is the reason to drop him.

A good deal of his thinking is lacking, sure. And experimentation is important, of course. But an unwillingness to have a conversation or reasonable debate is the worst problem of all.
#9 Jun 13 2008 at 11:51 AM Rating: Good
*
182 posts
Don't worry, I kicked him for stubborn ignorance and general lack of understanding, not because he wants to try something different.

I've talked to him, I asked him to read some Rogue guides at elitistjerks, and he has agreed, so hopefully he will start to learn.

I also forwarded him to this thread, which most likely stopped him being so stubborn, thanks for the help.
#10 Jun 13 2008 at 5:56 PM Rating: Default
I give him points for thinking outside the box. There has been many a time that one person who refused to give into the norm actually found out a better way of doing things.
I wish the guy luck.
I don't know how many times I've had to defend builds or weapon choices that once the detractors understood they went, wo, your right.
By the way, he's right about agi. A rogue can't go wrong with massive amounts of agi. I don't know how many times I've had to argue that one.
#11 Jun 13 2008 at 6:50 PM Rating: Good
*****
13,048 posts
allabubba wrote:
I give him points for thinking outside the box. There has been many a time that one person who refused to give into the norm actually found out a better way of doing things.
I wish the guy luck.
I don't know how many times I've had to defend builds or weapon choices that once the detractors understood they went, wo, your right.
By the way, he's right about agi. A rogue can't go wrong with massive amounts of agi. I don't know how many times I've had to argue that one.

Cookie cutter builds are there for a reason; they work.

PvP isn't an exact science by any means, but PvE sure is.

If you think any other way, you're wrong.
#12 Jun 14 2008 at 12:38 AM Rating: Default
How did cookie cutter builds come about Overlord Theophany?
Cause tons of people keep refining them. Which means people try different things.
Ta dah.

Edited, Jun 14th 2008 4:39am by allabubba
#13 Jun 14 2008 at 12:49 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
13,048 posts
allabubba wrote:
How did cookie cutter builds come about Overlord Theophany?
Cause tons of people keep refining them. Which means people try different things.
Ta dah.

No, 20/41/0 has been the same since TBC came out.
#14 Jun 14 2008 at 7:37 PM Rating: Decent
Wow, guess I have to agree or I my posts get deleted. :/
#15 Jun 14 2008 at 8:02 PM Rating: Good
**
924 posts
Agility gives hit rating now? Since when? lawl

Gkick him, repost his garbage on the o-boards and give him a link. He'll spend the next week chasing his own tail, allowing you some stress relief at work and him to not take druid tanking loot/epic gems from you.
#16 Jun 14 2008 at 8:48 PM Rating: Good
*****
13,048 posts
allabubba wrote:
Wow, guess I have to agree or I my posts get deleted. :/

No, you're arguing with me and your posts get rated below the filter.

I know more than you do, BTW.
#17 Jun 15 2008 at 3:36 AM Rating: Decent
**
876 posts
Yah I would say give him the boot.

I am all for arguing possible builds and different ways of doing things. But if he is going to be an ignorant prick and refuse to listen to other's input then gkick.

Also I would delete that board post after you kick him because his agility break down is sooo wrong it isn't even funny. What he came up with is like if I said intelligence gives you +15 mana,+.5 spell crit,+ my test scores go up. I mean he has the right idea to theory craft but he should really make sure he knows his math before he attempts it.
#18 Jun 19 2008 at 1:07 AM Rating: Decent
Kick him, i can understand he is inexperienced, but i guess he also knows in terms of dps, this is not the way you should think and then don't listen to people trying to help you.

Quote:
Big Slow MH Wep:
Let me first say that there is NO DIFFERENCE between a big slow high dmg wep and a fast lower dmg one of the same dps rating in terms of rogue white dmg.


Why the hell is only going to use white damage? There is this thing called Sinister Strike you get on level 1.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 114 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (114)