Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Question About Lifestealing & HuntersFollow

#33 Jun 11 2008 at 6:09 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,519 posts
poisonlyjynxed wrote:
I'm not asking if I should or should not run into melee and whip out raptor strike after raptor strike as if I'm some random melee huntard. That wasn't the question. I'm asking if wingclip can proc lifesteal an infinite amount of times given in a minute or if there's a CD on the proc for lifesteal.


Well, here's the thing: When you ask a REALLY retarded question, give a bit of background as to WHY you're asking it. Some times, if you don't come off as a complete idiot, you won't get flamed.

And if you go back and read your original post:

Quote:
Would it be possible for a hunter to have lifestealing on his MH and be able to spam wingclip to increase the chances of it to proc? And if so, would it be viable at all?


to which I responded:
Quote:
Lifestealing and Mongoose aren't viable at all.[...]


I chose to ignore the wingclip part of the question because if lifestealing isn't viable, the first question shouldn't matter.

Now, had you started this thread by saying "In PvP, if I'm low on health and have lifestealing on my weapons, would I be able to spam RaptorStrike/Wing Clip to increase the chances that it will proc?"

I guarantee that you would have gotten a better response. It probably wouldn't have been the answer you were hoping for, but no one would have accused you of trolling.

There is a smart way to ask a question, and there is a stupid way. You chose the latter.
#46 Jun 12 2008 at 8:42 AM Rating: Excellent
****
6,678 posts
Quote:
...You're trolling, right?

Quote:
Trolls can't spell like that. I would use the term instigator, or Aethien paid him to give us something to rant about.
Too tired though, going to bed. I will dream sweetly about torturing the OP to death with hooks and teeth before I ********** slowly while wallowing in his blood.

Quote:
If only you had done this (think before you type) the first time.

Quote:
Also, for the lifestealing thing you could have just searched for it on wowhead.

Quote:
Top comment, learn to read.

Quote:
Also, just wanted to add. Grow a freaking skin. If you think this is flaming, you need to give your head a shake

Quote:
sure....
you just didnt mention her until you realised that we were making fun of you and you couldnt recover anymore.

Quote:
This is the stupidest question on the face of the planet and you know it. You knew it before you even hit the "New thread" button. Anybody who has played Hunter past 50 knows how easy it is to kite somebody until their wit's end. Why in god's name would you want to go INTO MELEE RANGE to try and heal yourself? Being in melee range is far, FAR more dangerous than being far away for a number of reasons. Think of what a Mage can do to you if you run into their range. Or a Priest. And you'd just be retarded to step foot near any melee class with this approach. There is a multitude of ways in which to slow an opponent down enough in PVP to heal yourself. Freezing Trap->bandage, Clip/Concussive->Feign->Bandage, LoS bandages, potions, intimidate->frost trap->bandage, etcetera.


Of all of these things, you had to pick the most ridiculous one possible and then come into the lion's den to ask us what we think of it?



You are all pathetic. This isn't a flame board, it's a discussion board. Seriously, go back to the O-boards, or learn to be civil. The OP asked a question, indicated very clearly that it was strictly a hypothetical question and that they knew better, much as I have often done in the past, and you all jumped on him/her like you were kicking a dog or something.

Yes, I'm sure you see your share of genuinely stupid threads. I've stopped reading this forum many months ago. But idiotic flamelash and baiting people is a top reason why I leave forums. If you want to have your own private little place to play without fear of actually having to be constructive go to the asylum, or at least the off-topic forum. Do NOT chase people away who pose a quasi-legitimate question to people they look to and hope would know the answer.

This person was not a troll. You sure baited them good, but their original argument was not one of trolling. I'm going to nuke the hell out of the posts in this thread in the name of anti-contest +1'ing, and I had better never click on the forum and see this bullsh*t again.



Quote:
I'll bet you anything nobody here has even seen me post before.


This is true. But I like your attitude.


I don't.

Edited, Jun 12th 2008 12:48pm by Azuarc
____________________________
Only the exceptions can be exceptional.
#47 Jun 12 2008 at 9:01 AM Rating: Excellent
****
6,678 posts
BTW, I glanced over some of the other top threads in the forums. They don't completely tick me off. I don't know why you all had to be little ******* here. Even in that survival hunter thread, you gave the guys repeated chances to go read the sticky before accepting that he was refuting the work of the forum for...advice from the forum. (And yeah, that thread turned into banter that doesn't really belong, but I'm not gonna step all over that, even with the contest going. This is, after all, a discussion board. ;)
____________________________
Only the exceptions can be exceptional.
#48 Jun 12 2008 at 9:25 AM Rating: Decent
Smiley: laugh Yowch... Adminslapped. That was kinky and oddly satisfying. But a little tip, if you are going to nuke posts, don't quote them later in the thread. Kinda defeats the purpose I'd think. Fight the good fight, Az. Much love...

Edit:
Ow, and the Asylum is slowly dying. We of the OoT are slowly but surely assimilating them into our collective. Don't bother going in there because mostly what's left is the hard core that would make BT blush.

Edited, Jun 12th 2008 1:30pm by NorthAI
#49 Jun 12 2008 at 11:20 AM Rating: Excellent
****
6,678 posts
I quoted things that were being nuked so someone coming back to this thread later would understand why I went off on you guys.
____________________________
Only the exceptions can be exceptional.
#50 Jun 12 2008 at 11:23 AM Rating: Decent
That would explain it. Although I'd say it would take a completely new poster not to realize who you were talkin' about.
I mean this spankin' has been a long time coming, hasn't it? A long build up to an orgasmic climax.
I'm not ashamed to say you made me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
#51 Jun 13 2008 at 5:46 AM Rating: Decent
*****
12,975 posts
Azuarc wrote:
I quoted things that were being nuked so someone coming back to this thread later would understand why I went off on you guys.
Who are you, again?
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 132 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (132)