Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 Next »
Reply To Thread

So, you want to PvP as a DPS spec?Follow

#77 May 31 2008 at 11:21 PM Rating: Default
SomnusSleeper wrote:


Aren't you the guy who whined that he was just god awful at pvp and couldn't figure out why? Only to be told that pvp gear and a little bit of practice would help? I seem to remember that you refused that advice to get proper pvp gear and went out on your own way.


No, that was just Quor's attempt to speak for me. What I said was Shaman PvP was extremely frustrating to I decided to dedicate my efforts elsewhere. Yes I have geared my shaman for PvP, and yes the class still sucks as a DPS pvp spec.

SomnusSleeper wrote:

I fail to see how you can get that opinion. As a long time reader, I've seen previous posts by both Theo and Quor and I've also seen the recent flame wars going on within the shaman forum. While I can't say the same necessarily for Theo, Quor has always posted helpful and useful information. Please drop the victim complex as well as the superiority complex and admit to the fact that these last few threads have been extraordinarily useful through both theory craft and personal experience in teaching shamans who (unlike you apparently) would like to try and be successful in Arena as a DPS spec.


Would this be about the equivalent of someone posting on a level 1 alt on the o-forums to avoid some backlash on their main? Or perhaps a forum alt to avoid possible rate downs? At any rate, if you can take this information and be successful in Arena/BG PvP as a DPS shaman spec, more power to you. See how long you last getting your face kicked in by rogues who are now overly abundant in every PvP setting, lots of fun! What personal experience do you refer to? Neither of them do any serious pvp on a shaman, they have both admitted this repeatedly.
#78 May 31 2008 at 11:28 PM Rating: Decent
Ryugan wrote:
Or perhaps Taurrus is angry due to his previous Enhancement PVP thread was not as popular as this one. Instead of trying to refine/improve his previous thread, he would rather just attempt to bash this one down in order for his other thread to gain popularity.

I guess it is pretty vexing as to how a thread died within two days while this one has been alive for nearly six times longer. Giving the argument that "you don't pvp as a shaman so you know nothing" and "all your other thread is all bs and thats why I didn't read this one either" doesn't work very well.

Don't like Theo and Quor? Great, many other people don't either.
Don't like how your previous thread failed? Too bad, go make it better.
Think this thread has bad info? Go make a thread with better information.

Keep trashing this thread, because yea that will get you somewhere. Theo and Quor may be asses from time to time, but the information they give out are usually informative and correct. As for you, well it may be positive info, but not necessarily informative nor correct.


I actually do think Quor is informative at times. As is Theo...on the rogue forums there are many great posts from him. I really could care less about my other thread, the only reason this one has lasted so long is because it was such an obvious troll attempt. My thread was rated down by Theo and trolled, yet most of the enhancement information was repeated here...

Anyway, it doesn't vex me at all, I could really care less if I get rated down by some people who like to trash other class forums. Whilst I will be chopping heads off and checking out bewbs in AoC, my shaman will be eating dust on the shelf until WoTK comes out...

#79 Jun 01 2008 at 4:38 AM Rating: Excellent
**
947 posts
I will say one thing unrelated to Shamans or anything else discussed in this thread.

The term 'flame war' is now being used, and there is a lot of self-satisfied tutting and head-shaking going on from outside observers as a result.

May I at least point out that regardless of difference of opinion, some of us have actually attempted to keep the discussions on an even keel, stick to the points in hand and avoid disparaging remarks where possible.

Discussions of this nature almost always attract flames because they are so divisive and people feel strongly about them, but that doesnt mean that every post made in favour of either side is a 'flame'. I avoid flaming wherever I can, and I'd rather not have a bunch of people get the idea I'm here for some cheap slanging match.

Attempts have been made to foster understanding of each position, but understanding has not been reached. In that, this discussion is more or less a failure. That there are gems to be sifted from the stinking mire of crap is a testament to the forum patronage as a whole, because at least when the o-forumers go at it you can be damn sure there won't be much left to salvage.

One point though, this thread has lasted a lot longer than it might have because Quor shamelessly bumped it with a deliberate one-line flamebait post. I've rated that post down (I do not serially downrate) because it frankly merits it. The thread was waaay down the list before that point.

To conclude, please avoid perjoratives like 'flame war' and 'trolling' when the discussion has actually been expressively and professionally argued by both sides; if seeing people discuss things passionately somehow offends you then I would contest the internet is the wrong place for you to hang out. I respect my dissenters even if I dont agree with them, and I'd rather not have that respect mired by nonsensical drama-fuelling from, to borrow an in-game term, randoms.

~sins
#80 Jun 01 2008 at 8:15 AM Rating: Default
**
881 posts
Some scrub forum troll said
Quote:
Personally, after reading that, it seems to me that you have NO CLUE what you are talking about when it comes to rogues. Sap-> gouge? Or he could just sap-> cheap shot but w/e he is taking on a shaman so he can use skills only useable in stealth outside of stealth and vice versa. The fact that you're dieing in a stun lock to a rogue (who is apparently in greens too) tells me that either A. you have terrible gear or B. you're just a terrible player. Rogues should NEVER stunlock you to death. Will they kill you? Probably, rogues are incredibly strong with all of their cooldowns up. Should you be dieing that quickly though? Should you be giving into a defeatist attitude long before the fight ends? Almost certainly not. Especially if you're geared enough to 2 shot him to 44%.


First off, damn you troll, for making me post again in here to retort to the 99% of your post that was garbage.

As for my back story: My gear is actually superb for pre SSC/TK which my guild is heading to in the next 2 weeks for Hydross farming. My enchants and gems done up properly, and I've played an Enhance Shaman from lvl 1 on my first day playing WoW.

I almost always trinket out of cheap shot. Make em waste combo points. And the rest of my statement was sarcasm which tends to be lost on the addlebrained, hence your confuzzlement. I don't die to stunlock everytime , of course, but lets say the rogue gets me to say 55-65% on the first stunlock. What possible option do I have if he successfully vanishes, resaps and preps? And a properly specced rogue does increased damage and takes less damage as you come closer to the finale of the fight. No rogue kills me with more than 50% life, but I'm still a corpse and all they have to do is bandage.

A shaman's "Oh ****" button is Reincarnation, which is straight bullsh!t, kinda like your trolling 12 post scrubness.
#81 Jun 01 2008 at 1:02 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
Well... I was trying to let this page float to the bottom, but since everyone else intends on keeping it going in addition to Quor's and Theo's shameless bumping, I guess there's really no point.

DarkRein, and some others: There is absolutely no point comparing a Shaman to a Rogue in a 1v1. While it's true that Shaman do have myriad problems and are counter-classed by just about everything else out there, this is not the fight that's going to accurately represent that. Rogue vs. just about anything 1v1 is a win for the Rogue unless he messes up or his opponent gets some lucky hax.

To everyone else: troll more. Since most of you don't play Shaman and/or have no idea what you're talking about, here is Theo's guide after a run past the Rosetta Stone:

1. Only play 5v5. Pretend that 3v3, 2v2, and 1v1 don't exist.

2. Blow Heroism, buff your group (which for "some mysterious reason" is supposed to optimally include a Rogue).

3. Pick a soft target and Purge/DPS your brains out until the other team slaughters you.

Sound like fun? Go roll a Shaman.
#82 Jun 01 2008 at 2:52 PM Rating: Good
****
8,779 posts
Quote:
One point though, this thread has lasted a lot longer than it might have because Quor shamelessly bumped it with a deliberate one-line flamebait post. I've rated that post down (I do not serially downrate) because it frankly merits it. The thread was waaay down the list before that point.


hey, i found a good video of a high-rated 3's enh shammy who has played in more than 95% of the games his team has done. i know *i* learned a lot from watching that video, so i naturally assumed other people could learn a lot from it too. the guy goes against some very good RMP teams (including one with neilyo on it), as well as double melee + druid and comes out on top. his team runs like a well-oiled machine, and he has a couple of nice mods that a shaman who wishes to pvp probably should have (one called shaman friend comes to mind, which was heretofore unknown to me). one of the best ways to get better at arena is to watch how other high-rated people of your class play. rooting is an issue for a shammy in his comp, so to compensate for that, the druid and the hunter/lock make an effort to drag targets to the shammy. its great to see the druid with a fel hunter on him run over to the shammy and watch the fel hunter get pwnt. now the SL/SL lock is way squisiher, and hes either forced to fel dom a new pet, or if thats down hes basically screwed.

you call it flamebait, i call it a learning experience. if you truly didnt give a damn about any of this then you wouldnt have posted. that goes for everyone else saying the same things too; if you really dont want to see this thread, then stop clicking on it. the people who want to see this thread will find it and use it. meanwhile, the rest of yall can just use the back button, or that little X in the upper right corner of your screen (for PC users, not so sure how macs close windows) and itll be like this thread doesnt even exist.
#83 Jun 01 2008 at 3:00 PM Rating: Default
Ahh the mighty Quor has made an appearance!

Looky there! Another jumble of OT random stats pertaining to other classes!

That is like referencing an Unbreakable video from 2005 and calling it a learning experience. You know the majority of PvP vids are totally edited/staged right? No one is going to post a vid of their shaman getting their face kicked in over, and over, but I'm sure I could find you some...they will be a valuable learning experience, since you don't actually pvp with a shaman...
#84 Jun 01 2008 at 6:51 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,245 posts
Taurrus wrote:
That is like referencing an Unbreakable video from 2005 and calling it a learning experience. You know the majority of PvP vids are totally edited/staged right?


Now that one's just an unfair generalization. That's no basis to refute Quor's claim on something like that.

There are ways to counter Quor's suggestion on learning from PvP vids, but that's not one of them.
#85 Jun 01 2008 at 7:22 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,779 posts
if you bothered to actually watch the video taurrus, youd probably get a good laugh at the intro, which showcases the shammy in question dying a good three or four times.

he then goes on to show entire fights, usually ending once its "over" (which in most cases is when one person on one side dies). he even includes a fight where he, by his own admittance, made a number of mistakes, thus prolonging the fight by 2-3 times what it should have been.

and yes, for those interested, his team does win all the fights in that video. but that doesnt detract from it as a learning tool; the guy has a lot of good moves, and the teamwork used between him and his teammates is pretty amazing. regardless of it being a shammy-focused pvp vid, anyone can learn a good deal about proper arena teamwork from watching this video. i know i did.
#86 Jun 01 2008 at 8:13 PM Rating: Good
*
155 posts
Seriously Taurrus, you complain about all of the trolling that you see in these threads but you know what? The biggest troll in this thread is you. Virtually all your posts in this thread is attempting to knock someone down with no valuable information at all. Sure you may have corrected a "oh there are some people in so and so bracket" or "shamans dual-wield in pvp." None of those posts give out any valuable info. Why don't you stop trolling and give us some real pvp info and strategies.

The major parts of your "debate" consists of:
"You don't even play a shaman, so don't try to help us"
"You have a shaman, but you don't seriously arena with it, so don't help us"
Broken record much?

Tell us this, what do you mean by a serious pvp shaman? Is it someone who spends hours upon hours in arena? What if that person is horrible in pvp with a 1000 ranking? Does that person still qualify to give out info on shaman pvp? Most likely, no.

I wonder whose information would you trust more? Someone who is horrible at pvp and gives out their experience from losing as a source? Or someone who has gotten a high ranking that has played with and against high ranking shamans? The latter, at least would have gotten a first hand view at the strategies that good shamans use. For me, I would not take the information of from someone whose source is from a losers point of view.

I wonder who was it that had their information from a losers point of view but still attempted to give out pvp advice? Oh thats right, it was you Taurrus. How do I know it's from a losers point of view? Simple, you even started a QQ thread about how much shamans, i.e. yourself, suck in pvp.

So according to you, since you don't play a shaman, then you shouldn't be giving out pvp advice right? As you stated before, you are scrapping your shaman until the WotLK expansion comes out. Since you are no longer playing a shaman, take your own advice and don't give out information you pulled out from that loser *** of yours.
#87 Jun 01 2008 at 8:19 PM Rating: Decent
**
947 posts
Quote:
you call it flamebait, i call it a learning experience. if you truly didnt give a damn about any of this then you wouldnt have posted. that goes for everyone else saying the same things too;


Yes, I do call this post flamebait:

Quote:
well, i havent been rated down for a good week now, so i figured it was time to post something in the shammy forums.


There is absolutely zero merit to that post, it isnt a learning experience, it isnt helpful, it makes no statements whatsoever except you didnt want your thread to die so you bumped it to get a rise out of people. That is flamebait, if you had so much faith in people 'finding the thread' then you wouldnt have needed to boost it to the top of the pile again.

This is an extremely simple concept, the fact that you would even argue this point baffles me entirely.

The only thing I 'give a damn about' is that whatever is discussed here is argued in a reasonably upright manner, otherwise we're just o-boarders in a different colour. So when someone starts acting in that manner then yes, I confess to getting a bit irked by it. I'd like to hear a reason why I shouldnt be, to be honest.

~sins
#88 Jun 01 2008 at 10:59 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,779 posts
Quote:
There is absolutely zero merit to that post, it isnt a learning experience, it isnt helpful, it makes no statements whatsoever except you didnt want your thread to die so you bumped it to get a rise out of people. That is flamebait, if you had so much faith in people 'finding the thread' then you wouldnt have needed to boost it to the top of the pile again.


ok...so dont respond to it. rate it down and move on. youre the one that bumped the whole post just to mention that. i posted what i did cause i knew theo (and a few other people) would get a bit of a chuckle out of it.

nothing is to say theo and i cant have a little laugh to ourselves within a thread.

besides, you act like no one has ever done anything like that ever. im sure you yourself are completely innocent of ever trying to do something like what i did, but for us normal, imperfect humans, we like to have a little fun every now and then.
#89 Jun 01 2008 at 11:29 PM Rating: Decent
**
881 posts
@ Gaudion,

I commend you for trying to stay out of here.

My point was simply that we have 0 escapability. None. Notta. Zilch. Go bg for 17kish honor trinket that gives you one shot at stun-breaking and then a 2 min timer to use again and thats it.

Rogue vs. Any other class and they have a chance. Slim, but a chance to escape or even turn the tables. Shamans do not. Why?

Answer: No CC, no snare breaking outside of 1 trinket every 2 mins, which everyone else can have as well.

And I lied. Sorta. My real oh **** button is Warstomp > Earthbind > Ghost Wolf.

Hasn't worked yet. Except on Shamans. =/

Stupid Shadowstep, Intercept, Frostbolt/Blink, Root, Scattershot, Hammer of TehStun, and Deathcoil.
#90 Jun 02 2008 at 2:42 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,396 posts
DarkRein wrote:
My point was simply that we have 0 escapability. None. Notta. Zilch. Go bg for 17kish honor trinket that gives you one shot at stun-breaking and then a 2 min timer to use again and thats it.

I'm well aware of the Shaman's lack of options, and I'm not arguing that fact.

Quote:
Rogue vs. Any other class and they have a chance. Slim, but a chance to escape or even turn the tables.

... Which bring us back to the point I was trying to make, and I don't really feel like I should have to repeat it. Rogues are the single strongest 1v1 class in the game. Saying DPS Shaman get slaughtered by Rogues in a duel isn't really saying much since just about everything gets slaughtered by a Rogue in a duel unless the Rogue just isn't that good or messes up. Focusing on this match-up is just baiting more trolling, and I wanted to avoid that.

A better way to get the point across would be to talk about the way that DPS Shaman get slaughtered 1v1 against just about everything and are advantages against almost nothing, because that's quite true. Case in point:

Quote:
Stupid Shadowstep, Intercept, Frostbolt/Blink, Root, Scattershot, Hammer of TehStun, and Deathcoil.
#91REDACTED, Posted: Jun 02 2008 at 4:54 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Fix'd!
#92 Jun 02 2008 at 4:59 PM Rating: Default
Gaudion wrote:

A better way to get the point across would be to talk about the way that DPS Shaman get slaughtered 1v1 against just about everything and are advantages against almost nothing, because that's quite true. Case in point:


Not entirely true...An enhancement shaman can totally dominate a s-priest. There, we can consistently beat 1 spec out of a possible 24 for the the 8 other classes, there is hope! :)
#93 Jun 02 2008 at 7:09 PM Rating: Decent
*
155 posts
LOL. You are telling me that I am from the o-boards?
That response that you gave is exactly what the o-boards is flooded with.
Guess we all know who is a regular at the o-boards.
Obviously, my "whole lot of crap" is correct crap isn't it.
Yes shamans suck in 2v2 while other classes rule in it, because thats where pvp is balanced right?
I suggest you go back to the o-boards, I'm sure you'll find many of your kind there.
#94 Jun 03 2008 at 2:03 PM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
Gaudion wrote:
Well... I was trying to let this page float to the bottom, but since everyone else intends on keeping it going in addition to Quor's and Theo's shameless bumping, I guess there's really no point.

DarkRein, and some others: There is absolutely no point comparing a Shaman to a Rogue in a 1v1. While it's true that Shaman do have myriad problems and are counter-classed by just about everything else out there, this is not the fight that's going to accurately represent that. Rogue vs. just about anything 1v1 is a win for the Rogue unless he messes up or his opponent gets some lucky hax.

To everyone else: troll more. Since most of you don't play Shaman and/or have no idea what you're talking about, here is Theo's guide after a run past the Rosetta Stone:

1. Only play 5v5. Pretend that 3v3, 2v2, and 1v1 don't exist.

2. Blow Heroism, buff your group (which for "some mysterious reason" is supposed to optimally include a Rogue).

3. Pick a soft target and Purge/DPS your brains out until the other team slaughters you.

Sound like fun? Go roll a Shaman.

This may come as a shock to you, but rogues actually work very well on melee train teams. What other class has a basically instant armor reduction?

I mean, you can whack away on 4k armor if you really want, but IMO, I'd rather whack away on 1k, which with my armor pen on my gear, is 0.

It's not that enhancement shamans pair well with rogues; it's that they pair well with warriors (WF totem, hi), and warriors pair well on focus targets with rogues.

I posted this thread to try and be helpful. I have a perspective of someone that's had a bit of success in PvP and has played against people that are good at every single class in each bracket (though I personally will freely admit to my relative lack of knowledge in 3v3; I haven't done much outside of RRD), which I think this forum lacks.

You and Sin are to this forum what I am to the Rogue forum, I gather, yet neither of you has any proof of where you are in this game. I put my armory link in my sig so people can see what I've done, what I've accomplished, and yes, even so they can laugh when I play on bad teams. I read this forum far more often than I post in it, and both of you seem to speak from on high that your opinion is right and there's little to no proof that you have the experience to back up what you're saying.

Just my perspective, of course.
#95 Jun 03 2008 at 2:50 PM Rating: Good
***
2,396 posts
Overlord Theophany wrote:
You and Sin are to this forum what I am to the Rogue forum, I gather, yet neither of you has any proof of where you are in this game. I put my armory link in my sig so people can see what I've done, what I've accomplished, and yes, even so they can laugh when I play on bad teams.

You gather very little.

Sin has made it clear time and again that he not a Shaman main. And I have also made it clear that I don't post my armory link for a good reason. I don't particularly care for anyone and everyone checking up on every last piece of equipment I may or may not have equipped at any given moment and making a range of judgements based on them. In that, I'm not alone. There are numerous high-level PvP-ers or entire teams of PvP-ers that routinely respec and re-equip in between actual playing sessions to mask their builds and gear. All of that seems a little ridiculous to me, so I just choose to tread the far more simpler route of anonymity.

Now, based on the fact that I don't post my armory link, are you going to believe me if I tell you I'm above 1500? 1700? 1850? 2000? I highly doubt it, and that's why I've avoided going down that path. If it makes you comfortable, you're free to assume I clock in at 1300.

Now, back to you. You have, as you've said, little-to-no experience in 3v3. As far as I know, you've only 2v2'd with a Priest, or at least that was the team on which you had your greatest success, but you blamed your not getting further on the Priest. Maybe that's true, maybe it isn't... You also blame your lack of success in 5v5 on your Shaman. Again, maybe that's true, maybe that isn't... So let's get to your Shaman PvP experience.

What's that, Theo? I'm sorry, could you repeat that? You have zero PvP experence actually playing a Shaman? Well, Lordy have mercy.

You continually try to discredit Sin, myself, and numerous others by lording your PvP experience over us, but I remind you for the billionth time that you still actually have no idea what you're talking about. Not in 1v1, not in 2v2, not in 3v3, and not even in 5v5. Watching a Shaman from across an arena or BG doesn't make you any more qualified to advise on Shaman issues than anyone else in this forum if not less so. Your posts in the last PvP discussion and this guide in its entirety are nothing more than opinion and heresay that could be formulated and posted by any mook with an Allakhazam account.

So what's the difference between us? That arena representation and population representation back up what Sin, I, and some of the others are saying. None of the statistical data backs up anything you're saying, so in the end, you and Quor have to justify everything you say with, "We know more," and, "L2Play. Suck less, noob."

Just my perspective, of course. Oh, and one more thing...

Quote:
I read this forum far more often than I post in it, and both of you seem to speak from on high that your opinion is right and there's little to no proof that you have the experience to back up what you're saying.

Wow. I mean... just... wow, Theo. Even hypocrisy has its limits. May I remind you yet again that you and Quor are the ones claiming your own personal insight and opinion trumps both conventional wisdom and broad statistical data. And we speak from on high that our opinion is right? That's also to say absolutely nothing about your posts over in the Rogue forum...

EDIT: By the way, you didn't address my synopsis of your guide. I'm assuming you don't have a problem with it then, because it's accurate?

Edited, Jun 3rd 2008 11:13pm by Gaudion
#96 Jun 03 2008 at 4:12 PM Rating: Decent
Overlord Theophany wrote:

You and Sin are to this forum what I am to the Rogue forum, I gather, yet neither of you has any proof of where you are in this game. I put my armory link in my sig so people can see what I've done, what I've accomplished, and yes, even so they can laugh when I play on bad teams. I read this forum far more often than I post in it, and both of you seem to speak from on high that your opinion is right and there's little to no proof that you have the experience to back up what you're saying.

Just my perspective, of course.


Theo...why do you keep referencing your armory on your rogue like it matters? Just a FYI, Rogue does not = shaman.

Your resilience is about the same as my shammy, your ratings are sub-1800, your HK's are less than what most serious pvpers have...so why do you keep referencing it like it is something to be proud of?

Theo: "I have mad PvP skills...this backs up what I say"

Everyone else: "Um dude, you PvP with a Rogue not a shaman"

Theo: "My rogue pvp experience backs up what I say about shaman in PvP"

In short, how can you call anyone out that they have no proof what they've accomplished/where they are in the game when you pvp with a rogue, your own dam PvP rankings on a OP class are mediocre at best?

You're the biggest frigging hypocrite I've seen, anywhere.

Oh, and while we're at it, since you reference your armory so much - you have quite the history of trolling the shaman forums on the O-boards too. Troll.


Edited, Jun 3rd 2008 8:43pm by Taurrus
#97 Jun 03 2008 at 5:26 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,779 posts
he links his armory not to say "here, i have pvp experience on a shaman" but rather to say "here, i have higher-rated pvp experience than you do".

and when talking about arena, having the higher arena rating generally means being better at arena. this is especially true for unorthodox setups or those past the 1800 mark, and doubly so for those with odd comps at high ratings.

in essence, what theo (and i) are saying is "we dont play shaman, but we've played against successful shaman, and this is what we've seen". vicarious learning at its finest really.
#98 Jun 03 2008 at 6:37 PM Rating: Good
***
1,121 posts
Look people I don't know about how any of you feel but this is just a ridiculous thread.

I am not gonna say shaman is completely broken yes we have our uses in PvP, we can bring a lot to a group in many ways and forms.

But what we have here is a failure to atleast agree that yes shaman has some deficiencies.

Yes shaman can bring great burst, buffs, purges, and even spot heals in to an arena, but that doesn't mean we are a very strong class, we can succeed we can do well but it means the shaman and his team must work hard to get over the shaman's deficiencies.

Theo I am sure you know a lot about PvP and I will go ahead and say thanks for coming in here and trying to help us regardless of intension at this point. I think you would have been a bit more successful with what your trying to do here if you acknowledge that that shaman have some problems in PvP and must work hard to over come this all.

Yes I will agree shaman class as a hole is more or less QQ I suck at PvP and the threads like that should stop (or atleast decrease) and I think you do wish to due away with that, but by implying a class that definitely does have some problems in PvP has none is just ignorant.

Try to strike a compromise at least if your intension is truly to help then why not do that, I am sure if you atleast compromised with the shaman community and stop basically telling us L2P then maybe something constructive can come out of all of this otherwise its an utter waste.

I will even go as far as saying had you not pissed off so many of us in your last thread then this may have been a great thread, but the fact of the matter is regardless if you wanted to help, it just seemed like you wanted to further argue and debate with Gaud and Sins to many of us.

How about everyone let this thread burn in oblivion and in a week or maybe two try again Theo, listen to some of what we have to say and offer and put in your own opinion/theory into all of this. I think you did an ok job in your original post but like I said it was too soon, and without atleast making a compromise with us how would you be heard if what you want to do is share your knowledge of PvP and also help us out.

There must be a reason why shaman are not so satisfied with our PvP, we don't all just need to L2P (maybe some do) but maybe you can help us overcome that by explaining our deficiencies and giving us tips and tricks on how to overcome them.

Besides how will we learn to PvP if we don't know what to do when put into a bad situation, things don't always go as planned.

BTW Taurrus I am gonna go ahead and say I know you mean well and really feel passionate about the shaman class but your not helping and have only made everything in this thread worse. You have done your share of keeping this thread alive without any real constructive posts. Many shaman are disappointed with shaman at 70 but we have to try. Anyhow I hope WotLK works out better for you when you come back to the game, but just because you hated BC doesn't mean everyone did.

anyhow thats just my thoughts on this entire mess, I am done in this thread.
1 2 3 4 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 200 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (200)