Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Ravager vs CatFollow

#1 Apr 29 2008 at 5:46 AM Rating: Decent
*
78 posts
I apoliagize becuase I can't recall which thread this was on in the fourm. It was about getting traid ready and one of the commets was "and you pet better be a Ravager" Can someone please explain to me why a ravager is better than another dps like cat? I thought all dps pets were the same in regards of damage output.
#2 Apr 29 2008 at 5:48 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Gore does more damage than claw.
Ravager has gore, cat has claw.
#3 Apr 29 2008 at 6:05 AM Rating: Decent
I had a hunter last night fighting slaag tell me I was a fool, we had no tank so one of our pets was going to tank, WalkingChair had less armour/health than his pet even though I was BM and he said "get a better pet".

I told him ravager was a dps pet to which he replied "omg cats are best dps pet noob" Smiley: oyvey
#4 Apr 29 2008 at 6:40 AM Rating: Decent
**
881 posts
How about PvP, would you take a ravager over a cat in PvP?

Basically I guess the only reason you'd take a cat over a ravager in PvP is if the cat has a higher attack speed to cause more problems with casters. So my question is, are attack speeds different between pets?
#5 Apr 29 2008 at 6:47 AM Rating: Decent
*
203 posts
They used to be different, now all pets have same base attack speed, 2.0 I believe is what it is. Folks used to bring cats for pvp to interupt casters because of thier higher attack speed. Blizz normalized all pets a while back.
#6 Apr 29 2008 at 7:39 AM Rating: Excellent
*
67 posts
DPS Raid Pets:

Cats: better looking than Ravagers.

Ravagers: slight (very slight, if you do the math) advantage to DPS.

Raptors: every bit as good as cats now (DPS wise, cats do get Prowl - not all that useful in a raid), since dash was added to what they can learn.

Another option worthy of consideration is an Owl. Less DPS, but still respectable, with the addition of Screech, which means your raid will be taking less damage.

It is really a matter of taste. I find the Ravagers to be Fugly. Why I am still running with my cat, which I tamed when I was level 16.

Play the raid pet you want, and tell anyone who gives you grief about your choice of pet where to stick it. If you are not playing one of those 4 pets, then the raid leader has a point. Other pet families have a role outside of a raid.

EDIT: Did a little math. Assumptions. BM Hunter doing 1000 DPS in a boss fight. Pet is doing 30% of the damage. Going from Cat to Owl drops the hunter to 991 DPS. Ask any Tank or Healer, and they would want Screech over those 9 DPS. The change from Cat to Ravager on the same fight gives 2, maybe 3 DPS. Not a whole lot of difference. If someone is hiring and firing Hunters over which raid pet they are using, they are an ignorant noob you do not want to raid with anyway.


Oh yeah. Almost forgot the obligatory go to Petopia.com message. Go there. Amazing amount of good information on that site.

Shelor007

Edited, Apr 29th 2008 11:56am by shelordoubleoseven
#7 Apr 29 2008 at 9:02 AM Rating: Decent
**
405 posts
Some people use Windserpents also. It requires some macros and other knowledge of how to do it right, none of which I know.
#8 Apr 29 2008 at 9:13 AM Rating: Default
*
78 posts
Gore does more damage than claw.
Ravager has gore, cat has claw.

(sorry I don't konw how to link other ppls msg)

I don't even use claw!
My cat only uses dash, growl and bite. I was told a long time ago that bite was better than claw and to use both was not good. So....again is it soly based on a single pet skill or gore then that sperates the ravager and cat that makes it better?
#9 Apr 29 2008 at 9:22 AM Rating: Decent
**
405 posts
Yeah, gore is better than claw and makes a ravager better than a cat, but only slightly. If you like cats better, you should have one; the dps difference isn't significant enough.

But get your cat the claw ability. If you're the cookie cutter BM spec, your talents generate a lot of focus for your pet, and claw allows them to constantly dump that threat into DPS. Claw and gore are focus dumps, which is why they're so useful for DPS.
#10 Apr 29 2008 at 9:25 AM Rating: Decent
**
747 posts
Once you are able to get Go for the Throat and Bestial Discipline, along with a decent crit% you are able to use all of your pet abilities without worrying about focus.

In raiding, however, using dash is optional and using growl is a good way to **** off your tank, I know Growl can't keep up with a good tank, but if you have a hard hitting pet that gets a few lucky crits at the beginning and has a Growl that lands at the start of the figh, your pet will get the aggro and could potentially cause a few deaths if things go really badly.

And yeah, Ravager DPS is slightly better than cat DPS but cat models are not the ugliest things on the planet... unlike ravagers. But let's be honest if 2-5 DPS is going to make or break your raid make-up you have more problems than just the Hunter's pet choice.
#11 Apr 29 2008 at 9:41 AM Rating: Excellent
***
2,717 posts
Screech wont help in raids for several reasons:
1. If you are using screech, you are not using claw. Meaning you're doing less damage.
2. The warrior should have 2/5 imp demo shout anyway, at which point the mob is "AP-reduction capped." Unless the mob gets curse of recklessness put on it (and warlocks are likely to use CoS, CoE, CoA, or CoD instead) screech will do NOTHING to lower the mob's damage dealt.
3. Birds, while being great solo pets, sort of take up a lot of space on the screen. In raids, that can be a problem. May not be as bad with an owl, but it's absurd with a bat. I should not bat's the only bird I'd tame.
Thus, for raids, a +10% DPS pet with c/g would be better.

As to ravager vs. cat, the difference is about 13.5 damage per 25 focus (before crit, miss, or talents are factored in). Assuming 15% crit and 5% miss chance, and using c/g on each GCD except when bite is off CD (so c/g 6 times every 10.5 seconds...6-to-1 c/g-bite ratio), and 20% increased damage, gore should do about 10.18 more DPS than claw. While it may not seem like much (just 10 DPS), if you're at the point where you should be doing 1000 DPS, then 10 DPS is 1%, the same as putting a talent point in Lethal Shots. For an MM hunter, the difference would be 7.4 DPS (9% miss and 5% crit). Numbers may be off as I'm not paying too much attention to the attack table, but the point stands.

Wind serpent vs. the c/g pets...the difference is more than just macros and knowledge, it's also gear. A WS can dump focus faster than a c/g pet. So, when using GFtT, if your crit chance is high enough you will build up excess focus on a c/g pet, while a WS can dump it all. I haven't done the math, but elitistjerks ranks it at 43% (varying on spec could be 43-50%) raid buffed crit chance before a WS is better than a c/g pet. By this gear level marks shouldn't be considered if you're going to be this elitist, and survival and BM both have their advantages and disadvantages: SV will get more crits, but BM has the steady focus from BD. Shot rotations should put about the same amount of shots into the mob during the same time (both the 1:1 BM and 1:1.5 SV are about 1 shot per second).
As to the macro and knowledge, all you do is put a "/castrandom lightning breath" (or something to that effect, not sure the exact command) in your shot rotation macro. If you dont do that, the WS can do wierd things such as stopping to cast LB, or flying out of melee range to cast it.

Quote:
I had a hunter last night fighting slaag tell me I was a fool, we had no tank so one of our pets was going to tank, WalkingChair had less armour/health than his pet even though I was BM and he said "get a better pet".

I told him ravager was a dps pet to which he replied "omg cats are best dps pet noob"


He's wrong. Ravager is the best up until your crit chance makes a WS better. Claw averages 60 damage, gore 73.5, and like I said above for a BM hunter the difference is about 10 DPS. That being said, just because a ravager/WS is the best, does not mean that other pets are NOT DPS pets. Cats, ravagers, owls, etc. are still DPS pets. Just not the best DPS pets.
He also probably had more armor due to having a "tank" pet, speccing his pet for armor, and/or having more armor himself. If you really want a pet that can tank, my recommendation is a bat. Boars lost their edge this patch, and screech is incredible for AoE threat gen. With screech you wont use claw, and as bats can do bite they get that extra little damage while screeching away.

Said above, 10 DPS shouldn't make or break your raid. But if you find ways to squeeze out 10 DPS here and 5 DPS there (and so do the other dozen+ DPS that can) easily add up to 100-200 DPS for the raid.

Edited, Apr 29th 2008 10:44am by skribs
#12 Apr 29 2008 at 10:40 AM Rating: Decent
**
902 posts
Skribs wrote:
Claw averages 60 damage, gore 73.5


Isn't it 65-73.5?
#13 Apr 29 2008 at 11:37 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,717 posts
Ah, good catch. Still, that's going to be about 4-6 DPS. My point stands, everywhere you find an extra 5 DPS may not be much, but overall it adds up.
#14 Apr 29 2008 at 1:04 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
But Ravagers are soooo ugly!

Really, they look like walking chairs or something like that. It's a shame, because I'd like to get a four-legged exoskeleton pet, but maybe one with a lower profile.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#15 Apr 29 2008 at 2:12 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
But Ravagers are soooo ugly!


I guess it's a matter of opinion, I personally think they and WS are the coolest pets in the game. I'm one level away from getting my black Rav from Hellfire and i can't wait. I have the rare blue tiger from winterspring, It's going to be tough putting him on the shelf.
#16 Apr 29 2008 at 2:24 PM Rating: Decent
skribs wrote:
Screech wont help in raids for several reasons:
1. If you are using screech, you are not using claw. Meaning you're doing less damage.
2. The warrior should have 2/5 imp demo shout anyway, at which point the mob is "AP-reduction capped." Unless the mob gets curse of recklessness put on it (and warlocks are likely to use CoS, CoE, CoA, or CoD instead) screech will do NOTHING to lower the mob's damage dealt.


Unless you're ina n extremely heavily weighted raid (like 3 mages), CoR is a far greater DPS increase than eitehr CoE or CoS. It's a ~7% increase to all physical DPS - Hunters, Rogues, DPS Warriors, Feral Druids, Enhancement Shaman... so unless there's a very high number of casters in your raid, CoR is almost always the first curse to be used. Warriors should be 5/5 Imp. Demo to allow easier CoReck use.

And while not using (as many) Claws is a bit of a DPS decrease for you, it would be a survivability increase for the tank. This doesn't make it an inferior raiding pet by any measure.
#17 Apr 29 2008 at 2:28 PM Rating: Decent
******
27,272 posts
Scr still makes your melee want to kill you.
#18 Apr 29 2008 at 4:02 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Aethien wrote:
Scr still makes your melee want to kill you.


One time in Alterac Valley while my Druid was doing his survivability taunt in Dire Bear form, soaking up the damage with two dedicated healers (Shaman and Priest) healing him and five or so Horde players trying to kill him while the rest of our raid was picking them off one by one, some Hunters sent their pets on me (naturally) and they consisted of a bat and an owl. With screech on autocast.

I don't think I've ever hit the mute button as fast as I did then.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#19 Apr 30 2008 at 1:12 AM Rating: Decent
******
27,272 posts
I tend to "forget" to swap out my carrion bird if i group with the ******* rogue in my guild.
(he claims that he always tops the dps meters, while i regularly pass him with worse gear, he also said his lvl 35 alt made 350+ gold skinning lvl ~38-40 turtles in 2 days...... He also called me a noob and a moron at pvp, because i lost a duel with him where i used all my cooldowns and he only used his trinket, i have a few pieces of S1 and the S3 helm, he has full S3 with S2 shoulders and PvE weapons and i got him down to ~10%)
#20 May 01 2008 at 4:14 AM Rating: Good
***
1,292 posts
Kelnoen the Ludicrous wrote:
I had a hunter last night fighting slaag tell me I was a fool, we had no tank so one of our pets was going to tank, WalkingChair had less armour/health than his pet even though I was BM and he said "get a better pet".

I told him ravager was a dps pet to which he replied "omg cats are best dps pet noob" Smiley: oyvey

Which only demonstrates that people with strongly held opinions can still be completely incorrect.

Next time you see this Hunter, taunt him for having a Cat while you have a Ravager. Be sure to use "noob", "newb", and "fool" when you are explaining it to him, because apparently those words obviate the need for supporting evidence.
#21 May 01 2008 at 6:06 AM Rating: Decent
Mazra wrote:
But Ravagers are soooo ugly!
Really, they look like walking chairs or something like that. It's a shame, because I'd like to get a four-legged exoskeleton pet, but maybe one with a lower profile.


My Ravager is caled Walkingchair Smiley: grin
#22 May 02 2008 at 12:52 AM Rating: Decent
*
121 posts
Mazra wrote:
But Ravagers are soooo ugly!

NOWAI! :)

Quote:
Really, they look like walking chairs or something like that.

They're cuddly - mine's even called Cuddly :)
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 92 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (92)